The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using nafion 117

1

Electrochemical Evaluation of Pt Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Platinum (II) acetylacetonate (Pt(acac)2), 5 N hydrochloric acid (HCl), ethanol, 2-propanol, and 0.1 M perchloric acid (HClO4) were all purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd. (Osaka, Japan) Pluronic® F127 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. 5% Nafion® dispersion solution and Nafion® 117 were obtained from Dupont (Wilmington, DE, USA). Milli-Q water was used in all cases. Those chemicals were used without any further purification.
For the electrochemical evaluation, Pt black and Pt/KB (TEC10E50E) were used as standard electrocatalysts for the comparison in this study and obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. and Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K. (Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nickel Alloy Electrochemical Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ni plate with a thickness of 0.1 mm and a purity of 99.99% was bought from the Shengshi Da Metal Materials Co. 1J36, 1J50, and 1J85 plates (thickness of 0.1 mm, purity of 99.99%) were bought from the Sajing Special Alloys Co. 1J35, 1J50, and 1J85 are Ni alloys, where the number represents the approximate Ni content. 1J85 plate (50 × 50 × 3 mm) was bought from the Shengyu Metal Materials Co. HMF (AR) was bought from Aladdin Shanghai Co. HMF, FDCA, HMFCA and FFCA (standard for LC) were also bought from Aladdin Shanghai Co. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, AR) was bought from Kemei Chemical Tianjin Co. The proton exchange membrane with electrical conductivity of 0.083 S cm−1 (Nafion 117) was bought from DuPont Co. All electrolyte solutions were prepared using ultra‐pure water. All materials were no further treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Cu/CuxO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the electrochemical measurements were carried out on Metrohm Autolab PGSTAT302N with standard three electrode system in a custom designed two compartment cell with a Nafion 117 (DuPont) membrane. The CFPs modified with Cu/CuxO or Cu/CuxO-GO has been used as working electrode, Ag/AgCl (saturated with KCl) as a reference electrode in cathode chamber and Pt foil as counter electrode (separately) in an anode chamber. All the potentials were referenced vis-a-vis reversible hydrogen electrode using the formula ERHE, V = E(Ag/AgCl), V + 0.197 V + (0.059 × pH) V after correcting for uncompensated ohmic losses determined through impedance measurements. 0.2 M KHCO3 saturated with either argon or CO2 was used as an electrolyte medium for all the CO2 reduction measurements, unless mentioned otherwise. 0.1 M HClO4 was used to record the CVs (cyclic voltammograms) for electrochemical surface area (ECSA) measurements. In order to avoid the effect of pH variation in CO2 purged solutions (generally, pH decreases upon CO2 purging as solution becomes more acidic), pH of the argon saturated electrolyte solutions was adjusted to 7.00 which was the pH of solutions saturated with CO2 (purging for an hour with 20 mL min−1 of flow rate).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dual-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell for Chromium Removal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structure of the dual-chamber MFC is similar to that reported by Song et al. [10 (link)]. The dual-chamber MFC was made of plexiglas material (net volume of 120 ml each). The two chambers were separated by a proton exchange membrane (Nafion117, Dupont Co., USA). The anode was made of graphite felt (40 mm × 40 mm × 5 mm, length × width × thickness). An RVC-CNT biocathode or RVC biocathode (50 mm × 25 mm × 10 mm, length × width × thickness) was placed in the cathode chamber. The anode chamber of the MFC was inoculated with 5 ml of anaerobic activated sludge and 115 ml of glucose culture medium (pH 7.0, per litre of deionized H2O) consisting of 0.31 g NH4Cl, 11.53 g Na2HPO4·12H2O, 2.77 g NaH2PO4·2H2O, 0.13 g KCl and 1 g glucose. The cathode medium (11.53 g l−1 Na2HPO4·12H2O, 0.28 g l−1 NH4Cl, 2.77 g l−1 NaH2PO4·2H2O, 0.39 g l−1 KCl, 0.1 g l−1 NaHCO3) containing 20 mg l−1 Cr(VI) (prepared by dissolving K2Cr2O7 in deionized water) was added to the cathode chamber. The MFCs were operated at a fixed external resistance of 1000 Ω and maintained at 30°C. All experiments were carried out in duplicate under each experimental condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Copper Chloride Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copper (II) chloride (CuCl2, Sigma aldrich, 98 %), lignin (alkaline, TCI, L0082), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4, Alpha chemical, 98 % ), Nafion117 ® (Dupont, USA), Ni foam (Fiaxell, Switzerland) were used as received without further treatment. All experiments were carried out using ultra-pure 18 MΩ cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microbial Fuel Cell Design and Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two types of MFCs with different designs were constructed as shown in Figure 1. Both anodic and cathodic chambers
of fabricated MFC1 and MFC2 in the laboratory scale were made of plexiglass. The volume of each chamber
in MFC1 and MFC2 (anode and cathode chambers) was 600 mL and the related working volume was 500 mL. Nafion 117
(DuPont, Wilmington, USA) was used to separate anode and cathode compartment. Carbon cloth was used as electrode
for both MFCs (plain, T-300, Toray) and projected surfaces of electrodes and membrane were 60 cm2 and 32 cm2 for MFC1 and MFC2,
respectively. Prior to use, the electrodes were immersed in distilled water for an hour and membrane was under acid and hydrogen
peroxide treatment. The cathode and anode were connected with titanium wire and voltage was recorded using a digital multimeter (Fluke 289 True RMS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Membrane Materials for Fuel Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nafion 117 (183 μm thick, 360 g m−2; DuPont), Nafion 212 (50.8 μm thick, 100 g m−2; DuPont), Nafion 1035 (89 μm thick, 175 g m2; Chemours), Aquivion E87 – 05S (50 μm thick, 1.93 g cm3; Solvay), and Aquivion E98 – 05 (50 μm thick, 1.93 g cm3; Solvay) were used in this work. Further experimental and analytical methods for CARS spectroscopy and microscopy are described in SI Appendix, Experimental Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Humin Electrochemical Potential Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A H-shaped dual chamber electrochemical cell separated with a proton exchange membrane (Nafion 117, DuPont, Japan, Tokyo) [36 (link)] was used for measurement of bulk potential of 4 g humin in 200 mL volume of anaerobic Med-A (in absence of vitamin, reducing agent, or PCP) under agitation by mechanical stirring. Coiled platinum (Pt) wires of 0.8 mm diameter and 1 m length (Nilaco, Tokyo, Japan) were used as both working, and counter electrodes; and Ag/AgCl glass electrode was used as a reference electrode (+250 ± 5 mV vs. SHE, Fusheng Analytical Instrument Co., Shanghai, China). The redox potential of the reference electrode was measured post use to check for discrepancies. The Pt wires were brushed clean, sonicated at 40 °C in pure water, and soaked in 5N HCl solution for 6 h, followed with wash in pure water before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Two-Chamber MFC Biosensor Design

