The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

75 protocols using live dead baclighttm bacterial viability kit

1

Copper-Polymer Composite Biocompatibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copper powder was supplied by TraceXtec (TraceXtec, Pty., Ltd., South Africa). PDLLA (Mw 75−120 kDa) and PEO (Mw 200 kDa), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), Hams-F12, fetal bovine serum (FBS), hydrocortisone, insulin, cholera toxin and PenStrep were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The LIVE/DEAD® BaclightTM Bacterial Viability kit and FilmTracerTM SYPRO® Ruby Biofilm Matrix Stain were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Massachusetts, USA). All reagents were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Matrine Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CS with a low viscosity <200 mPa·S, matrine with a purity of 98%, and D-proline with a purity of 99% were purchased from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd. (China). Lecithin with a purity >98% was provided by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co. Ltd (China). The 2216E medium powders were purchased from Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Corporation. Different pH phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solutions were stored after sterilization. Live/dead® BacLight TM Bacterial Viability Kit (L13152) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (America). The E. coli (ATCC 8739), S. aureus (ATCC 6538), and P. aeruginosa (MCCC 1A00099) were purchased from the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualization of P. aeruginosa Biofilm Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the effect of di-rhamnolipids on P. aeruginosa PAO1 adherence to glass or plastic surfaces biofilms were developed on cover slips and examined under the microscope. An overnight culture of P. aeruginosa PAO1 was diluted to 5 × 107 cfu mL-1 in LB and 2 ml was added per well of six well microtiter plate containing glass or plastic cover slips. After 24 h, non-adherent cells were removed and biofilms were washed with 0.9% NaCl and stained with 2.5 μM SYTO9 green fluorescent dye and 2.5 μM propidium iodide (PI) red fluorescent dye of Live/Dead staining kit (LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM Bacterial Viability Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). Cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51, Applied Imaging Corp., San Jose, CA, United States) under 100,000 × magnification (glass) or 40,000 × magnification (plastic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phytochemicals' Effect on C. jejuni Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We determined the effect of phytochemicals on the viability of C. jejuni S-8 using a Live/Dead BacLightTM bacterial viability kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, C. jejuni S-8 was cultured overnight at 42°C under microaerophilic conditions. The culture was dispensed in the 24-well plates and treated with 0.25% of the phytochemicals for 5 min, followed by the addition of SYTO-9 and propidium iodide. SYTO-9 and propidium iodide stains were used for the differential staining of live and dead cells. The cells were transferred to the microscope slide and observed under the fluorescent microscope (BZ-810, Keyence Co., IL, United States) at a ×20 objective lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biofilm Viability Assessment by Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM Bacterial Viability Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Braunschweig, Germany), the plaque deposits were fluorescently stained according to the manufacturer’s protocol and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany). A phosphate-buffered saline solution (Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was used to store the stained samples at 4 °C. This enabled the initial intraoral biofilm formation to be assessed under close-to in vivo conditions. Three-dimensional images of the biofilm were taken by CLSM (SP2, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). For each test specimen, five defined positions were microscopically examined at a magnification of 10 × and 63 ×. The biofilm volume per test specimen and the live/dead distribution were quantified using the Imaris software package (Imaris x64 6.2.1, Bitplane AG, Zurich, Switzerland). In addition, a representative three-dimensional reconstruction of the biofilm was carried out. The biofilm surface coverage per test specimen was determined using the Leica LAS AF Lite and the ImageJ software (Leica LAS AF Lite, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany; ImageJ, Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial Membrane Permeability Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membrane permeability was measured by fluorescence staining using the Live/Dead® BacLight TM Bacterial Viability Kit (Thermo) [20 (link)]. Briefly, 150 μL of rToBPI1/LBP or rToBPI2/LBP protein (100 μg/mL) was incubated for 2 h with equal volumes of E. coli (2.2 × 108 CFU/mL), V. alginolyticus (2.1 × 108 CFU/mL) and S. agalactiae (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL), respectively. Then 1 μL of the fluorescent staining mixture (STYO9 0.5 μL and PI 0.5 μL) was added and incubated for 30 min away from light. The samples were observed and photographed at the excitation wavelengths of 485 nm and 535 nm and the emission wavelengths of 498 nm and 617 nm. PBS mixed with bacteria was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescence Microscopy of Antibiotic-Stressed Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures were grown as described above and treated with OFX (5 μg/ml), MMC (20 μg/ml), or Kan (50 μg/ml) at an OD600nm of 0.3. Ten microliters of cultures were collected at indicated time points, spotted on 1% agarose MOPS 0.4% glucose pads, and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. For PI staining, cells were collected at indicated time points, washed in NaCl solution (0.85%), and stained for 15 min using the LIVE/DEAD BacLightTM Bacterial Viability Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were then washed with the saline solution and transferred on a 1% agarose MOPS 0.4% glucose pad. For membrane potential assay, DiBAC4(3) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). At indicated time points, 1 ml of culture was collected and 1 µl of DiBAC4(3) (10 μg/ml) was added to the sample, followed by incubation for 15 min in the dark. Cells were then washed and transferred on 1% agarose MOPS 0.4% glucose pads. Negative control corresponds to untreated cells and positive control to heat-shocked cells at 72°C for 1 hour. For H2O2 detection after OFX treatment using H2DCFDA (Sigma-Aldrich), H2DCFDA was dissolved in 100% DMSO and, at indicated time points, 1 ml of cell culture was collected and incubated for 40 min with H2DCFDA (10 μg/ml). Cells were then washed and transferred on 1% agarose MOPS 0.4% glucose pads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualizing Bacterial Biofilm Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after washing the cells with sterile distilled water, biofilms were carefully removed from the wells with a sterile pipette tip and transferred to 100 μl sterile PBS (pH 7.3). The biofilms were stained with the LIVE/DEAD® BaclightTM Bacterial Viability kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) and FilmTracerTM SYPRO® Ruby Biofilm Matrix Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific), as recommended by the suppliers. A Carl Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) was used to study the stained biofilms. Images were processed by using the ZEN 2011 imaging software (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacterial Viability Assay on Enamel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were stained using a fluorescent bacterial viability kit (LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM Bacterial Viability Kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 30 min at room temperature in the dark [38 (link),39 (link)]. The specimens were embedded in 4% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (Section Lab Co., Ltd., Hiroshima, Japan). The adhesive-film method was used to create a frozen section of 8 µm in thickness vertically along the enamel [40 (link)]. Fluorescent tomographic imaging was performed using a CLSM (FV-300; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) as well as Ar 488 nm and He-Ne 543 nm lasers. Filters of 510–530 nm and ≥610 nm were used to detect SYTO 9 and propidium iodide, respectively [38 (link),39 (link)]. A 100× oil immersion objective lens was used. The assay was performed with three replicates per material and a control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Culturability and Viability Assessment of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the culturability of S. aureus cells, the plate counting method was applied to identify the culturable cell number. The induction culture was serially diluted with 0.9% NaCl and inoculated on TSA followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 h. When culturable, the cell number was < 1 CFU/mL for 3 days, and the cells were considered to be non-culturable (Deng et al., 2015 (link)). In addition, the LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM bacterial viability kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, China) combined with fluorescence microscopy was used to determine whether the non-culturable cells were in the VBNC state following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!