The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using acquity uplc hss t3 1.8 μm

1

Multi-Mycotoxin Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents of analytical grade were mainly used, with the exception of mobile-phase reagents, which comprised solvents of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade. Analytical standards of MPA and NIV were purchased from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA); of PA, from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA); and of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2, AFM1, BEA, CIT, DON, ENNA, ENNB, FB1, FB2, HT-2, T-2 toxins, MON, OTA, PAT, TEA, TTX, and ZEA from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Ultrapure H2O was supplied through a Milli-Q water system from Merck (Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) and C18 sorbent from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Acetonitrile (ACN) was acquired from Carlo Erba (Val de Reuil, France), anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and sodium chloride (NaCl) from Honeywell (Seelze, Germany), and formic acid from Chem-Lab (Zedelgem, Belgium). ACQUITY UPLC® HSS T3 1.8 μm (2.1 × 100 mm i.d.) was obtained from Waters (Milford, MA, USA); HPLC vials and Syringeless Device Mini UniPrep filters (0.45 µm PVDF, polypropylene), from Whatman (Maidstone, England).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UPLC-MS/MS analysis was carried out by means of the analytical method previously described by Carretero et al. [27 (link)]. The chromatographic system used consisted of a Waters Acquity UPLC-Xevo TQD system (Milford, MA, USA), and the analytical column was an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm (2.1 × 100 mm) also from Waters. Briefly, mobile phases A and B consisted of deionized water and ACN, respectively, both with 0.1% of formic acid. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min, and the run time was 7 min. Analytes were determined by electrospray ionization (ESI) using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive mode. More instrumental parameters are described by Carretero et al. [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Plasma Glutamine Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected 5 ml of venous blood within 24 h of admission from both groups, the samples were mixed in EDTA anticoagulation tubes, and 1 ml of plasma was separated and preserved at −80°C in an ultra-low temperature refrigerator. The plasma PAGln level was measured through liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The plasma samples (100 μL) were vortexed with methanol (400 μL), sonicated and centrifuged (12,000 rpm, 4°C, 10 min). The supernatant was subsequently removed and analyzed on the machine. Next, chromatographic separation was performed on a column Acquity UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm (Waters, Milford, USA) with the following conditions: flow rate, 0.30 ml/min; column temperature, 40°C; injection volume, 5 μl; mobile phase composition, A, water (0.1% formic acid) and B, methanol; and sample gradient elution program, 0–1.0 min 10% B. The PAGln was detected using an AB Sciex Triple Quad 5,500 mass spectrometer(AB SCIEX, Framingham, USA) with the setting thermoelectric spray ion source mode. The data were collected using the multiple reaction monitoring mode with the parameters 263.2 Da for Q1 Mass and 145.2 Da for Q3 Mass. The declustering potential was −29 V, and the collision energy was −15 V. The MultiQuant software was used for the integration, and the PAGln content was calculated using the standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gibberellin Quantification in Fruits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gibberellins levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (AB SCIEX TripleTOF 5600+, Darmstadt, IN, USA). Approximately 0.5 g of fruits was ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted using solvent A (1 L 80% methanol containing 0.5 g citric acid and 0.2 g butylated hydroxytoluene). The sample was extracted with 4 ml of solvent A, and the extract was shaken at 4°C for 12 h. After centrifuging the sample at 10,000 ×g and 4°C for 15 min, the supernatant was collected. Next, 2 ml of solvent A was added to the sample, which was shaken again at 4°C for 1 h. The sample was centrifuged at 10,000 ×g at 4°C for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected. This step was repeated. All supernatant aliquots were mixed and dried under nitrogen gas, dissolved in 250 µl methanol and passed through a 0.22-µm filter membrane. The high-performance liquid chromatography analysis was performed using an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 (1.8 μm, Waters, USA) column (2.1 × 100 mm). The mobile phase solvent was the same as in Balcke et al. (2012) (link), and