The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

131 protocols using prism software version 6

1

Comparing RNA-seq and qRT-PCR Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The one and two-way analysis of variance (ANNOVA) followed by a Bonferroni test were performed from data in triplicates (mean ± SD) using GraphPad prism software version 6.0. To examine the correlations between gene expression profiles obtained from RNA-seq and qRT-pCR, log2 fold change values were estimated among different shoots and stolons accessions. The scatterplots were then created by comparing log2 fold change values determined by RNA-seq and qRT-PCR using GraphPad prism software version 6.0. The correlations were represented in terms of coefficient of determination, i.e., R2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tissue Viability and Histomorphometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue viability data (XTT and glucose consumption) and histomorphometric analyses were analyzed using Anova followed by Tuckey's post hoc-test in Graph Pad prism software version 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Experimental Data Presentation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each experiment was repeated at three independent times. Data were presented as the mean ± SD. Unpaired two‐tailed Student's t test between two groups and one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test between multiple groups were applied. Prism software version 6 (GraphPad software) was used to plot. Differences were considered as significant where P < .05 represented as * and P < .01 represented as **.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of In Vivo Corneal Swab

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the statistical analysis conducted in the manuscript was performed using GraphPad Prism Software Version-6. All the error bars represent mean ± SD, which were automatically calculated by the software. All one-way ANOVA analysis used Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests with a single pooled variance. All two-way ANOVA analysis used Sidak’s multiple comparison tests. Plaque numbers from the in vivo corneal swab were analyzed using unpaired t tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Biological Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Where appropriate, anova, unpaired or paired T test were performed using prism software version 6 (Graph Pad) Statistical studies were validated by Omran Allatif (Statistician CIRI, Lyon, France[46 (link),48 (link)]).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Grubbs’ test, also called the ESD (extreme Studentized deviate) method, was employed to detect outliers. Data were statistically analyzed and plotted with PRISM software version 6 or 7 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Statistical differences were tested using the Student’s t-test, or a one-way or two-way ANOVA, with either a Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons or a Dunnett’s post hoc analysis to compare groups to the control. Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05. Determinations of significant difference in mRNA values were performed using Relative Expression Software Tool (REST©) 2.0 with 2000 iterations (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Murine Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative data are presented as means + SEM. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size, which was based on preliminary data and previous studies. Each experiment was performed at least 3 times. Mice were excluded from experiments if they showed any sign of morbidity. The statistical significance of differences in mean values was determined with the 2-tailed Student’s t test or Welch’s t test for comparisons between 2 groups and by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey’s or Bonferroni’s test for comparisons among 3 or more groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed with Prism software version 6 (GraphPad Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad prism software version 6. The tests used are indicated in the Figure Legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prism software version 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) was used for all statistical analysis. Statistical comparisons of treatment groups were performed with the Student’s t-test and correlation (r) between data sets were determined by Pearson correlation efficient. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. *P < .05; ** P < .01; *** P < .005; **** P < .0001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tissue Microarray Characterization of CPEB Methylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histological characterization of tissue microarrays was performed by microscopic observation and digital scan of stained specimens. Tissues were classified as positive or negative for the respective antibody. Afterwards, the positive samples were further divided into three intensity groups: 1-weak, 2-intermediate or 3-strong. Statistical analysis (Student's t test or Fisher's exact test) of CPEB expression, CPEB1/3 methylation as well as putative correlation with clinical and molecular data including overall survival, malignancy grade, IDH status was carried out with Prism Software Version 6 the GraphPad Software, Inc (La Jolla, USA) and OrigeneLab Corporation (Northampton, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!