The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using cefotaxime

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Cefotaxime-Resistant E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of cefotaxime-resistant E. coli isolates was determined by using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI, 2017). The susceptibility against eleven antibiotics, including ceftazidime (CAZ: 30 µg), ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (CAZ/CLA: 30/10 µg), cefotaxime (CTX: 30 µg), cefotaxime/clavulanic acid (CTX/CLA: 30/10 µg), cefepime (CPM: 30 µg), amikacin (AK: 30 µg), gentamicin (GM: 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP: 5 µg), levofloxacin (LVX: 5 µg), ertapenem (ETP: 10 µg), imipenem (IMP: 10 µg) (all from MastGroup Ltd., Merseyside, United Kingdom) were examined. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control sample. The double-disk synergy test (DDST) was performed according to the CLSI guidelines to detect ESBL producing isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as positive and negative controls in the DDST method, respectively. Every strain that was resistant against at least one agent in three or more antibiotic classes, considered as the Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All isolates were examined for resistance to routine antimicrobial agents by standard disk diffusion method using Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) as control strains (17 ). The antibiotics tested were gentamicin, amikacin, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole, chloramphenicol, penicillin, oxacillin, ampicillin, vancomycin, rifampicin and erythromycin (Mast Co, the UK). Isolates showing intermediate levels of susceptibility were classified as nonsusceptible.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of NDM-1 Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility of the blaNDM-1 positive isolates was determined by the Kirby–Bauer method as recommended by the CLSI. The 11 standard antibiotic disks used include: imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg) and aztreonam (30 µg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). The ESBL phenotype was identified using combined disk method by disks of ceftazidime (30 mg) with (10 mg) and without clavulanic acid (Mast Group Ltd, UK), applied to all blaNDM−1 positive isolates (15). Moreover, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem (10 µg/ml) [≤ 2 mg/L (susceptible), 4 mg/L (intermediate), and ≥ 8 mg/L (resistant)] (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) were applied by gradient test strips to blaNDM−1 positive P. aeruginosa isolates [18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibacterial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibacterial susceptibility test of isolates to cefepime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ceftizoxime (30 µg), cefpodoxime (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), and norfloxacin (10 µg) (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle, UK) was determined by disk diffusion method on Müller–Hinton agar media (Laboratorios CONDA, Madrid, Spain) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).12 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolates to cefotaxime, cefepime, and imipenem was determined by microbroth dilution method according to CLSI. To determine MIC of colistin and tigecycline by microbroth dilution method, we used the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommendations (http://www.eucast. org/clinical-breakpoints). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as standard strains in antibacterial susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility and ESBL Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of all the isolates was tested by employing the Kirby-Bauer’s technique as suggested by the CLSI (10 ). The eleven antibiotic disks used include: imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd, UK). Isolates with resistance against a minimum of three groups of antibacterial agents were considered as MDR (11 (link)). To detect ESBL phenotype combined disk method using disks of ceftazidime (30 mg) with (10 mg) and without clavulanic acid (Mast Group Ltd, UK) was applied to all positively screened isolates by modified hodgE test (MHT) (11 (link)). A growth in the area diameter of ≥5 mm around ceftazidime disc with and without clavulanic acid was expected to be a positive result for ESBL production (12 (link), 13 (link)). The MHT was performed for all isolates as recommended by CLSI (10 ). The E test (imipenem 0.002–32μg/mL) (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) was applied (according to the manufacturer’s instructions) to all positively screened isolates by PCR test for blaNDM gene, to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility pattern of isolates to different antibiotics were examined using disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer) on Muller-Hinton agar plates according to guidelines of CLSI (10 ). The antimicrobial disks were included: imipenem (10μg), meropenem (10μg), ceftazidime (30μg), carbenicillin (100μg), tobramicin (10μg), amikacin (30μg), ticarcillin (75μg), gentamicin (10μg), cefotaxime (30μg), and ceftizoxime (30μg) (MAST Co. UK). Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 were used as a control strain (11 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility to meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime and cefotaxime (Mast CO, UK) was tested by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. The antibiogram procedure was performed as the manufacturer constructed. In brief, 1.5 × 108 CFU of bacterial suspension, equivalent to McFarland Turbidity Standard No. 0.5, was transferred on Muller-Hinton agar medium (Merck, Germany) and antibiogram disks containing meropenem (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg) and cefotaxime (30 μg) were placed on the medium. Then, the media were incubated for 18 h at 35 °C. The results were interpreted according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (CLSI, 2007 ). A control strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used for quality control of susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ESBL Screening and Confirmation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Screened-positive bacterial isolates were confirmed for ESBL production using the combined-disk method according to the CLSI guidelines [20 ]. Zones of inhibition were determined for each isolate to antibiotic disks containing 30 μg of cefotaxime, 30 μg of ceftazidime and 10 μg of cefpodozime either alone or in combination with 10μg of clavulanic acid (MAST Group Ltd.). All zones of inhibition which differed by ≥ 5 mm between at least one of the standard antibiotic disks and its corresponding clavulanic combination disks were classified as having an ESBL-producer phenotype. Escherichia coli control strain ATCC 25922 was used to monitor the performance of ESBL detection agents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The profile of this test was investigated based on CLSI [30 (link)] and EUCAST guidelines [31 ] using VITEK 2 compact system (Biomerieux, Craponne, France) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method [32 (link)] for different antibiotics, including Ampicillin, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Amoxiclav, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Meropenem, Amikacin, Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin (Mast Group, Bootle, England).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates was determined by the disk agar diffusion method on Muller Hinton agar (Merck, Germany) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines21. The antibiotics included piperacillin (100 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), doripenem (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25-23.75 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), and cefepime (30 µg) (MAST Co., England). The susceptibility pattern of the isolates against aminoglycosides including kanamycin, amikacin, spectinomycin, netilmicin, gentamicin, streptomycin, and tobramycin was determined using the micro-broth dilution method according to the CLSI guidelines21. For interpretation of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, we referred to the CLSI guidelines and previous studies1,21,22. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 were used as control strains for antibiotic susceptibility testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!