The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lc480 real time cycler

Manufactured by Roche

The LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System is a flexible and efficient instrument for real-time PCR applications. It features a 96-well microplate format and uses optical detection technology to measure fluorescence signals during the amplification process. The LightCycler 480 is designed to provide reliable and consistent results for a wide range of real-time PCR experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using lc480 real time cycler

1

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis of Metal-Stressed Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis, untreated or metal-stressed bacteria (LB supplemented with 400 μM ZnSO4, 400 μM CuSO4, or 400 μM ZnSO4 + 400 μM CuSO4) were harvested at mid log-phase and lysed in QiaZol (Qiagen) as described previously [55 (link), 56 (link)]. Following the addition of chloroform and phase separation, RNA was extracted and purified using a PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total RNA samples were treated with DNase I (Roche) and qRT-PCR performed using the SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a LC480 Real-Time Cycler (Roche). Transcription levels of genes were corrected to those obtained for GAPDH prior to normalization to the transcription levels observed for untreated A. baumannii cultures. Primer sequences are listed in Additional file 2. Results are the mean (± SEM) of at least three independent experiments, with the statistical significance determined using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pneumococcal Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pneumococci were grown as for the ICP–MS analyses, then 500 μl of the culture was mixed with 1 ml of RNA Protect (Qiagen). RNA was extracted and purified using an RNeasy Protect Bacteria Mini Kit (Qiagen) after enzymatic lysis using lysozyme and mutanolysin, all according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNase I treatment (Roche) was performed followed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR using SuperScript III (Invitrogen) with a Roche LC480 Real-Time Cycler. The transcription levels of genes analysed were normalized to those obtained for 16S rRNA. Primer sequences are in Supplementary Table 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Relative Real-Time qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were initially grown overnight on BA plates at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in 1 mL of CDM + 0.5% glucose or raffinose to a final OD600 of 0.2. Suspensions were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 30 min. RNA was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy Minikit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Differences in levels of gene expression were determined using one-step relative real-time qRT-PCR in a Roche LC480 real-time cycler, as previously described (Minhas et al., 2019 (link)). The specific primers used for the different genes are listed in Table 2 and were used at a final concentration of 200 nM per reaction. Primers specific for gyrA mRNA were used an internal control. Amplification data were analyzed using the comparative critical threshold (2-∆∆CT) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). Assays were performed in triplicate with a minimum of two independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using two-tailed Student’s t test; P values < 0.05 were defined as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Relative Gene Expression Analysis by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in levels of gene expression were assayed by one-step relative quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) in a Roche LC480 real-time cycler essentially as described previously (30 (link)). The specific primers used for the various genes are listed in Table 4 and were used at a final concentration of 200 nM per reaction. As an internal control, primers specific for 16S rRNA were employed. Amplification data were analyzed using the comparative critical threshold cycle (2−ΔΔCT) method (31 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Real-time qRT-PCR Analysis of luxS Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were grown overnight on BA plates at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were harvested, washed and resuspended in 1 mL of CDM to a final OD600 of 0.2. Bacterial suspensions were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. RNA extractions were carried our using a Qiagen RNeasy Minikit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Differences in gene expression levels were determined using one-step relative real-time qRT-PCR in a Roche LC480 real-time cycler, as described previously (Minhas et al., 2019 (link)). Primers used for luxS and gyrA (internal control) are listed in Table 1 and were used at a final concentration of 200 nM per reaction. Amplification data were analyzed using the comparative critical threshold (2-ΔΔCT) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)). Assays were performed in triplicate and statistical analyses were performed using two-tailed Student’s t test; P values < 0.05 were deemed as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptome Analysis of S. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

S. pneumoniae D39 for transcription analyses were cultured as described above. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,750 x g for 15 minutes at 8°C and subsequently lysed using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and chloroform. Following phase separation by centrifugation, RNA was purified using an RNA isolation kit (Ambion) and treated with DNase I (NEB). The RNA was reverse transcribed using random hexamers and qPCR was performed using a Roche LC480 Real-Time Cycler, as described previously [59] . The primers are listed in Table S1 and were used at a final concentration of 200 nM per reaction. 16S rRNA was employed as a control. Amplification data were analyzed using the comparative critical threshold (2−▵▵CT) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Isolation and Quantification from Streptococcus pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For isolation of RNA, 500 μl of a S. pneumoniae culture at an OD600 of 0.3, grown in C+Y media at 37°C with 5% CO2, was mixed with 1 ml of RNA Protect (Qiagen). RNA was extracted and purified using an RNeasy Bacteria Mini Kit (Qiagen) after enzymatic lysis using lysozyme and mutanolysin, as described previously (Eijkelkamp et al., 2014a (link), 2015 (link), 2016 (link); Plumptre et al., 2014a (link),b (link); Begg et al., 2015 (link)). The total RNA samples were treated with DNase I (Roche) and qRT-PCR was carried out using a SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a LC480 Real-Time Cycler (Roche). Transcription levels of genes analyzed were normalized to those obtained for 16S rRNA. Primer sequences are available in Table S1. Results are representative of at least four independent samples and the statistical difference was examined by an unpaired Student t-test (Graphpad Prism 6.0c).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of AI-2 Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For qRT-PCR analyses, cells were grown in CDM-Gal to an OD600 of 0.2 and treated with or without 10 μM AI-2 for 30 min. RNA was extracted from triplicate cultures as described above, but individual rather than pooled extracts were analyzed. Gene expression was assayed by one-step relative real-time qRT-PCR in a Roche LC480 real-time cycler essentially as described previously (40 (link)). The specific primers used for the various genes are listed in Table 3, and they were used at a final concentration of 200 nM. As an internal control, primers specific for 16S rRNA were employed. Amplification data were analyzed by the comparative critical threshold (2−ΔΔCT) method (46 (link)) and are presented as total expression relative to that of the 16S rRNA gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!