The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas package 9

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS package 9.4 is a comprehensive software suite designed for data management, analysis, and reporting. It provides a range of tools and functionalities for users to effectively handle and interpret complex data sets. The core function of SAS package 9.4 is to enable efficient data processing, statistical analysis, and the creation of customizable reports and visualizations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

15 protocols using sas package 9

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The general linear models (GLM) procedure, following the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality, was employed in SAS package 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to analyse data from all experiments. Significant differences among groups were determined using Sheffé’s test. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Zygote Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M. of at least 20 zygotes per experimental group. All analysis were performed in at least three independent repetitions. The general linear models (GLM) procedure in SAS package 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used, followed by Sheffe’s test and Duncan’s multiple range test for zygote analysis and evaluation of early embryonic development, respectively. P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Effects of Dietary Supplements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values are expressed as the mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). Data analyses were processed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SAS package 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) in a completely randomized design. Duncan's multiple range test was performed to compare values of individual treatment when the F-value was significant (P<0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Surgical Procedures and Kidney Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using the analysis of variance for continuous data and the chi-square exact test for categorical variables. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparison analyses. The generalized linear model analysis (gamma with log link) was used to make comparisons between surgical procedures and operative results. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis was used to make comparisons between surgical procedures and longitudinal data on eGFR. The risk ratio was used to make comparisons between surgical procedures and incidence of complication rates. The analyses were performed using donor sex and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy as adjustment factors. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SAS package 9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Soil Microbial Dynamics in Trichoderma Biocontrol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This experiment was conducted as a completely randomized block design (moisture levels and presence of ThzID1-M3 pellet treated as factors, and sampling times as blocks). All analyses were performed using SAS package 9.0 (SAS Institute Inc., USA). Recoverable numbers of bacteria, Trichoderma spp., and ThzID1-M3 were standardized by gravimetric soil moisture and log-transformed prior to analysis. Analysis of variance using PROC GLM was performed for analyzing microbial populations and ThzID1-M3 biomass in soil, and for ThzID1-M3 DNA estimates in sclerotia, with significant differences at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analyzing Milk Composition Traits in Cows

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics for milk composition traits (FP, CPP, MU) and ECPU were performed for 634 cows using the MEANS procedure of SAS package 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. 2013, Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Four-way ANOVA Analysis of Crop Accessions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data collected were subjected to four-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance): pot (accessions, strains, soil status, and season), field (accessions, strains, locations, and seasons) statistical analysis system (SAS) package 9.4, and means were separated using the Duncan Multiple Range Test (Dmrt) at p ≤ 0.05 (Zatybekov et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data from the in vitro and in vivo experiments were analyzed using the general linear model procedure of the SAS package 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Carey, NC, USA). The general linear model for the statistical analysis is as follows:
where yij is the jth observation in the ith treatment, μ is the overall mean, τi is the fixed effect of the ith treatment, and eij is the unexplained random effect on the jth observation for the ith treatment. Differences between treatments were analyzed using the Tukey test, with statistical significance declared at p<0.05 and a trend discussed at 0.05≤p<0.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After collecting the baseline data, all patients were divided into either an intervention group or the control group by coded randomizations by an independent person. SAS package 9.4 was used to produce computerized random number. An independent, blinded statistician who was not involved in the research process prepared and managed the random number table. In the treatment process, subjects were divided into two groups. Intervention group and the control group did not know which group they were in. None of the MSI numbers participated in data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for a completely randomized block design with SAS package 9.4 software and the differences in means were determined by the least significant differences (LSD). Duncan’s multiple-range test was performed at P ≤ 0.05 on each of the significant variables measured. P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!