The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using item 5

1

Ultrastructural Analysis of Transfected Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline, fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated through an increasing ethanol series and flat-embedded in Agar resin. Thin sections (70 nm) were cut on a Reichert-Jung Ultracut E ultramicrotome and stained using uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were examined and photographed using a JEM-1011 electron microscope (JEOL Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). Fine structure measurements/observations were performed using a Veleta camera and iTEM 5.1 software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Negative Staining and Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral samples for negative staining were processed by placing a drop of the sample on a carbon-coated copper, furthermore, the grid was stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. The samples were observed with a JEOL JEM (Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) 1200EX electron microscope operating at 80 kV. Fine structure measurements/observations were performed using a Veleta camera and iTEM 5.1 software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Münster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Wall Ultrastructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type, ΔrlmA, and complementing strains were gown in liquid YG medium during 24 hr. Cells were processed essentially as described previously (Bom et al. 2015 (link)) with modifications. Briefly, the mycelia were fixed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2.5% (v/v) of glutaraldehyde for 24 hr at 4°. Samples were encapsulated in agar (2% w/v) and subjected to fixation (1% OsO4), contrasting (1% uranyl acetate), ethanol dehydration, and a two-step infiltration process with propylene oxide/EMbed 812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences) of 16 and 3 hr at room temperature. Additional infiltration was provided under vacuum at room temperature before embedding in BEEM capsules (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and polymerizing at 60° for 72 hr. Semithin (0.5 µm) survey sections were stained with toluidine blue to identify the areas of best cell density. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were prepared and stained with uranyl acetate (1%) and lead citrate (2%). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a Philips CM-120 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV using a MegaView3 camera and iTEM 5.0 software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH). Cell wall thicknesses of 50 sections of different germlings were measured using magnification of 66,000 × and iTEM 5.0 software analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Fungal Cell Walls

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were grown statically from 1x107 conidia at 37°C in MM for 24 h. Mycelia were harvested and immediately fixed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2.5% (v/v) of glutaraldehyde and 2% (w/v) of paraformaldehyde for 24 h at 4°C. Samples were encapsulated in agar (2% w/v) and subjected to fixation (1% OsO4), contrasting (1% uranyl acetate), ethanol dehydration, and a two-step infiltration process with Spurr resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences) of 16 h and 3 h at RT. Additional infiltration was provided under vacuum at RT before embedment in BEEM capsules (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and polymerization at 60°C for 72 h. Semithin (0.5-μm) survey sections were stained with toluidine blue to identify the areas of best cell density. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were prepared and stained again with uranyl acetate (1%) and lead citrate (2%). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a Philips CM-120 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV using a MegaView3 camera and iTEM 5.0 software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH). Cell wall thickness of 100 sections of different germlings were measured at 23,500 x magnification and images analyzed with the ImageJ software [77 (link)]. Statistical differences were evaluated by using test-T.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mouse Retina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole sections of mouse eyes were thoroughly investigated by electron microscopy. Total numbers of eyes investigated by electron microscopy for the different strains were 12 eyes (pigmented Abca4−∕−), 16 eyes (albino Abca4−∕−), 16 eyes (Abca4−∕−.Rdh8−∕−), six eyes (albino WT) and three eyes (pigmented WT). Sections were examined for changes in photoreceptor, RPE and Bruch’s membrane structure. Lipid droplets in RPE cells were counted and their diameter measured in whole sections. Thickness of Bruch’s membrane was measured in 15 consecutive images. All measurements were performed with iTEM 5.0 Software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions, Muenster; Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Fungal Cell Walls

