The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mascot software

Manufactured by Matrix Science
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Japan

Mascot software is a bioinformatics tool designed for the identification of proteins from mass spectrometry data. It provides a platform for the analysis and interpretation of peptide mass fingerprinting and tandem mass spectrometry data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

278 protocols using mascot software

1

Peptide Identification by MS/MS and MASCOT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An MS/MS ion search was performed using MASCOT software (version 2.4.1, Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA), and peptide fragment data were acquired from the peptide peaks in ESI-MS through ESI-MS/MS. Trypsin was selected as the enzyme of choice, allowing for a maximum of two potential missed cleavage sites. The instrument type was ESI-TRAP, and the peptide fragments were searched against the database using MASCOT software (version 2.4.1, Matrix Science) and FASTA search engine. The search was limited to Mus musculus taxonomy within the NCBInr and UniprotKB databases. Mass tolerance was set to ± 10 ppm for peptides and ± 0.8 Da for fragments, and high-scoring peptides were defined as those with a score greater than the default significance threshold in MASCOT (p < 0.05, peptide score > 55).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Proteomic Analysis of Nanoparticle Toxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Image analysis was carried out using an Image MasterTM 2D Platinum software (GE Healthcare Life Science, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). To compare the densities of protein spots induced by bulk or nano ZnOs, more than 25 spots were landmarked and normalized. In-gel digestion of protein spots from Coomassie Blue stained gels was performed as previously described [51 (link)]. Prior to mass spectrometric analysis, the peptide solutions were desalted using a reversed-phase column [52 (link)]. The eluted peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) on a nano ACQUITY UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) directly coupled to a Finnigan LCQ DECA iontrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Spectra were acquired and processed using the MASCOT software (Matrix Science, London, UK). The individual spectra from MS/MS were processed using a SEQUEST software (Thermo Quest, San Jose, CA, USA). Only significant hits as defined by the MASCOT software (Matrix Science, London, UK) probability analysis were taken.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mass Spectrometry Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An MS/MS ion search was assigned as the ion search preference in the MASCOT software (version 2.4.1, Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA). Peptide fragment files were obtained from the peptide peaks in ESI–MS by ESI–MS/MS. Trypsin was selected as an enzyme with a maximum of two missed cleavage sites. ESI-TRAP was selected as the instrument type. The peptide fragments were searched based on the database using the MASCOT software (version 2.4.1, Matrix Science) and FASTA search engine, and the search was limited to Mus musculus taxonomy in NCBInr and UniprotKB/swissprot databases. The mass tolerance was set at ± 10 ppm and ± 0.8 Da for the peptides and fragments, respectively. High scoring was defined as those greater than the default significance threshold in MASCOT (p < 0.05, peptide score, > 55).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Identification and Isotopic Enrichment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein identification, all the spectra obtained from the mass spectrometer were transformed into mzML file format using ProteoWizard MSconvert Version 3.0.18116 (http://proteowizard.sourceforge.net/tools), and the MZML files were searched using Mascot software (Matrix Science, London, UK) version 2.3 against the mouse subset of the UniProt protein database released on June 29th, 2016 (containing 149,730 entries) with cysteine carbamidomethylation as fixed and methionine oxidation as variable modifications and trypsin digestion with a maximum of two missed cleavages per peptide. The intensities of peptide’s isotopomers in the proteins of interest at each time-point were extracted from high-resolution full scan (MS1) spectra of analyzed peptides using d2Ome software24 (link). The 2H- enrichment values were calculated using a script written in Python.
The results were summarized using means and standard deviations and were compared between groups using two-sample t-tests. Mean differences between groups with 95%-confidence intervals were presented. To assess correlations between methods, Pearson correlations were used. All calculations assume a 0.05 significance level. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA) software (version 5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis of Yersinia pestis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Δail mutant was grown overnight at 28°C in LB broth with aeration. Cells were diluted 1:100 into fresh LB broth, incubated for 24 h at 37°C, and prepared as described for the supernatant protein precipitation as described above. