The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1 134 protocols using originpro

1

Optimizing On-Disc Cytokine Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
If not stated otherwise, data is presented as mean ± standard deviation in text and diagrams with sample sizes stated in each case. OriginPro (Version 2021, OriginLab Corporation) in combination with OriginPro's Paired Comparison Plot plugin (version 3.6) was used for testing statistical significance of different cytokine concentrations using Tukey's range test. OriginPro was also used for linear regression of measured flow rates produced by on-disc pumping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Effects of Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide on Plant Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis and figures were generated by OriginPro (Version 2019b; OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA). All data were shown as mean ± standard error. The means of DW, gas exchange properties, mineral concentrations, consumptions, and accumulations with four replicates in each treatment were compared using Fisher LSD test at a significance level of p = 0.05 by using the application "Paired Comparison Plot" in OriginPro. The effects of N supply level and [CO 2 ], and their interaction on DW, gas exchange properties, mineral concentrations, consumptions, and accumulations were quantified using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of p = 0.05. Linear regression analyses and significance tests were performed using the application "Simple Fit" (a linear model function) in OriginPro. The 95% confidence interval for the regression slope was also constructed in the figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Toxicity Evaluation of VUV/UVC Irradiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The toxic responses measured for all endpoints were expressed as inhibition (I) relative to control samples: I = 1 − (Ri / Rc), where Ri and Rc are the responses measured for inhibited and control samples, respectively. Control samples included samples without VUV/UVC irradiation and TEB or 124T, and water samples without TEB or 124T but with VUV/UVC irradiation to assess any toxicity associated with reactive oxygen species generated during irradiation of aqueous solutions. Concentration–response curves were fitted to a Log-logistic model using iterative non-linear regression: Response=A1+A2-A11+10LogX-Cp where A1 is the bottom asymptote, A2 is the top asymptote, X refers to the median effective concentration (EC50), C is the toxicant concentration (mg/L), and p is a model parameter representing the slope of the curve. Iterative non-linear regressions and calculation of 95% confidence limits for EC50 values were performed using OriginPro (OriginPro 2021 ).
Statistical comparisons of results were carried out using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test for evaluating differences among multiple treatments, and the Mann–Whitney U test (Wilcoxon rank sum test) was used for evaluating differences between controls and defined treatments. Statistical analyses were carried out using KaleidaGraph 4.5.4 (Synergy Software, USA) with a significance level of p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data presented were acquired from a minimum of 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for comparisons across multiple samples. Tests were performed using OriginPro (version 2020b) software, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All graphs were generated using OriginPro (version 2020b) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Serum Protein Profiling for Alcohol Consumption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed on OriginPro, if not explicitly stated otherwise. A two-tailed Welch's t-test was used when comparing the difference between two groups, as each group exhibited unequal variance. To assess the statistical significance of a given sensitivity at 90% specificity, a two-tailed one-sample Student's t-test was used against the baseline sensitivity of 10%. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used when assessing the correlation between two profiles of serum protein concentrations. ROC curves were drawn on OriginPro, with score and state values being generated from the SeroHet software, which performs 1,000 iterations of 10-fold cross-validation. Logistic regression was performed using the fitglm function of MATLAB assuming the logistic binomial model of probability. Binary parameter for chronic alcohol consumption was set as one if the individual has a positive history of chronic alcohol intake and as zero if the individual has a negative history of chronic alcohol intake. Bland-Altman test was used to derive p-values from 95% confidence intervals and was performed as previously described [46 ]. Signature-wise Bonferroni correction was utilized to assess the statistical significance of fold changes for each serum protein marker. ∗p-value < 0.05; ∗∗p-value < 0.01; and ∗∗∗p-value < 0.001 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistics were performed using OriginPro (OriginPro, Massachusetts, United States) and RStudio (RStudio, Massachusetts, and United States) software. Significance was set to p < 0.05. First, a Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for normality, followed by a Grubbs test to remove outliers if data was not normal. If removal of outliers did not result in normal data, the outlier was not removed from the data set. A Levene’s test was also performed to test the equal variance assumption. For normal data with equal variance, an ANOVA with a Tukey post-hoc test was used to assess significance. If data was normal but had unequal variance, a one-way Welch’s ANOVA and Welch/Games-Howell post-hoc was performed to determine significance. In the case of non-normal data with unequal variance, a Welch’s Heteroscedastic F test and Welch/Games-Howell post-hoc were performed. Finally, if data was non-normal but had equal variance, a Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Error bars for all data are represented as mean ± standard deviation, and all graphs were made in OriginPro.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Mammalian Cell Growth Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell number was manually counted on time-lapse images every 10 h to evaluate growth behavior. The colony growth rate µ was estimated graphically by determining the slope of the linear regression from the resulting semi-logarithmical plot using OriginPro (OriginPro 2020 9.7.0.188, OriginLab Corporation, USA). Under the assumption of exponential colony growth, equation (1) was applied to convert µ to doubling times tD
(1)
Since exponential growth of mammalian cell lines can be described by a geometric sequence, respective mean values for tD and µ were determined using the geometric mean (Phoenix 1997) . In comparison to the arithmetic mean, which is especially suitable for linear sequences, the geometric mean is less prone to the influence of outliers in a broad distribution of values. For quantification of single-cell doubling time distribution, single cells were tracked manually and the time span between two cell divisions was determined. Single-cell area was analyzed using ImageJ 1.52p (Schindelin et al. 2012) . For determination of area growth, cellular contours on scaled microscope pictures were manually retraced. Cellular area was subsequently determined and plotted against cultivation duration. Analog to colony growth rates, these charts were used to determine area related single-cell growth rates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess linear or nonlinear (e.g., sigmoidal or exponential) curve fitting to the dataset was utilized by using OriginPro (OriginLab; Scientific Formosa, Taipei, Taiwan). The experimental results obtained were analyzed and, then, plotted using OriginPro (OriginLab). They were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean of (SEM). We used the paired or unpaired Student’s t-test, or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons, for statistical evaluation of differences among mean values. We used Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test, if there was possible violation with respect to the assumption of normality underlying ANOVA. p Value <0.05 was considered significant, unless stated otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrophysiological Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using Clampfit (Molecular Device), Excel (Microsoft) and OriginPro (Origin lab) and plotted using OriginPro. Numeric data were shown as mean ± s.e.m.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microcolony Growth Rate Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specific growth rate µmax and doubling time tD were analyzed to compare growth characteristics of the captured microcolonies. Cell number inside a cultivation chamber was enumerated manually every 5 h by analyzing the microscope images. The growth rate was identified graphically by determining the slope of the linear regression from the semi-logarithmical plot using OriginPro (OriginPro 2020b 9.7.5.184, OriginLab Corporation, USA). To assess single-cell doubling times, cells were tracked manually over multiple generations and the duration between two cell divisions was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!