The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using anti il 17a

1

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human cells were stained with the following antibodies: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-anti-CD4, PE-cyanine 7 (Cy7)-conjugated anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-17A, and anti-TNF-α (all from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Mouse cells were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD4, PE-anti-chemokine (C-X-C) motif receptor 5, PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-inducible costimulatory molecule, anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-17A, and anti-TNF-α (all from BioLegend).
Intracellular staining was performed as follows. PBMCs or splenocytes were stimulated with 50 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, 750 ng/ml ionomycin (both from Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 μl/ml GolgiStop (BD Biosciences) for 5 h at 37 °C. Surface staining was performed for 20 minutes with FITC anti-human/anti-mouse CD4 antibody on ice. Cells were washed and resuspended in fixation/permeabilization solution (BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit; BD Biosciences) and stained with PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-17A, and anti-TNF-α (all from BioLegend) for flow cytometric analysis. PE-Cy7-conjugated IgG1 and FITC-conjugated IgG1 (BD Biosciences) were used as isotype controls. All data were analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric flow cytometry of T-cell subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used flow cytometry analysis to assess the production of FOXP3, Helios, GATA3, IL-9, IL-17A, and IL-10 by CXCR6+ and CD4+ T cells. Briefly, splenocytes were incubated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)/ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h in the presence of brefeldin-A (GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences), which prevents the transport of cytokines and transcription factors out of the cell [12 (link),33 (link),41 (link)]. Cells were washed and surface stained for CD4, and CXCR6 surface receptors (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). After permeabilization and fixation (BioLegend), the cells were stained with intracellular cytokines (anti-IL-9, anti-IL-10, and anti-IL-17A; BioLegend) and transcription factors (anti-FOXP3, anti-GATA3, and anti-Helios; BioLegend). The proportions of CXCR6+FOXP3+, CXCR6+Helios+, CD4+GATA3+, CD4+IL-9+, CXCR6+IL-10+, and CD4+IL-17A+ cells were acquired via a FC 500 flow cytometer and analyzed using CXP software (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Liver Leukocyte Isolation and Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leukocytes were isolated from the liver in the way as described previously40 (link). For flow cytometry, cells were stained for surface antigens with anti-NK1.1, anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8α, anti-CD19, anti-CD44, anti-CD62L (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), or/and for intracellular antigens with anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-17A, anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-10 (BioLegend). IgG isotype controls (Biolegend) were used in parallel. To detect Treg cells, cells were stained with anti-NK1.1, anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD25 at 4 °C for 30 minutes; and incubated with anti-mouse Foxp3 antibodies according to the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience). Methods were the sameas those described previously9 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Intracellular Marker Characterization of PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For additional characterization of intracellular markers PBMCs were suspended in culture medium consisting of RPMI 1640 (Biochrom), 5% human AB serum (CC pro), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Biochrom). PBMCs were stimulated with 10 ng/ml phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 µg/ml ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of 0.2 µM Monensin (Biomol) for 6 hours prior to analysis. First, cell surface markers were stained as described above. Before the characterization of intracellular markers, cells were fixed with freshly prepared fixation concentrate, and permeabilized with wash-permeabilization concentrate (Fixation/Permeabilisation Buffer Set, eBioscience). Subsequently, cells were stained using fluorescence-labeled anti-IFN-gamma, anti-IL-17A (BioLegend), anti-IL-4 (BD Bioscience), anti-FoxP3 antibody (Miltenyi Biotec) or isotype-matched irrelevant antibody (BD Biosciences) (Suppl. Fig. 6). After the staining procedure, cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Cells were measured on a LSR-Fortessa (BD Bioscience) and evaluated by FACS-Diva Software (BD Bioscience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Murine Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens and lymph nodes were isolated from mice in each group, and 1 × 106 cells were incubated with PMA (50 ng/mL) plus ionomycin (500 ng/mL) for 5 h at 37 °C. The harvested cells were fixed and permeabilized (CytoFix/CytoPerm kit; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and stained with fluorescence-labeled anti-CD4 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), anti-IL-17A (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-TNF-α (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-IFN-γ (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), anti-Foxp3 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD11b (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and anti-Gr-1 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) monoclonal antibodies. The expression of these markers was analyzed using a FACSVerse instrument and FlowJo 10.6.1 software (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of Murine T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We isolated T lymphocytes from spleens. After preparing a single cell suspension and counting the cells, we used magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec) to isolate CD4+ cells. Isolation was performed in the dark, and the total number of cells added to the LS column was restricted to 1 × 108. Anti-CD4, anti-CD25, anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-17A, and anti-Foxp3 antibodies were purchased from BioLegend. Intracellular straining for IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-17A and Foxp3 was performed using the Prem/Fix Buffer set, according to the manufacturer’s instructions [24 (link)]. After staining, cells were suspended in PBS + 1% FBS and analyzed using an Accuri C6 flow cytometer from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA). We also detected the serum IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-17 levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing CNS-infiltrating Cells in EAE Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize CNS-infiltrating cells at day 30 post-EAE induction, mice were euthanized by exsanguination by transcardial perfusion with PBS under isoflurane anesthetization. Lymphocytes were isolated from the spinal cord by Dounce homogenization to generate a single-cell suspension that was filtered with a 70-μm strainer followed by Percoll gradient (37%/70%) centrifugation and collection of the interphase. For intracellular cytokine analysis, cells were stimulated with 20 ng/ml PMA, 1 μg/ml of ionomycin and 1 mg/ml brefeldin A (Golgi Plug reagent, BD Bioscience) for 4 h. Cells were stained with the UV-Blue Live/Dead fixable stain (Thermo Fisher, USA) followed by surface staining with antibodies against CD45, CD11b, CD19, TCRβ, CD4, CD8, and TCRγδ (Biolegend, USA). For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were fixed, permeabilized with 0.05% saponin, and labeled with anti-IL-17A, anti-IFNγ, and anti-GM-CSF antibodies (Biolegend, USA). Cells were analyzed using a Cytek Aurora (Cytek Biosciences, USA). Spectral unmixing was performed with appropriate single-color controls using autofluorescence correction from an unstained group control. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software, version 10.8.1 (Tree Star Inc, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiplex ELISA for Cytokine Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ELISA plates were coated with 2 µg/ml capture (purified) antibodies overnight at 4°C. Wells were washed three times with TBST and blocked for 1 h with 1% bovine serum albumin. Block was removed and recombinant protein standards and samples were incubated for 2 h. Wells were washed three times and 2 µg/ml of biotynilated antibody was incubated for 1 h. Wells were washed three times and a 1:1000 dilution of HRP‐Avidin antibody was incubated for 40 min. Wells were washed three times and 75 µl TMB was added. The reaction was stopped with 75 µl 10% sulfuric acid and plates read at 450OD. Cytokine concentrations were determined from recombinant protein standard curve. Interleukin‐17A (IL‐17A) (576002), interferon‐γ IFN‐γ (575304), IL‐12 (572109), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α) (570109), and IL‐6 (570809), anti‐IL‐17A (506901), anti‐IFN‐γ (505701), anti‐IL‐12 (501801), anti‐TNF‐α (502801), anti‐IL‐6 (79026)biotinylated anti‐IL‐17A (507001), biotinylated anti‐IFN‐γ (505803), biotinylated anti‐IL‐12 (508801), biotinylated anti‐TNF‐α (502903), and biotinylated anti‐IL‐6 (79027); and HRP‐Aviden (405103) antibodies were purchased from Biolegend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Lacrimal and Salivary Glands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lacrimal and salivary glands were removed from NOD or recipient NOD scid mice, fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Tissue sections (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and images were analyzed with a light microscope. The histological score was determined as the number of infiltrated foci as follows:score 0, no foci; score 1, less than 1 focus; score 2, 2-5 foci; score 3, 6-9 foci; score 4, over 10 foci. A focus was defined as an infiltrated region (0.04 mm2) seen within the histological section. For immunohistochemical analysis, cryosections (5 μm) of lacrimal and salivary gland tissue were stained with PE anti-CD3 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA), anti- LPAR1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) or anti-IL-17a (Biolegend, San Diego CA, USA) antibodies and 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Images were captured using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Munich, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Murine Spleen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens from mice were collected, embedded in Tissue-Tek (4583 BioLab) and snap-frozen on dry ice. Frozen sections (thickness, 5 μm) were fixed in acetone. Before staining, sections were blocked with 5% rat serum for 30 min. Possible biotin- or streptavidin-binding sites were blocked using the Avidin/Biotin Blocking Kit from Vector. Afterward, the sections were stained with various antibodies. The following fluorochrome- or biotin-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies and reagents were used: anti-CD3 (17A2; 1:50), anti-IL-17A (TC11-18H10.1; 1:20), anti-RORγt (B2D; 1:20), anti-IgD (11-26c-2a; 1:50), rat IgG1 isotype-matched control antibody (RTK2071) and rat IgG2a isotype (RTK2758) (all from BioLegend); and anti-CD21/35(8D9; 1:50) (from eBioscience). Sections were mounted in fluorescent mounting medium (Dako) and analyzed with an Eclipse-80i microscope (Nikon). Pictures are presented with pseudocolors (as indicated in figures) by NIS elements software BR3.0 (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!