The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using q exactive hf ms

1

Multistep Protein Extraction for Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted using sequential incubation with 0.5 M sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 4 M guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl).10 All extracts were labeled using tandem mass tags and analyzed on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid MS for proteomics (Thermo Scientific). A parallel reaction monitoring method was developed on a Q Exactive HF MS (Thermo Scientific). For validation in the Athero-Express Biobank,12 (link) proteins were extracted using 0.5 M NaCl and 4M GuHCl, followed by label-free quantitation by MS in the GuHCl extracts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intracellular Metabolite Extraction and LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initially, 3 × 106 cells were pelleted (300g for 2 min at room temperature) and the medium aspired followed by immediate addition of 1.5 mL ice-cold 80% MeOH and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The samples were subsequently thawed on ice, vortexed for 30 s before being snap-frozen again and the procedure repeated for a total of three cycles. Finally, any undissolved fractions were pelleted (12,000g for 10 min at 0 °C) and the supernatant dried under a light flow of N2 before the samples were resuspended in 30 μL 50% acetonitrile (pH 9) and diluted two times in 10 mM ammonium acetate in 90% acetonitrile (pH 9). Analysis of the intracellular metabolites was performed by MS-Omics. Overall, the LC–MS method was modified from Hsiao et al.42 (link) using a Thermo Scientific Vanquish LC coupled to a Thermo Q Exactive HF MS with a heated electrospray ionization interface operated in negative and positive ionization mode. For the untargeted analysis peak areas were extracted using Compound Discoverer (vers: 3.0.0.294, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), while the targeted analysis was conducted using TraceFinder (vers 4.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PRM Validation of Ovarian Function Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to validate the proteomic data obtained by TMT analysis, the PRM method (a technique based on MS analysis) was used to determine the abundance levels of selected ovarian function-related DAPs (unique peptides ≥2, fold change (FC) >1.2 or < 0.833) (31 (link)). After enzymatic hydrolysis, the peptides were desalted, lyophilized, and redissolved in 0.1% formic acid. The concentration of the peptides was determined by OD280. The peptides’ information suitable for the PRM analysis was imported into the Xcalibur™ software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for the PRM setting. Each sample contained 1 μg peptides, and 200 fmol standard peptides were added (PRTC: GILFVGSGVSGGEEGAR) for chromatographic separation using the HPLC system. Q-Exactive HF MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for the PRM/MS analysis for 60 min and positive ions were detected. All PRM scans were performed according to the inclusion list after each first-order full mass spectrum scan. The raw data of LC-PRM/MS were analyzed using Skyline software (MacCoss Lab, University of Washington) (32 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Non-targeted Metabolomics with UPLC-Q-Exactive HF MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metabolite extract (cf. Supplement) from each biological replicate was analyzed to conduct a non-targeted metabolomics study using an ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, USA) coupled with Q-Exactive HF MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Details of the metabolomics analysis including sample preparation, equipment, and methods are provided in the Supporting Information.
