The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using xylose

1

Evaluating Carbon Source Utilization in Fungi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For growth tests, a synthetic minimal medium (MM) (2 g L−1 NaNO3, 1 g L−1 K2HPO4, 0.5 g L−1 KCl, 0.5 g L−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g L−1 FeSO4·7H2O) was prepared and supplemented with 1% (w/v) carbon source (glucose, sucrose, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), galacturonic acid (GA), polygalacturonic acid (PGA), xylose, xylan from beechwood (Carlroth, Karlsruhe, Germany), tween 80, olive oil, triolein, sodium acetate (NaAc)) and 1.5% agar (Oxoid, LP0011, Swedesboro, NJ, USA). pH was adjusted and buffered at 5 or 7 with a McIlvaine buffer. For inoculation, 7-mm diameter plugs with actively growing mycelium were used. The experiment was repeated independently three times (biological replicates), including three technical replicates (three plates) and the mean was calculated with 9 measures. The Petri dishes were incubated at 21 °C in the dark, and the growth diameter of the wild type, mutant, and complemented strains was measured to 4 dpi.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain Preservation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

S. cerevisiae strains used in this study (Table I) were provided by DSM and may be made available for academic research under a strict Material Transfer Agreement with DSM (contact: paul.waal-de@dsm.com). The culture medium used was a defined mineral medium, with vitamins prepared as described by Verduyn et al. (1992). For storage of the strains, shake flask cultures were performed in the mineral medium supplemented with 2% maltose (Sigma–Aldrich, Rockville, MD) in case of the DS68616 and DS68625‐derivatives, or 2% xylose (Roth) in case of DS71054‐derivatives. With strains DS68625, DS68616, or DS71054, the Verduyn‐urea was supplemented with 0.02% histidine (Sigma–Aldrich) to complement for the auxotrophic marker. Cultures were maintained at 30°C in an orbital shaker until stationary growth phase was reached. After the addition of glycerol to 30% (v/v), samples were stored in 2 mL aliquots at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chemostat Culture of S. cerevisiae Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. cerevisiae strains used in this study (Table 1) were provided by DSM and may be made available for academic research under a strict Material Transfer Agreement with DSM (contact: paul.waal-de@dsm.com). The culture medium used was a defined mineral medium, with vitamins prepared as described by Verduyn et al. [40 (link)]. For storage of the strains, shake flask cultures were performed in the mineral medium supplemented with 2 % maltose (Sigma-Aldrich) in case of the DS68616/DS68625/DS68625-evo-derivatives, or 2 % xylose (Roth) in case of DS71054-derivatives. With strains DS68625, DS68616, or DS71054, the Verduyn-urea was supplemented with 0.02 % histidine (Sigma-Aldrich) to complement for the auxotrophic marker. Cultures were maintained at 30 °C in an orbital shaker until stationary growth phase was reached. After the addition of glycerol to 30 % (v/v), samples were stored in 2 ml aliquots at −80 °C.
Chemostat cultures were grown in a 3-L stirred tank bioreactor (Applikon, Schiedam, The Netherlands) filled with 500 ml of the mineral medium at a temperature of 30 °C, pH 4.5 and at a dilution rate of 0.01–0.05 h−1. Stirring was performed at 400 rpm and the starting OD600 was 1. Some diffusion of oxygen was allowed via the inflowing medium and the venting vessel on the reactor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Saccharides and Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze saccharides and inhibitory compounds, 1 mL of culture was taken at the indicated time points, centrifuged (3000 rpm for 5 min) and the supernatant was diluted (1:10 in dH2O) an used for quantification by HPLC, using a Jasco HPLC 2000 plus series (Biolab, Vienna, Austria) with an Aminex HPX 87H column at 65 °C. H2SO4 (c = 5 mM) was used as eluent at an isocratic flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1. Sugars were detected with a refractive index and organic acids and inhibitors by a UV detector. Data were analyzed with ChromPass (Version 1.8.6.1, Jasco Europe, Italy). WSHL was analyzed in the same way, but was diluted 1:50. For the preparation of standards, chemicals were obtained from the following suppliers: xylitol from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), glucose, xylose, arabinose, acetic acid and formic acid from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany), cellulose form Machery-Nagel (Düren, Germany), furfural from Merck (Hohenbrunn, Germany) and HMF from Alfa Aesar (Kandel, Germany). Resulting saccharide and inhibitor yields (g per 100 g WS) were calculated as follows: g per 100 g WS=[g] saccharide per L as measured by HPLC*dilution factor[%] dry mass of WS*[g] WS loading per L
Hydrolysates were prepared at 10% solids loading, which means that 100 g WS are contained in 1 L hydrolysate. Therefore, resulting yields in g per 100 g raw material equal g L−1 hydrolysate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Saccharides and Inhibitors in Lignocellulosic Hydrolysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze saccharides and inhibitory compounds, the sterilefiltered hydrolysate samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was used for the quantification by HPLC, using a Jasco HPLC 2000 plus series (Biolab, Vienna, Austria) with an Aminex HPX 87H column at 65 °C. H 2 SO 4 (c = 5 mmol l -1 ) was used as eluent at an isocratic flow rate of 0.8 ml min -1 . Sugars were detected with a refractive index and organic acids and inhibitors by a UV detector. Data were analyzed with ChromPass (Version 1.8.6.1, Jasco Europe, Italy). For the preparation of standards, chemicals were obtained from the following suppliers: xylitol from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), glucose, xylose, arabinose, acetic acid and formic acid from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany), cellulose form Machery-Nagel (Düren, Germany), furfural from Merck (Hohenbrunn, Germany), and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) from Alfa Aesar (Kandel, Germany). Resulting saccharide yields (g) per 100 g wheat straw were calculated as following: g ½ saccharide per 100 g wheat straw ¼ g ½ saccharide per L as measured by HPLC*100 % ½ dry mass of wheat straw* g ½ wheat straw loading per L
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!