The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti flag m2 antibody

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Macao, Sao Tome and Principe, Canada

The Anti-FLAG M2 antibody is a monoclonal antibody that specifically recognizes the FLAG epitope tag. The FLAG tag is a widely used protein tag that allows for the detection and purification of recombinant proteins. The Anti-FLAG M2 antibody can be used in various applications, such as Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunocytochemistry, to detect and analyze FLAG-tagged proteins.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

634 protocols using anti flag m2 antibody

1

Immunoprecipitation Assay for Protein-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK-293T cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies). Cells were lysed in 0.5% TNTE. After pre-clearing with protein G-Sepharose, lysates were incubated with anti-Flag M2 antibody (Sigma) or anti-Hemagglutinin (HA)-antibody (Roche) bound to Protein-G Dynabeads (Life TechnologiesTM) for 2 hours at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were washed 5 times with 0.1% TNTE, subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose and immunoblotted with the anti-Hemagglutinin (HA)-antibody (Roche) or anti-Flag M2 antibody (Sigma). Detection was achieved using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-rat (Sigma) or sheep anti-mouse secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare) and chemiluminescence. ImageJ was used for quantification of band intensities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Investigating C/EBPβ Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MC3T3 cells were transfected with the 3xFlag-C/EBPβ-LAP*-coding vector or its mutant variant 3xFlag-C/EBPβ-LAP*R3L using Superfect reagent (Qiagen, Germany) and nuclear extracts prepared as described previously (Paredes et al., 2004 (link)). Coimmunoprecipitations were reported before (Sierra et al., 2003 (link)). Flag-tagged C/EBPβ-LAP* or C/EBPβ-LAP*R3L proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag M2 antibody (F3165, Sigma Aldrich). The immunocomplexes were captured using Protein G-Sepharose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The immunoprecipitated proteins were detected by Western blot using the following antibodies: anti-Brg1 serum (donated by Dr. Anthony Imbalzano), anti-Ini1 H-300 antibody (sc-13055, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-C/EBPβ C-19 antibody (sc-150, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-Flag M2 antibody (F3165, Sigma Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcription Factor Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detailed procedure is available in the supplemental information. 25bp biotinylated DNA double-stranded oligos centered around rs452384 alleles are described in Table S2. EMSAs were performed using the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (20148 Thermo Scientific). For supershift assays using FLAG-tagged proteins, MP41 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1(+)C-(K)DYK (C terminus FLAG tag) vectors expressing candidate proteins (NKX2.4, GATA4, DLX6, or PITX2) or empty vector (GenScript). Protein overexpression was verified by western blotting using monoclonal anti-Flag M2 antibody (Sigma F1804), anti-NKX2.4 antibody (abcam ab189202), anti-GATA4 antibody (Invitrogen MA5-15532), and anti-Histone H3 antibody (abcam ab1791) as a nuclear loading control. Supershift experiments were carried out by adding 2μg monoclonal anti-Flag M2 antibody (Sigma F1804) or 2μg normal mouse IgG (Santa Cruz sc2025) antibody as a negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Co-immunoprecipitation of Gem and CaV subunits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Gem and CaVβ co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed as described previously (Despang et al. 2020 ). In brief, tsA cells were harvested 48–72 h after transfection in ice cold PBS and lysed in lysis buffer (50-mM Tris; 100-mM NaCl; 10-mM EDTA; 0.4% TritonX-100; 0.4% NP-40; pH: 7.5 with HCl). Protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Sigma-Aldrich) were added immediately before lysing cells. Cell lysates were incubated for 1h at 4°C with rotation and afterwards for 30 min on ice. Cell lysates were then centrifuged for 15 min to remove cell debris. Lysate of 400μl of was incubated with 50μl (500μg)-Pierce™ Protein A/G Magnetic Beads (Thermo Scientific) and 5μl-anti-FLAG-Antibody M2 (Sigma-Aldrich) or 10-μl anti-HA 3F10 (Roche) at 4°C overnight. Beads were washed two times for 15–30 min in lysis buffer, and then proteins were eluted in 2x Laemmli buffer, incubated at 50°C for 10 min and frozen at −20°C. Elutions were separated using SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with anti-HA antibody (1:1000, Covance) and anti-FLAG antibody M2 (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CtIP and Mre11 Oxidative Modification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CtIP (1.5 μM) was incubated with 250 mM NaCl, 50 mM MOPS pH 7, 5% glycerol, 100 mM sodium ascorbate, and 10 mM H2O2 in a 20 μL reaction at 4 °C for 1, 2, or 4 hrs. Reactions were stopped by adding 5 μL of 5X SDS loading buffer supplemented with 50 mM EDTA. Samples were kept on ice until the time-course was completed, boiled for 15 minutes, and resolved on a 4–12% gradient polyacrylamide gel. The gel was either stained with Coomassie blue or transferred to a PVDF membrane and probed for the N-terminal Flag-tag (M2 anti-Flag antibody, Sigma) or the C-terminus of CtIP (#61141, Active Motif) as described in Figs. 3A and 3B.
