The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fusion pulse

Manufactured by Vilber
Sourced in France

Fusion Pulse is a laboratory equipment designed for the visualization and analysis of nucleic acid samples. It utilizes pulsed-field gel electrophoresis technology to separate DNA or RNA fragments based on their size and molecular weight.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using fusion pulse

1

Protein Extraction and Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown to mid-log-phase with or without the following reagents: Bortezomib (BZ; A2S Cat # 2614), cycloheximide (CHX, Sigma, Cat # C6255) or cadmium (Cd; Sigma Cat # 265365). Cells were pelleted by centrifugation (3,500 × g, 5 min) and incubated with 0.1 N NaOH for 5 min, followed by centrifugation (17,000 × g, 3 min). SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing 50 mg/ml Dithiothreitol was next added, followed by boiling for 5 min. Proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE, transferred to a PVDF membrane, blocked in 10% Dry Milk in TBS + 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T), and then probed with primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Following three washes with TBS-T, the membrane was incubated with a secondary antibody for 0.5 h at room temperature, then washed three times with TBS-T. Membranes were incubated with ECL mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 min and reactive bands were visualized using Fusion Pulse (Vilber Lourmat).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless stated otherwise, 30 μg of the different lysates were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad; catalog no.: 1620174) and blocked in blocking buffer, composed of Tris-buffered saline (TBS)  (10 mM Tris–HCl [pH 7.5] and 150 mM NaCl) with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) supplemented with 3% dry milk. Blots were then probed with primary antibodies diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C. Following three washes with TBS-T, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibody diluted 1:10,000 in blocking buffer for 1.5 h at room temperature and then washed three times with TBS-T. Membranes were incubated with ECL mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 min, and reactive bands were visualized using Fusion Pulse (Vilber Lourmat). Antibodies used in this study are listed later (Table 3).

Antibody list used in this study

AntibodyManufacturer
α-ERKCell Signaling Technology; catalog no.: 4695
α-p(TEY) ERKCell Signaling Technology; catalog no.: 4370
α-p(T207/188) ERKKinexus; catalog no.: pk865
α-HisSigma; catalog no.: H1029
α-HARoche; catalog no.: 11867423001
α-Mpk1Santa Cruz Biotechnology; catalog no.: SC6803
α-Hog1Santa Cruz Biotechnology; catalog no.: SC9079
α-p-p38Cell Signaling Technology; catalog no.: 9211
α-GAPDHThermo Fisher Scientific; catalog no.: MA515738
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hog1 Phosphorylation Dynamics Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen mycelia from C. heterostrophus strains were ground in liquid nitrogen, and their proteins were extracted using SDS buffer containing 5% SDS, 100 mM Tris pH 8, and 10 mM DTT, heated for 5 min at 95 °C and sonicated (30 s, level 5, Microson XL-Misonic, Farmingdale, NY, USA). The extract was then centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min, room temperature), and the supernatant was subjected to acetone precipitation. The resolved protein pellet was solubilized using a urea buffer containing 8 M urea, 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 10 mM DTT. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay, and 25 µg from each extract was loaded onto a 10% SDS-PAGE. The transfer was performed using the e-blot protein transfer kit (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The blots were exposed to either p-P38 antibody (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA, T180-Y182, 9211S) or Hog1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA, y-215, sc-9079) in order to examine the changes in the Hog1 phosphorylation levels or the total Hog1 levels, respectively, upon exposure to different treatments (sorbitol or FA). A luminescence detection by ECL was performed in a Fusion Pulse (VILBER Lourmat, Collégien, France) imager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CcpA Binding to sak Promoter Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biotin-labeled DNA probes possessing the predicted promoter region of sak (190-bp and 464-bp) were amplified from S. aureus strain XN108 gDNA with 5′-biotin-labeled primers (Table S3). The obtained probes were incubated with various amounts of purified His-tagged recombinant protein CcpA in EMSA/Gel-Shift-binding buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 20 min of incubation at 25 °C, the mixtures were separated in a 6% native polyacrylamide gel at 100 V, and transferred to a nylon membrane at 380 mA for 30 min in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer. Followed by cross-linking at 120 mJ/cm2 for 60 sec using a UV-light cross-linker instrument (SCIENTZ, Ningbo, China), the biotin-labeled DNA fragments were detected using the Chemiluminescent Nucleic Acid Detection Module Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s suggestions, and imaged with Fusion Pulse (VILBER, Collegien, France). The unlabeled probes were added in 200-fold excess as specific competitors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chemokine Profiling of Monocyte Secretome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monocytes from two healthy donors and two patients were cultured as described for 8 h. The collected media samples were centrifuged twice at 600 g for 4 min at 4°C to achieve cell-free media. Chemokines in the media were detected by a chemokine antibody array (RayBio AAH-CHE-1–4). Images were obtained using Fusion Pulse (Vilber) using the serial option to obtain images every 2 s. Raw numerical densitometry was obtained for multiple images of each experiment using Protein Array Analyzer for ImageJ (Carpentier G. available online: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/macros/toolsets/ProteinArrayAnalyzer.txt). Data from the best signal image of each protein were used: before signal saturation on either the treatment or the control array, and before saturation of any positive control. Background signal substruction and standardization were performed in Microsoft Excel, yielding a fold change ratio of normalized Wnt signal to raw control signal, as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!