The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Negative immunomagnetic cell sorting

Manufactured by Miltenyi Biotec

Negative immunomagnetic cell sorting is a laboratory technique used to isolate specific cell populations from a heterogeneous sample. The core function of this method is to magnetically label unwanted cells, which are then retained by a magnetic field, allowing the desired cells to be collected.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using negative immunomagnetic cell sorting

1

Intravital Imaging of T Cell-DC Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell preparation and adoptive transfer were performed as previously described23 (link). Briefly, splenic DCs were purified from B10.A CD45.2 mice using CD11c microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Polyclonal CD4+ T cells from LNs of B10.A CD45.2 and TCR transgenic 5C.C7 CD4+ T cells from WT or IL2−/− B10.A CD45.2+ 5C.C7 TCR-transgenic RAG2−/− mice were purified by negative immunomagnetic cell sorting (Miltenyi Biotec). DCs were incubated in vitro with PCC peptide (10 μM pPCC, American Peptide Company) and LPS (1.0 μg/ml, Invivogen) for 4 hours at 37°C before s.c. injection at 1 × 106/footpad. CD4+ T cells were transferred by i.v. injection at 2 × 106/recipient 18 hours post-transfer of DCs.
For 2P intravital imaging, DCs were stained with 100 μM CTB (7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin, Molecular Probes), polyclonal CD4+ T cells were stained with 1.25 μM CMFDA (5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate, Molecular Probes), and WT or IL2−/− TCR transgenic 5C.C7 CD4+ T cells were stained with 1.25 μM CMTPX (Molecular Probes). 24 hours after T cell transfer, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and popliteal LNs were surgically exposed. Imaging was performed on a Zeiss 710 microscope equipped with a Chameleon laser (Coherent) tuned to 800 nm in combination with a 20× water-dipping lens (NA 1.0, Zeiss) using Zen 2010 acquisition software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying T Cell Migration to LNs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphocyte migration was assayed by whole-mount microscopy as described previously (Kanemitsu et al., 2005 (link)). Briefly, WT and Lpar2-/- CD4+ T cells (L-selectin+ CD44- naïve T cells in CD4+ T cells of WT and Lpar2-/- mice were 79.7 ± 10.7% and 78.7 ± 9.1%, respectively) were isolated by negative immunomagnetic cell sorting (Miltenyi Biotec) and labeled with 5 μM DiD and 5 μM CMTMR (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. The cells were mixed in equal numbers (1 x 107 cells) and injected intravenously into WT mice; after 1.5 hr, MECA-79 mAb was injected to label the luminal HEV surface, and inguinal LNs were isolated. The LNs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer and incubated with sucrose (30%). Immunofluorescence signals were observed with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (FV1000-D, Olympus, Japan). The distance between T cells and the nearest HEV was measured using Imaris software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!