The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Water pam

Manufactured by Walz
Sourced in Germany

The Water-PAM is a laboratory instrument designed for the measurement of photosynthetic parameters in aquatic samples. It provides a non-invasive method for analyzing the photosynthetic activity of various aquatic organisms, such as phytoplankton, macroalgae, and microalgae. The core function of the Water-PAM is to assess the efficiency of the photosynthetic process in these aquatic samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using water pam

1

Measuring Algal Photosynthetic Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PSII activity of algal cells was measured using a chlorophyll fluorometer (Water-PAM Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). First, a dark adaption of 10 min was performed before applying a saturating pulse (0.6 s, 1400 µmol m−2 s−1) to measure the maximal PSII quantum yield (Fv/Fm), quantum yield of PSII (ФPSII), nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), and a relative photosynthetic electron transport rate (rETR). The Fv/Fm NPQ, and rETR were determined according to the methods described by Yao et al.18 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Photosynthetic Capacity Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chla fluorescence was measured using a pulse‐amplitude‐modulated fluorometer (Water‐PAM, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) and the method described in Kennedy et al. (2012). Measurements were taken on days 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 and recovery was assessed at 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 h.
Nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ) was calculated using the Stern–Volmer quenching parameter described in Kramer et al. (2004).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Cell Density and Chlorophyll

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Number of cells were measured using an electronic particle counter (Orifice, 50 μm; Multisizer II; Beckham Coulter, Fullerton, CA, United States) (Zheng et al., 2013 (link)).
Measurement of chlorophyll content: cells were collected by centrifugation at 3,700 g for 4 min. Chlorophyll was extracted in 80% methanol, and quantified by measuring absorbance at 650 and 665 nm (Juneau et al., 2005 (link)).
Determination of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: A portable pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer Water-PAM (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) was used to determine the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Prior to the measurements, The PSII electron transport chain was completely oxidized by putting the cells of C. reinhardtii in the dark for 10–15 min. Subsequently, triplicate of the maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) was read on the Water-PAM by applying three saturation pulses (Samadani et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microalgae Growth Monitoring and Biomass Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the batch cultivation period, OD750 of microalgae cultures was measured every 2 days by Thermo Fisher Scientific Microplater Reader (Varioskan LUX, Finland) to represent the cell concentration (Shen et al., 2022 (link); Zhang et al., 2022 (link)). At the final cultivation day (Day 10), 10 mL of C. roscoffensis cultures collected by Whatman GF/F filters (0.70 µm) were rinsed twice with Milli-Q water and dried to constant weight (60°C for 48 h) to determine the biomass. Moreover, Fv/Fm was monitored every 2 days using WATER-PAM (WALZ, Germany) to investigate the influences of antibiotics on the photoinactivation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurement in N. haitanensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 10 min of dark adaptation, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter of N. haitanensis was measured using WATER-PAM (Walz, Germany). The minimum fluorescence F0 was obtained by measuring light at an intensity of 0.1 μmol·m− 2·s− 1 and a pulse frequency of 1 Hz applied for 0.8 s. Next, the maximum fluorescence Fm was measured with a saturation pulse of 4000 μmol·m− 2·s− 1. Subsequently, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters Fv/Fm =  (Fm-F0)/Fm were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Photosynthetic Efficiency Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photosynthetic efficiency of microbial phototrophs was measured using a Pulse Amplitude Modulated (PAM) fluorometer (Water-PAM; Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). A 3 ml aliquot of water was transferred to a quartz cuvette and after a 10 min dark-adaptation period, minimum fluorescence (FO) was recorded. Upon application of a saturating pulse of light (pulse duration = 0.8 s; pulse intensity > 3000 µmol photons m−2 s−1) maximum fluorescence (FM) was determined. From these two parameters, FVFM was calculated according to the equation (FMFO)∕FM (Schreiber, 2004 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chlorophyll-a Extraction and Quantum Yield Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were filtered onto 42 mm diameter Whatman GF/F filters. The filters were then extracted in 10 ml of 90% methanol for 12 hours at 4°C in the dark. Chlorophyll-a was measured on a Turner 10AU fluorometer using the acidification method [27] .
A WaterPAM (Walz GmbH, Germany) was used for the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) measurements. Gain settings were between 18 and 22. All samples were dark adapted at −2°C for one hour prior to measurement. One-way ANOVA was used to compare end-point data for the control and treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Impacts on Microalgal Photosynthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microalgal cell density was daily monitored using a microscope and Hausser hemocytometer until the end of the experiment. Specific growth rate (μ) for each day was calculated according to the following equation: μ = lnCt2–lnCt1, where Ct2 and Ct1 are cell density at time point t2 (day) and the day before t2, respectively. To analyze the photosynthetic response of antibiotic-treated algal cells, the maximum quantum yield of PS II (Fv/Fm), and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were investigated using fast chlorophyll fluorescence with a Water-PAM (Heinz Walz, Germany) as previously described (Zhang R. et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurement with Water-PAM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Water-PAM (Walz) was used to measure the variable chlorophyll fluorescence with a Water-S stirring device capable of keeping the samples homogenous and preventing sedimentation of the cells. Light-emitting diodes supplied red measuring light (spectral peak at 650 nm), actinic light, and saturation pulses (spectral peak at 660 nm). After 20 min of dark adaption, a 2-ml sample was used to analyze fluorescence parameters Fv/Fm by measuring Fo and Fm. Light treatment strategy and stirrer operation in this study were according to the previous reports (Campbell et al., 1998 (link); Cosgrove and Borowitzka, 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Photosynthetic Fluorescence Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The photosynthetic fluorescence parameters were determined using a pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer (WATER–PAM, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). 2ml samples were taken from the incubation bottles and kept in the dark for 15min at 20°C. The assay light levels (A-PAR) between 0 and 1,120μmol photons m−2 s−1 were applied in nine steps and 45s each in fast light response curve measurements. The instant minimal (F0ʹ) and maximal fluorescence (Fmʹ) were, respectively, determined at the end of each A-PAR and saturating light pulse (800ms, 3,000μmol photons m−2 s−1). The effective photochemical quantum yield (Yield) was calculated as: Yield=(Fmʹ−F0ʹ)/Fmʹ (Baker, 2008 (link)). The relative electron transport rate (rETR) was calculated as: rETR=Yield×A-PAR (Ralph and Gademann, 2005 (link)). The parameters of the photosynthesis vs. irradiance curves (P–I curves) were analyzed as follows: rETR=rETRmax×tanh (a×A-PAR/rETRmax; Jasby and Platt, 1976 (link)). The maximal relative electron transport rate (rETRmax) represents the light-saturating level of rETR, and light use efficiency (a) was derived from the slope of each electron transport rate (ETR) vs. light curve. Saturating light intensity, Ik, is calculated from the expression rETRmax/a and is characteristic for the onset of light saturation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!