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (72 (link)) and stained with Coomassie blue. A 2-mm-wide vertical strip spanning each lane of gel-resolved proteins was excised, divided into five parts, destained, and trypsinized (24 (link), 75 (link), 76 (link)). MS/MS analysis using a Waters Nanoacquity ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) unit (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) was performed as described previously (24 (link), 77 (link)). A ProteinLynx Global Server 2.2 and Protein Expression Informatics System software version 1.0 were used for MS/MS spectral analysis, peptide sequencing, and protein identification. MS/MS data were compared to the protein sequence databases of Y. pestis KIM from the University of Wisconsin (http://www.genome.wisc.edu/sequencing/pestis.htm) and Y. pestis CO92 from the Sanger Institute (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Y_pestis/). Results were analyzed using Mascot software (Matrix Science, London, UK). Gene identities (ID) of protein products detected were recorded compared to the Y. pestis KIM genome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identification of Myc-tagged GKRP Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Myc-tagged GKRP was immunoprecipitated from HeLa cells using an anti-Myc antibody. After immunoblot, protein bands were excised from stained one-dimensional electrophoresis gels and destained with 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 50% acetonitrile. In-gel digestion of dried gel pieces was performed using sequencing grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer overnight at 37 °C. The tryptic peptides were desalted using a GELoader tip (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) packed with 1.5 μg of POROS® 20 R2 resin (PerSpective Biosystems, Ramsey, MN, USA) and applied to a C18 RP-HPLC column (75 m × 150 mm). An Agilent 1100 Series LC system was then used to separate the trypsin-digested peptides, which were eluted with a 0–40% acetonitrile gradient for 60 min. followed by analysis using a Finnigan LCQ Deca (ThermoQuest, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source. Spray and tube lens voltages were 1.9 kV and 40 V, respectively. The capillary temperature was maintained at 250 °C at 5 V. The individual LC-MS/MS spectra were processed using TurboSEQUEST software (ThermoQuest) and the sequences were searched in NCBI databases using MASCOT software (Matrix Science Ltd., London, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomic Analysis of Tardigrade Stress Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heat soluble proteomics was conducted as previously described [30 (link)]. Briefly, approximately 3000 individuals were collected from the wild and cleaned as described above and homogenized using BioMasher II (Nippi) in PBS (Nippon Gene) on ice with protease inhibitors (Roche). The lysate was heated at 92 °C for 20 min, and the soluble fraction was collected by taking the supernatant after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 20 min. Proteins were digested with trypsin, and tryptic peptides were separated and identified with an UltiMate 3000 nanoLC pump (Dionex Co., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and an LTQ Orbitrap XL ETD (Thermo Electron, Waltham, MA, USA). Corresponding peptide sequences were retrieved from six frame translation data of our initial genome assembly using MASCOT software (Matrix Science) [79 (link)]. Candidates were further screened with the following conditions: (1) lack of conservation in other tardigrades or metazoans and (2) high mRNA expression (TPM > 100) in the tun state. We then predicted the structural features using the Fold Index [80 (link)] and DISOPRED [81 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomic Analysis of Rice Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MS/MS spectra were searched in the NCBInr Oryza sativa sequence databases and UniProtKB/Swiss‐Prot database using the MASCOT software (Matrix Science, UK; version 2.3.02). The search parameters were as follows: (1) allowed one missed cleavage in the protein trypsin digests; (2) fixed modifications of carbamidomethylation at cysteine, variable modifications of oxidation at methionine and iTRAQ 8‐plex at tyrosine; (3) peptide tolerance was set at ± 0.02 Da and MS/MS tolerance was set at ± 0.05 Da. The peptide charge was set as Mr, and the monoisotopic mass was chosen. The iTRAQ 8‐plex was chosen for quantification during the search. The search results were filtered before data exportation. The filters were used for protein identification with the following options: significance threshold of p < 0.05 (with 95% confidence) and ion score or expected cutoff of < 0.05 (with 95% confidence). For protein quantification, the filters were set as follows: (1) “median” was chosen for the protein ratio type; (2) the minimum precursor charge was set to 2, minimum peptides were set to 2, and only unique peptides were used for quantitation; and (3) normalization by median intensities, and outliers were removed automatically.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Identification and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MS/MS spectra were searched against the SwissProt human database (www.uniprot.org, 20,227 entries) using Mascot software (version 2.3.02; Matrix Science, Ltd., London, UK). The parent and fragment ion mass tolerances were 0.050 Da. The carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a fixed modification, and the number of miscleavage sites allowed was ≤2. Scaffold software (version Scaffold_4.0.7, Proteome Software, Inc., Portland, OR, USA) was used to filter the results. Protein identification was accepted at a false discovery rate (FDR) <1.0% by analyzing the levels of proteins and peptides formed by ≥2 unique peptides. The identified proteins were quantified based on iTRAQ reporter ion intensities of unique peptides. The proteins containing quantification values in all channels in all three runs were considered suitable for quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Sequence Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
These data were then used to search the NCBI non-identical protein sequence database using MASCOT software (Matrix Science), and statistically significant hits were recorded together with the number of peptides and percentage coverage of the protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!