The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using nano lc 1000

1

Phosphopeptide Fractionation and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphopeptide samples were fractionated followed a described protocol46 (link). Vacuum-dried peptides were dissolved in pH 10 buffer (10 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 10, adjusted by NH4OH) and subjected to pH 10 C18 reverse-phase column chromatography. Peptides were eluted with a step gradient of 150 μL each of 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 30, and 35% ACN (pH 10), pooled into six pools and vacuum-dried for nano-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem MS.
Peptides were loaded onto a 10-cm column with a 150-μM inner diameter, packed in-house with 1.9 μM C18, and subjected to nano-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem MS analysis by using a nano-LC 1000 coupled with an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). The peptides were separated with a 75-min discontinuous gradient of 2–24%, 4–24%, or 8–26% ACN/0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 800 nL/minute. The mass spectrometer was set to data-dependent mode, the precursor MS spectrum was scanned at 375–1300 m/z with 240k resolution at 400 m/z (2 × 106 AGC target), and the 25 strongest ions were fragmented via collision-induced dissociation with 35 normalized collision energy and 1 m/z isolation width and detected by using an ion trap with 30 s of dynamic exclusion time, 1 × 104 AGC target, and 100 ms of maximum injection time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mouse Serum Proteome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse serum was pre-cleared by Proteome Purify 2 Mouse Serum Immunodepletion resin (MIDR002, RnD Systems) to remove albumin and immunoglobulins. Depleted serum was subjected to Mass Spectrometry-based whole proteome analysis [15 (link),16 (link)]. Briefly, trypsinized serum peptides were extracted by 50% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid and 80% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid solution. The proteome was profiled by nano-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis with a nano-LC1000 coupled to a Thermo Q-Exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The relative amount was normalized as the intensity-based absolute quantification algorithm and normalized to the intensity-based fraction of the total (iFOT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nano LC-MS Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty components were dissolved in 20 µl of nano LC A solution. A 2 µl sample was injected into the column gradient and eluted, analyzed and identified by Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometry. The sample was analyzed by a Thermo Nano LC 1000 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system, and an Acclaim PepMap® 100 C18, 3 µm, 100 Å (75 µm × 2 cm) sample column and an Acclaim PepMap® RSLC C18, 2 µm, 100 Å (50 µm × 15 cm) analysis column were applied in the mass spectrometric analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification and Analysis of MYC Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MYC-binding protein complexes purified from GEN2.2 cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% TRITON-100, 10% glycerol supplemented with a complete protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma)) and subjected to ultracentrifugation. Cleared lysates were incubated overnight with protein G agarose beads (Pierce) with the indicated antibodies. Beads were washed extensively with lysis buffer, separated on a 4–20% gradient polyacrylamide gel, and stained with Coomassie blue (Sigma). Unstimulated GEN2.2 cells were lysed. Nuclear extracts were fractionated as shown in Figure 4A and then immunoprecipitated with MYC specific antibody and rabbit IgG control. Then, immune complexes from MYC-IP were separated on a 4–20% Gradient SDS-PAGE gel (Thermo Scientific) and stained with Coomassie blue for visualization. All bands were in–gel digested with trypsin, and the proteins were identified by nanoflow LC-MS/MS analysis with a nano-LC1000 (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Thermo ORbitrap Velos™ (Thermo Scientific) mass spectrometer. Acquired MS spectra were processed by BioWorks software to convert data into peptide and protein composition information. All bands were analyzed by liquid chromatography-MS at the Proteomics Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomic Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment was carried out using Nano-LC 1000 LC-MS / MS with a proxeon easy NLC 1000 coupled with a mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Q exactive, United States) for fraction separation. Trypsinized fractions were loaded into buffer A (0.1% formic acid) connected to the reverse phase capture column of the C18 reverse phase analysis column, and separated using a linear gradient of buffer B (84% ACN and 0.1% formic acid). The eluent was analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in Q exactive after spraying via a nanoelectrospray source at 2.0 kV electrospray voltage. MS data were obtained using a data-dependent mode that dynamically selected the 20 most intense precursor ions present in the survey scan (350–18,000 M/Z) for higher-energy C-trap dissociation fragmentation. In the Orbitrap mass analyzer, survey scans were acquired at a resolution of 70,000 (full width at half maxima, FWHM) and ion fragments were detected at a resolution of 17,000 (FWHM). The collision energy was 28% in the MS survey scan with 10.0 s of dynamic exclusion (De Mandal et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanoscale LC-MS/MS of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four injections were made into a NanoLC 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) interfaced to the LTQ OrbiTrap elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) via a nanosource. The samples were loaded onto a 150 µm × 2 cm peptrap 300 A C18 pre-column (ReproSil-Pur, Dr. Maisch GmbH) in solvent A (99.9% water/0.1% formic acid) and desalted for 10 min. The peptides were eluted into a 75 µm × 25 cm 100 A C18 analytical column (self-packed; ReproSil-Pur, Dr. Maisch GmbH) and separated with a linear gradient of 5-30% solvent B (99.9% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid) in 5 min, and then 69% solvent B for 115 min. The flow rate used was 500 nl/min. The survey scans were acquired in the OrbiTrap with a resolving power of 60,000 m/z 400 and an automated gain control target level of 1×106. The 25 most abundant ions were selected for fragmentation using collision-induced dissociation in the linear ion trap. The precursor ions were fragmented with He gas for 30 ms with a normalized collision energy of 35. The dynamic exclusion parameters were set to exclude ions previously selected for fragmentation for 1 min. All data were acquired in reduced profile mode to accommodate further downstream processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectrometry Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conditioned medium was subjected to unbiased mass-spec profiling as previously described (71 (link)). Briefly, samples were denatured and digested, followed by extraction with 50% acetonitrile and 2% formic acid. Vacuum-dried peptides were subjected to reverse phase column chromatography with a micro-pipette tip C18 column and fractionated with stepwise ACN gradient into different elution groups. Eluent was pooled and vacuum-dried for analysis with a nano-LC 1000 coupled with an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Data were analyzed with Proteome Discoverer 2.1 interface (ThermoFisher Scientific) and detected peptides were assigned into gene products by Py Grouper and Tackle analysis flatform from iSpec(75 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomic Analysis of Mouse Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detailed procedure has been described.20 Briefly, liver tissue was homogenized in a lysis buffer (50 mM NH5CO3 and 1 mM CaCl2). After denaturation and subsequent trypsinization, peptides were extracted by 50% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid and 80% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid solution. The hepatic proteome was profiled by nano‐liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS‐MS) analysis with a nano‐LC1000 coupled to a Thermo Q‐Exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Obtained MS‐MS spectra were searched against the target‐decoy mouse Reference Sequence database in the Proteome Discoverer 1.4 interface (PD1.4; Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the Mascot algorithm (Mascot 2.4; Matrix Science, Boston, MA). The relative amount was calculated by the intensity‐based absolute quantification algorithm and normalized to the intensity‐based fraction of the total.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Proteome Analysis by Q Exactive Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry was performed using a Thermo Nano LC 1000 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system with Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 coupled to a Q Exactive. An Acclaim PepMap® 100 C18 (3 µm, 100 Å, 75 µm × 2 cm) trap column and an Acclaim PepMap® RSLC C18 (2 µm, 100 Å, 50 µm × 15 cm) analysis column were used in the mass spectrometric analysis. Trypsin digested fractions were reconstituted and eluted from the trap column and then loaded onto a reversed-phase analytical column. The eluent was sprayed via an NSI source at a 1.8 kV electrospray voltage and then analyzed by MS/MS in Q Exactive. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, automatically switching between MS and MS/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!