QC samples were obtained from pooled metabolic extracts and prepared as real samples30 (link). These QC samples were analyzed every 10 injections during the entire run to monitor the robustness of the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Targeted Metabolomic Analysis by UHPLC-HRMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample analysis was carried out by MS-Omics using a Thermo Scientific Vanquish LC coupled to Thermo Q Exactive HF MS. An electrospray ionization interface was used as ionization source. Analysis was performed in negative and positive ionization mode. The Ultra-performance liquid chromatography was performed using a slightly modified version of a previously described protocol.59 (link) Peak areas were extracted using Compound Discoverer 3.1 (Thermo Scientific). Identification of compounds was performed at four levels; Level 1: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm), and MS/MS spectra, Level 2a: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm). Level 2b: identification by accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm), and MS/MS spectra, Level 3: identification by accurate mass alone (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Q Exactive‐HF Positive Ion MS Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Q Exactive‐HF MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) was utilized for full scan MS data acquisition in the positive ion mode. The calibration solution was used to calibrate the mass axis before measurements to ensure high mass accuracy. The mass spectra were acquired across the mass range of 70–1050 with a resolution for MS1 of 60 000 at m/z 200. The MS was operated with a capillary temperature of 275 °C. The S‐Lens RF level was set to 50 and one microscan was applied. The automatic gain control (AGC) target of 1e5 and maximum injection time (IT) of 100 ms were applied for full MS scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analytical Techniques for Membrane Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Ultimate 3000 UHPLC System (Thermo, USA) was used for liquid chromatography experiments. LC-TOF/MS was performed on a UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA)-Q Exactive HF MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). A Midea microwave oven (max power = 1000 W, Guangdong, China) was used for synthesizing extraction membranes. A Saipurui SPE device with 24 ports (Tianjin, China) was used to perform membrane extraction. An Anyan nitrogen blow-drying apparatus (Hangzhou, China) was used for concentration. A Waters UPLC-Q Exactive HF MS System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) was used for identification. IR and SEM characterization were performed on a Spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) equipped with a DTGS detector, and Zeiss Ultra-55 field emission scanning electron microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolite Identification Using High-Resolution LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis was carried out using a Thermo Scientific Vanquish LC coupled to Thermo Q Exactive HF MS. An electrospray ionization interface was used as ionization source. Analysis was performed in negative and positive ionization mode. The UPLC was performed using a slightly modified version as previously described [30 ]. Peak areas were extracted using Compound Discoverer 3.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Identification of compounds were performed at four levels; Level 1: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm), and MS/MS spectra, Level 2a: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm). Level 2b: identification by accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm), and MS/MS spectra, Level 3: identification by accurate mass alone (with an accepted deviation of 3 ppm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Metabolomics and Lipidomics Analysis by UHPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolomics and lipidomics were performed on an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system coupled with a Q-Exactive HF MS (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). For the aqueous phase (metabolomics), an Xbridge amide column (100 × 2.1 mm i.d., 3.5 μm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) was employed for compound separation at 30°C. Samples were suspended in 100 μL of acetonitrile:water (1:1, v/v), and the injection volume was 10 μL. Mobile phase A consisted of 5 mM ammonium acetate in water with 5% acetonitrile, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min with the following linear gradient: 0 min, 95% B; 3 min, 90% B; 13 min, 50% B, 14 min, 50% B; 15 min, 95% B; and 17 min, 95% B.
As for lipids, chromatographic separation was performed on a reverse-phase X-select CSH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 2.5 μm; Waters) at 40°C. Two solvents, both containing 10 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% formic acid, were used for gradient elution: (A) ACN/water (3:2, v/v) and (B) IPA/ACN (9:1, v/v). The gradient program was: 0 min, 40% B; 2 min, 43% B; 12 min, 60% B; 12.1 min, 75% B; 18 min, 99% B; 19 min, 99% B; and 20 min, 40% B. The flow rate was set to 0.4 mL/min. Samples were suspended with 100 μL of chloroform:methanol (1:1, v/v) and diluted threefold with isopropanol:acetonitrile:H2O (2:1:1, v/v/v). The injection volume was 10 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample analysis was carried out by MS-Omics using a Thermo Scientific Vanquish LC coupled to Thermo Q Exactive HF MS. An electrospray ionization interface was used as ionization source. Analysis was performed in negative and positive ionization mode. The Ultra-performance liquid chromatography was performed using a slightly modified version of a previously described protocol (Hsiao et al., 2018 (link)). Peak areas were extracted using Compound Discoverer 3.1 (Thermo Scientific). Identification of compounds was performed at four levels; Level 1: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3ppm), and MS/MS spectra, Level 2a: identification by retention times (compared against in-house authentic standards), accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3ppm). Level 2b: identification by accurate mass (with an accepted deviation of 3ppm), and MS/MS spectra, Level 3: identification by accurate mass alone (with an accepted deviation of 3ppm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!