Mre11 (5 μM) was incubated in 80 mM NaCl, 25 mM MOPS pH 7, 20 mM Tris pH 8, 8% glycerol, 5 mM H2O2, and 5 mM sodium ascorbate, at room temperature for 10 min. The oxidative cleavage was stopped by addition of SDS-PAGE loading buffer containing beta-mercaptoethanol. The cleavage products were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue or transferred to a PVDF membrane and probed for the C-terminal Flag tag (M2 anti-Flag antibody, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP-qPCR Protocol for Histone Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ChIP experiments, cells were cross-linked with formaldehyde before chromatin was extracted, sonicated, and incubated with primary antibodies Rabbit Monoclonal anti-Histone H3 (acetyl K27) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) (#ab4729, 1:500); Mouse monoclonal ANTI-FLAG® M2 antibody (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA) (#F1804, 1:100); Rabbit Polyclonal anti-BRD4 (Bethyl, Montgomery, TX) (#A301-985A100, 1:100); Mouse Monoclonal anti-KAT3B/p300 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) (#ab14984, 1:100); Normal mouse IgG (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) (#sc-2025, 1:200); Normal rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Tech, Danvers, MA) (#2729, 1:200) overnight. Antibody complexes were then captured with Dynabeads Protein G (Thermo Fisher, 10004D), and DNA was eluted, de-crosslinked, and purified. ChIP signal were calculated by qPCR (Supplementary Table 4) relative to input levels after (IgG) background subtraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Analysis of Minichromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Minichromosomes were isolated essentially as described46 (link). Cells carrying minichromosome plasmids were grown in 1 L of SILAC media70 (link) (Kaiser SC-Arg-Lys-Trp (Formedium), supplemented with 20 mg/L heavy arginine-HCl (Arg10, CK Isotopes) and 30 mg/L lysine-2HCl (Lys6, CK Isotopes) or, for a control, 20 mg/L light arginine-HCl and 30 mg/L light lysine-2HCl) at 30 °C until log phase and harvested. After washing cells in ice-cold water supplemented with 2 mM PMSF, cells were resuspended in buffer H150 (25 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.02% NP40, 1 mM PMSF, cOmplete Protease Inhibitor cocktail without EDTA (11873580001, Merck), PhosSTOP (4906845001, Merck), 5 mM nicotinamide) and disrupted using a FastPreP-24 bead beater (MP Biomedicals). Clarified lysates were prepared by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 20 min three times. lacO-containing minichromosomes were isolated by immunoprecipitating LacI-3FLAG with anti-FLAG M2 antibody (12 μg, F1804, Merck) crosslinked to Dynabeads protein G (10765583, Fisher Scientific) by dimethyl pimelimidate. Proteins on purified minichromosomes were eluted in Elution buffer (50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 0.1% RapiGest SF (186001860, Waters), 1 mM IPTG). The eluted proteins were analysed by SYPRO Ruby staining and western blot analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualization of Epigenetic Markers in Zygotes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After zFRAP analysis and observation, the zygotes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde containing 0.2% Triton X-100 for 20 min. After washing three times with PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.2% Tween 20, the zygotes were incubated with primary antibodies against H3K9me3 (ab8898; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; 1:2000), Anti-H3.3 antibody (Clone 4H2D7, Cat# CE-040B, Cosmo Bio Co., LTD; 1:500), Anti-Flag M2 antibody (F1804, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany; 1:500), Anti-Hira (#39558, Active motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA; 1:500) diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 at 4 °C overnight. After washing three times with PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.2% Tween 20, the zygotes were incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa 568 conjugated anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa 488 conjugated mouse IgG; 1:500). The stained zygotes were mounted on PBS containing 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole or Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector laboratories, INC.). The images were obtained by using confocal microscopy FV1200.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Monoclonal Antibody Production Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal antibodies for Vasa, Siwi, and Ago3 detection were produced as described previously (Nishida et al, 2015). The anti‐Vret monoclonal antibody was raised in our laboratory (Nishida et al, 2020). We produced the anti‐DDX43 monoclonal antibody by immunizing mice with the purified GST‐tagged N‐terminal region (amino acids 1–200) of DDX43. The monoclonal ANTI‐FLAG M2 antibody (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for immunoprecipitation, anti‐DDDDK‐tag monoclonal antibody (FLA‐1 clone, Medical and Biological Laboratories, Aichi, Japan) for Western blotting and non‐immune mouse IgG (Immuno‐Biological Laboratories, Gunma, Japan) were commercially sourced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis by SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis or SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an enhanced chemiluminescent detection were performed as described (GE Health Inc.) (Motaleb et al., 2000 (link), Sultan et al., 2013 (link)). Protein concentrations were determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Unless specified, 1 μg of protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Biochemical interactions of recombinant proteins such as Far-western or affinity blot assays were described previously (Toker & Macnab, 1997 (link), Kariu et al., 2015 (link), Moon et al., 2016a (link)). Briefly, 1 μg purified recombinant proteins was subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were blocked in the blocking solution (5% skim milk, 10mM Tris, 150mM NaCl and 0.3% Tween 20, pH 7.4) with gentle shaking for 4 to 6 hours at room temperature, and then incubated with purified 1xFLAG tagged proteins at concentration 2 μg/ml in blocking solution overnight. The membranes were washed 3 times with the washing buffer (10mM Tris, 150mM NaCl and 0.3% Tween 20, pH 7.4), and then probed with monoclonal anti-FLAG® M2 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!