The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

564 protocols using spss ver 21

1

Repeated Measures ANOVA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction by using SPSS ver. 21.0, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The values of each day were compared to the initial (day 0) value the same animal. Data are presented as mean ± SE. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the correlations were assessed using Spearman’s exact test by using SPSS ver. 21.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peripheral Artery Disease Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical data such as gender and risk factors were expressed in frequency and percentage while the continuous variables, namely, age, BMI, and length of DM, with normal distribution were described in mean and standard deviation. Also, PAD rates were computed. In testing associations between physician assessment vs gold standard, Chi square test of independence was used with p-value >0.05α were considered significant. Cohen Kappa (unweighted) with matrices of 2x2 and 5x5 were used in testing agreement between physician’s palpation method and Doppler. SPSS ver 21 was used as statistical software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Rigorous fMRI Group Analysis Accounting for Scanner Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A second-level analysis was conducted in SPM12 using factorial analysis. The main effect for group was examined while controlling for effects of age and gender. In addition, we used scanners (two scanners and the upgrade of the second scanner) as a factor and regressed out the effect of the scanner. This is a statistically rigorous way to control for differences in scanner effects. The main effect for the group was examined at a voxel-wise threshold of p = 0.01 (uncorrected) (42 (link)) using the whole brain mask. Cluster level significant results at p = 0.05 (corrected) were then calculated using the 3Dclustsim tool in AFNI using the autocorrelation function (ACF) method (42 (link)). Next, the main effects for ROIs were used to extract connectivity values and used in a statistical software (SPSS ver. 21) to depict the differences between groups as box plots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EMG and Pain Level Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Significant difference in EMG measurement items and VAS pain level was analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repeated measure using statistical program SPSS (Ver. 21). P<0.05 was considered as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson’s chi-square test for discrete variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables were used to compare patient characteristics. OS was defined as the period from the date of diagnosis to the date of the last follow-up or death from any cause. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using log-rank test. Univariate analysis of factors associated with EM was performed with the χ2 test. Among the factors, those with P < 0.05 were selected and included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. All statistical computations were performed using SPSS ver. 21 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of MPM and MPD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Demographic data and the frequencies of CT findings in the MPM and MPD groups were compared using the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The importance of findings was assessed using p values, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fish Kairomone-Driven Mating Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed contact frequency and duration with respect to fish kairomones, food quantity, and female reproductive phase using analysis of variance (ANOVA, SPSS, ver. 21).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Software SPSS ver.21 (SPSS 21.0 for Windows, USA) was used to accomplish the statistical investigation. Level of significance among the groups was set at a p-value of less than 0.05, and it was deduced by the one-way analysis of variance statistical method (ANOVA). Furthermore, the Tukey’s test was employed to statistically differentiate within the groups (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Cytotoxicity Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data is presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All the experiments were carried out in triplicate. SPSS Ver. 21 software was used for Post Hoc Multiple Comparison test in One Way ANOVA and IC50 was determined by using Table curve software 2D version 4. Origin 8.5 software was used for graphical presentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Analysis of Biological Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The descriptive statistics for the features studied are mean and standard deviation. Kruskal Wallis test was used to compare the groups in terms of these characteristics. Duncan test was performed to identify different groups. The statistical significance level in the calculations was 5% and the statistical package program SPSS (ver. 21) was used for the calculations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!