The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism version 5.0c

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

Prism version 5.0c is a data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It is designed for scientists and researchers to analyze, visualize, and present their data. The software provides a range of statistical and graphing tools to help users interpret their experimental results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using prism version 5.0c

1

Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Discrimination Measures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and PRISM Version 5.0C (Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Mean is given for normally distributed data, and median for non-normally distributed data. The Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was used for non-normally distributed data to assess the difference between the groups. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as a measure of reliability. Cronbach’s alpha for EMQs was adjusted for a 50-question test using the Spearman-Brown prediction formula. Item-total score point-biserial was calculated as a measure of discrimination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Antimicrobial Effects of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures of the various streptococcal strains were diluted 1:50 into 5 ml TH+Y (containing spectinomycin for AR01+pAR107), and grown to OD600 0.5. The cultures were diluted 1:105 and 100 μl of the diluted sample was mixed with 100 μl medium containing twice the final concentration of peptide. For overnight endpoint assays, the samples were placed in a 96-well plate and incubated stationary for 16 h at 37°C, at which point samples were resuspended using a multichannel pipette, and absorption at 600 nm was measured using a SpectraMax Plus plate reader (Molecular Devices); experiments were carried out in triplicates. For the CFU-based assays, samples were prepared in a similar manner, however they were rotated in microfuge tubes for 3 h at 37°C, and then serially diluted and plated for CFU quantification; experiments were done in duplicates. The CFU count of each peptide-treated sample was divided by that of the equivalent untreated sample to yield the final result. Data analysis was done using Prism version 5.0c (GraphPad Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of FGF23 and Iron Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data presentation and P values for statistical significance were described in our previous study [22 (link)]. Statistical analysis for comparisons between two groups of normally distributed variables and non-normally distributed variables were performed using the Student’s t-test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively. For nominal variables, χ2 test was used for comparisons between two or more groups. Correlations of non-parametric data were calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation test. Associations between i-FGF23 and doses of intravenous ferrotherapy over 24 weeks were assessed by multiple linear regression analysis. Associations between TSAT and ferritin, estimated by 4 time points, and i-FGF23 were assessed using a multivariate repeated measurement analysis approach.
Data were analyzed using JMP Pro version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), Stata/MP 13.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and Prism version 5.0c (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis Methods in Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were done using the Mann-Whitney U test, Student t-test, two-way ANOVA test or Spearman’s correlation, as appropriate. For comparing quantitative endpoints between two experimental groups, we applied the Mann-Whitney U test (also known as the Wilcoxon rank-sum test). For evaluating association between two dichotomous variables (such as loss of function status of two genes), we applied the Student t-test. For evaluating the influence of two different categorical independent variables on one continuous dependent variable (as for volumetric analysis between treatment groups), we applied the two-way ANOVA test. For evaluating the correlation of expression of two independent groups, we used Spearman’s correlation. For survival analysis, we computed the Kaplan-Meier curves for two groups, above-median and below-median, based on the expression of the indicated gene, and used the log-rank test to compare survival rates between these two groups. Prism version 5.0c (GraphPad Software) was used for Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, two-way ANOVA test and Spearman’s correlation; and R v3.1.1’s survival package for survival analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as averages with 95% confidence intervals. All data were statistically analyzed using PRISM version 5.0c software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was assigned at values of p < 0.05 (95% confidence interval).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating RecQ Helicase Binding to G4 DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
G4 DNA containing a 3′ FAM modification (F-G4) was solubilized to 50 µM in G4 folding buffer [10 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM KCl]. Using a heat block, the DNA was heated to 95 °C for 5 min, after which the block was removed from heat and allowed to cool to room temperature over approximately 4 h. Folded DNA was then stored at 4 °C. RecQ proteins were serially diluted from 20,000 to 0.6 nM in G4 binding buffer [20 mM Tris·HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin, 4% (vol/vol) glycerol], then incubated with 5 nM F-G4 for 30 min at room temperature in a total volume of 100 µL. The fluorescence anisotropy of each sample was measured at 25 °C with a Beacon 2000 fluorescence polarization system. Measurements are reported in duplicate and error bars represent 1 SEM. Binding affinities and uncertainties were determined using Prism version 5.0c (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Duplex binding assays were performed as the G4 binding assays using a 3ʹ FAM-labeled ssDNA (duplex 1) annealed to an unlabeled 18mer (duplex 2) to create a substrate with an 18-bp duplex with 3ʹ overhang of 12 nucleotides.21 (link) Duplex binding assays were performed in triplicate and error bars represent 1 SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Adoptive Transfer of Plasma Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow or splenocytes were enriched for B cells via EasySep B-cell enrichment kit (Stemcell Technologies) and CD138+B220 PCs were FACS sorted from C57BL/6 mice 2 months post immunization. Marrow or splenic PCs (105) were then transferred via tail-vein injection into cohorts of sex-matched μMT mice or were measured for NP22CGG specificity via ELISPOT. Serum antibody titres were measured by ELISA at days 7, 14, 21, 30 and 60. Plates were coated with 20 μg ml−1 NP22CGG (or 2 μg ml−1 anti-IgG or -IgM for standard wells) and blocked with 3% BSA. Sera from recipient μMT mice was serially diluted in PBS and incubated for 2 h. Plates were then treated with either anti-IgG–horseradish peroxidase or -IgM-biotin, followed by incubation with streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase for IgM plates (Southern Biotechnology). TMB substrate (Pierce) was added for 30 s and then the reaction stopped with 0.16 M sulfuric acid. Plates were read at 450 nm. PC numbers in the bone marrow and spleen were assayed by ELISPOT at days 7, 14, 30 and at 2 months post adoptive transfer as previously described, or at 2 months for bone marrow transfer cohorts. Half-lives were determined by linear regression of transferred cells, comparing the slopes for statistically significant differences (Graphpad Prism Version 5.0c).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intergroup Comparison with Cox Regression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prism, version 5.0c (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA). Results were analyzed using the intergroup comparison with Cox regression analysis. The level of acceptable significance was set at p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!