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were grown statically from 1 × 107 conidia at 37°C in MM for 24 h. Mycelia were harvested and immediately fixed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde and 2% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde for 24 h at 4°C. Samples were encapsulated in agar (2%, wt/vol) and subjected to fixation (1% OsO4), contrasting (1% uranyl acetate), ethanol dehydration, and a two-step infiltration process with Spurr resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences) of 16 h and 3 h at RT. Additional infiltration was provided under vacuum at RT before embedment in BEEM capsules (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and polymerization at 60°C for 72 h. Semithin (0.5-μm) survey sections were stained with toluidine blue to identify the areas of best cell density. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were prepared and stained again with uranyl acetate (1%) and lead citrate (2%). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a Philips CM-120 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV using a MegaView3 camera and iTEM 5.0 software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH). Cell wall thicknesses of 100 sections of different germlings were measured at ×23,500 magnification, and images were analyzed with the ImageJ software (85 (link)). Statistical differences were evaluated by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolated extracellular vesicles were immediately fixed in 0.1M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2.5% (v/v) of glutaraldehyde and 2% (w/v) of paraformaldehyde for 2 h at 4°C. Samples were encapsulated in agar (2% w/v) and subjected to fixation (1% OsO4), contrasting (1% uranyl acetate), ethanol dehydration, and a two-step infiltration process with Spurr resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences) of 16 h and 3 h at RT. Additional infiltration was provided under vacuum at RT before embedment in BEEM capsules (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and polymerization at 60°C for 72 h. Semithin (0.5-μm) survey sections were stained with toluidine blue to identify the areas of best cell density. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were prepared and stained again with uranyl acetate (1%) and lead citrate (2%). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a Philips CM-120 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV using a MegaView3 camera and iTEM 5.0 software (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Liver Biopsy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), fresh tissue from liver biopsy of a representative HCC patient was fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 m cacodylate buffer (cb), pH 7.3, for 4 h at room temperature, washed in cb, post‐fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in cb, dehydrated in a graded series of alcohol and embedded in epoxy resin. To define blocks of adequate quality semi‐thin sections were stained with basic fuchsin and methylene blue. Ultrathin sections from selected blocks were mounted on copper grids, double‐stained with uranyl acetate (1%) and lead citrate (0.4%) and examined using a Zeiss TEM 902A (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Digital image acquisition was performed with help of an attached Morada slow‐scan‐CCD camera and the ITEM 5.2 software (both Olympus Soft‐imaging‐Systems, Münster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Analysis of Drosophila NMJs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Third instar larvae were dissected in fresh Ca2+ free HL3 (110 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 10 mM NaHCO3, 5 mM Hepes, 30 mM sucrose, 5 mM trehalose, and 10 mM MgCl2, pH 7.2;87 (link)), nerves were cut and larvae subsequently incubated for 10 min in HL3 with 1.5 mM CaCl2 and 60 mM KCl. Multiple steps of washing with HL3 before fixation removed the non-internalized dye. Larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Laborimpex, 15714) and 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Polysciences, Inc, 111-30-8) in 0.1 M sodium-cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 (Merck, C0250-500g) at 4 °C for at least 24 h. The next day the larvae were osmicated in 2% osmium tetroxide (Laborimpex AGR1023) for 2 h on ice. After staining in 2% aqueous uranyl acetate solution (EMS #22400) for at least 1.5 h and dehydration in an ascending series of ethanol solutions, the samples were embedded in Agar 100 (Laborimpex, AGR1031) and cured at 60 °C for 48 h. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were cut with a Dumont Diamond Knife on a Leica UCT ultra-microtome and collected on copper grids (Van Loenen, 01805-F) and imaged on a JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL) at 80 kV with a bottom mounted camera (Quemasa; 11 megapixels; Olympus) running iTEM 5.2 software (Olympus). Statistical analyses were performed on larvae from 3 independent crosses per genotype. More than 5 NMJs per larvae were imaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrastructural Analysis of Adult Fly Retina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult fly heads were dissected and immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Na-Cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature. Samples were further fixed at 4 °C overnight, and then washed with 0.1 M Na-Cacodylate, pH 7.4, and subsequently osmicated with 2% osmium (OsO4/Na-Cacodylate buffer). After dehydration in an ascending series of ethanol solutions and staining in 4% aqueous uranyl acetate solution the specimen were embedded in Agar 100 (Laborimpex; Agar Scientific). Ultrathin sections (70 nm) of the retina and the lamina were collected on grids (Laborimpex; Agar Scientific) coated with Butvar and imaged on a JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL) at 80 kV with a bottom mounted camera (Quemasa; 11 megapixels; Olympus) running iTEM 5.2 software (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!