The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using x pert pro super x ray diffractometer

1

Comprehensive Structural Analysis of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were carried out on a Philips X’Pert PRO SUPER X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromatized Cu Kα radiation. Transmission electron microscope (TEM, Hitachi H-7650) and scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL-6700F) were employed to visualize the morphologies, sizes, structures, and elemental compositions of the products. The nitrogen absorption/desorption isotherms were obtained at 77 K on a Quantachrome autosorb iQ2 automated gas sorption analyzer, using BET calculations for surface area and BJH for pore size distribution at 77 K. The soft X-ray beam was focused on the samples using an elliptical capillary condenser. A total of 122 projections were collected at tilt angles of −57 to 66° at 1° increments with 2 seconds exposures at 520 eV X-ray energy. All of the projections were corrected based on a reference image with a flat field intensity and aligned to the rotation axis. Tomographic reconstruction of the projections was carried out by the total variation (TV)-based simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on a Philips X’pert Pro super X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα Radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). High angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) was performed on a 200 kV JEOL JEM-ARM200F equipped with a double spherical aberration corrector. Elemental mapping was also collected. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on the photoelectron endstation of Hefei Light Source (HLS) with C1s energy level as reference to correct binding energy. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, PerkinElmer, Optima 7300 DV) measurement was used to determine the metal loading amounts. X-ray emission spectra were collected at the 4W1B beamline of Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF). N K-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra were analyzed at the XMCD beamline of HLS. The Ni K-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy was collected at the 1W1B beamline of BSRF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a JEOL-2010 transmission electron microscope operated at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis was measured on a Philips X’Pert Pro Super X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromatized Cu KR radiation in the 2θ range of 5–80°. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) data was measured on a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS10 infrared spectrometer. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were measured on ESCALab MKII X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (VG Scientific, London, UK), using Mg KR radiation as the exciting source. The UV data was measured by using UV-2501PC/2550 (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The specific surface area was measured with a Quantumchrome ASIQ gas sorption analyzer by degassing the gas under vacuum at 120 °C for 12 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Advanced Nanomaterial Characterization Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were acquired on a Philips X’ Pert Pro Super X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded on an ESCALAB MKII with Mg Kα (hυ = 1253.6 eV) as the excitation source. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were carried out on a scanning electron microscope (Gemini SEM 500). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (STEM-EDS) were conducted using a microscope (JEM−2100F, at 200 kV), and aberration corrector high-angle annular dark-field transmission electron microscopy (AC-HAADF-TEM, JEM-ARM200F) was performed at 200 kV with a probe spherical aberration corrector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Nanomaterial Characterization Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder XRD patterns were measured by Philips X’Pert Pro Super X-ray diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). XPS characterizations of the prepared samples were carried out on JPS-9010MC (JEOL, Japan) with a hemispherical electron energy analyzer (1486 eV Al Kα radiation). TEM images were taken on a Hitachi Model H-7700 microscope at 100 kV. HRTEM images were taken on a JEOL JEM-2100 field-emission higher-resolution transmission electron microscope at 200 kV. The aberration-corrected HAADF-STEM images and EELS analysis were collected on the JEOL ARM-200F field-emission transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV. EPR spectra for radical detection were obtained on the JEOL JES-FA200 spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline phase was identified by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Philips X'pert Pro Super X-ray diffractometer, Cu Kα radiation). The semi-quantitative XRD analysis is done by pattern simulation using Jade software. The morphology was investigated by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI S-4800) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM 2100). Nitrogen adsorption/desorption measurement was conducted on a Micromeritics Tristar 3000 system and the specific surface area was evaluated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments were performed on a PHI QUANTUM 2000 instrument to determine the chemical composition of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Polytypic Nanocrystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanocrystals dispersed in hexane were dropped on Mo grid for TEM, HRTEM and HAADF investigation, which were performed on JEOL-2010F and JEM-ARM200F with an acceleration voltage of 200 KV. EDS was carried out on Inca Oxford equipped on JEOL-2010F. The specimen prepared by drop-casting on a Si substrate was characterized by PXRD, using a Philips X’Pert PRO SUPER X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Kλ radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). The operation voltage and current were kept at 40 kV and 400 mA, respectively. The simulate WZ powder XRD pattern were obtained from Diamond 3.2. Raman spectra were recorded with a Renishaw System 2000 spectrometer using the 514 nm line of semiconductor lasers for excitation. UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy of the polytypic nanocrystals dispersed in tetrachloroethylene were measured at room temperature using a DUV—3700 UV-vis-NIR spectrometer (Shimadzu). XPS was performed on an ESCA Lab MKII XPS using Mg Ka radiation exciting source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanobelts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray power diffraction (XRD) of obtained nanobelts were characterized by using a Philips X’Pert PRO SUPER X-ray diffractometer which was equipped with graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). The operation voltage was kept at 40 KV, and the current was kept at 400 mA. Diamond 3.2 was used to simulate the wurtzite XRD patterns of CZIS and CZGS. Nanobelts dispersed in hexane were dropped on Mo grid for transmission electron microscope (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) and high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) investigation observation, which were characterized using JEM-ARM200F with an acceleration voltage of 200 KV. Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) with mapping and line-scan modes was carried out on Inca Oxford equipped on JRM-ARM200F. DUV-3700 UV–vis–NIR spectrometer (Shimadzu) was used to investigated the optical properties of the synthesized NBs. XPS was collected on an ESCALab MKII X-ray photoelectron spectrometer using Mg Ka radiation exciting source. Tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were performed using a DI Innova Multimode SPM platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were characterized by different analytic techniques. XRD was performed on a Philips X'Pert Pro Super X-ray diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromatized Cu Ka radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). Scanning electron microscope (SEM, Zeiss Supra 40) and JEOL 2010F(s) TEM were applied to investigate the size and morphology. The HRTEM images, EELS, SAED, and EDX elemental mappings were taken on JEMARM 200F Atomic Resolution Analytical Microscope with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. XPS was performed by an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (ESCALab MKII) with an excitation source of mg Kα radiation (1253.6 eV). ICP data were obtained by an Optima 7300 DV instrument. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy was carried out at the BL11U beamline of National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory in Hefei, China. The X-ray absorption spectra of Ni and S K-edges were obtained at the beamline 4B7A station of Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Nanomaterials via Advanced Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spherical aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy were conducted using an FEI Titan Themis (300 kV) microscope. TEM and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) were performed using a JEM-2100F microscope operating at 200 kV acceleration. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy images were acquired using a Gemini SEM 500 scanning electron microscope. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were measured using a Philips X’Pert Pro Super X-ray diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 1.54178 Å). XPS was recorded using a Thermo ESCALAB 250Xi equipped with an Al Kα ( = 1486.6 eV) excitation source. The binding energies obtained from XPS spectra were corrected with respect to the C 1s peak at 284.5 eV. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP–OES) was performed using an Optima 7300 DV instrument (Perkin-Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!