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structure of a MFC biosensor was a typical two-chamber unit. The rectangular anode and cathode compartments were constructed from polyacrylic plastic (working volume: 170 mL each) and physically separated using a proton exchange membrane (PEM; Nafion 117, DuPont Co., Fayetteville, NC, USA) with a surface area of 49 cm2. The plain porous carbon paper (30.25 cm2 surface area) was used as electrodes with an OK line or wire connecting them through a variable resistor. Four pores were located at the top of the MFC for in and out of the electrode wire, addition and sampling of solutions, and online detection of ORP and pH. The anolyte of the MFC contained the diluted LBCr medium, unless stated otherwise, and the catholyte of the MFC contained 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7) and 100 mM NaCl solutions. The anode compartment was maintained anoxic by purging with nitrogen gas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrochemical Degradation of Insecticide CVP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrolysis experiments were carried out galvanostatically in an undivided cell at applied current densities values (i) between 17 and 83 mA cm -2 using a power supply (Peaktech ® 1585) during 4 hours. The solution to be treated consisted of 250 cm 3 of 60 ppm of CVP (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.014 M of Na2SO4 as supporting electrolyte. Two different materials were used as anodes: a microporous Sbdoped SnO2 ceramic electrode, described in previous studies (Mora-Gómez et al., 2020 , 2019 , 2018) , and a Boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrode (NeoCoat SA, Switzerland). The area of both anodes was 12 cm 2 . As cathode and reference electrodes were used an AISI 304 stainless steel sheet of 20 cm 2 , and an Ag/AgCl one, respectively.
Electro-oxidation tests were also performed in a divided reactor by a cationexchange membrane (Nafion 117 from Dupont). In this reactor, the solution to be treated containing the insecticide (60 mg L -1 of CVP and 0.014 M of Na2SO4) was introduced in the anodic compartment and a solution with the same concentration of supporting electrolyte without CVP was put in the cathodic compartment.
The effect of the concentration of the supporting electrolyte was also studied under this reactor configuration. For this purpose, electrochemical tests were carried out with different concentrations of Na2SO4: 0.014, 0.05 and 0.1 M.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!