the injection volume was 2 µl. The mass spectrometry conditions were as follows: a spray voltage of 4,500 V, and air curtain, nebulizer, and auxiliary gas pressures of 15, 65, and 70 psi, respectively. The atomizing temperature was 400°C. Each sample consisted of three replicates from independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High performance liquid chromatography, Model: ExionLC Brand: AB SCIEX, High resolution mass spectrometry, Model: SCIEX Triple TOF 5600 + Brand: AB SCIEX, Chromatographic column, Model: ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm(2.1 × 100 mm), Brand: Waters, Centrifuge, Model: Legend Micro 17R Brand: Thermo, vertical pressure steam sterilizer, model: LC-50LD, Brand: Binjiang Medical clean platform, Model:SW-CJ-2FD, Brand: BoXun. Constant temperature culture oscillator, Model: ZWY-100D, Brand: ZHICHENG. Electronic balance, Model: AL104, Brand: METTLER TOLEDO. Electric blast drying oven, Model:101-1AB, Brand: TAISITE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Plant Hormone Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant hormone (ABA, IAA, GA1, GA4, tZ, and tZR) levels were measured according to Kojima et al. (2009) (link) with minor modifications. Fresh powder samples (0.2 g) was homogenized in 5 mL pre-chilled acetonitrile for 12 h. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 5 mL pre-chilled acetonitrile for 2 h and then collected and combined with the supernatant after centrifugation as before. Next, 20 mg C18 powder and 0.5 g anhydrous magnesium sulfate powder was added to the combined supernatant, and the supernatant was collected after centrifugation as before. The supernatant was concentrated to near dryness using a centrifuge concentrator for 6–8 h and added with 0.2 mL methanol. The sample was filtered through a 0.22 μm organic nylon membrane and filled with a 2 mL sample bottle. The levels of plant hormones were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS; QTRAP® 6500, AB Sciex, USA) fitted with a chromatographic column (ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3, 1.8 μm, 2.1 × 75 mm, Waters). Hormones were separated at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min-1 with the gradients of solvent A (0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (acetonitrile) set as follows: 0 min, 95% A + 5% B; 1 min, 95% A + 5% B; 8 min, 5% A + 95% B; 8.1 min, 95% A + 5% B; and 10 min, 95% A + 5% B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analytical Standards for Mycotoxin Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents of analytical grade were mainly used, with the exception of mobile phase reagents which were of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade. Analytical standards comprised: MPA and NIV from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA); PA from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA); AFB1, B2, G1, G2, and M1, BEA, CIT, DON, ENNA, and B, FB1 and B2, HT-2 and T-2 toxins, MON, OTA, PAT, TEA, TTX, and ZEA from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Ultrapure H2O was supplied from Millipore System (Paris, France), C18 sorbent from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA), acetonitrile (ACN) from Carlo Erba (Val de Reuil Cedex, France), anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and sodium chloride (NaCl) from Honeywell (Seelze, Germany), and formic acid from Chem-Lab (Zedelgem, Belgium). ACQUITY UPLC® HSS T3 1.8 μm (2.1 × 100 mm i.d.) was purchased from Waters (Milford, MA, USA), and HPLC vials and Syringeless Device Mini UniPrep filters (0.45 μm PVDF, polypropylene) from Whatman (Maidstone, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of L-kynurenine in DC Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DCs were isolated by FACS sorting and 80 × 103 DCs were cultured at 0.5 × 106 cells/mL for 24 h in complete X‐VIVO medium and indicated stimuli. Conditioned media were analyzed for l‐kynurenine by HPLC. Samples were pretreated with perchloric acid to precipitate proteins. Samples were pretreated (5:1) with 20% formic acid. 200 μL of samples was mixed with 200 μL buffer (0.77 g/L NH4Ac, 100 mg/L EDTA‐Na2, 375 mg/L NaCl, 37.5 mL/L MeOH; pH 5.35). Pure kynurenine (Sigma‐Aldrich) was used for calibration. Samples were injected into an Acquity Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) system (Waters, Milford, MA), consisting of an autosampler, injector, column (Acquity UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm; 2.1 × 100 mm) and UV detector (Waters) at 360 nm. Chromatographic separation was performed at an elution rate of 0.3 mL/min buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SCFA Quantification in Tissues and Feces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCFA concentrations were analyzed at LSI Medience Corporation (Tokyo, Japan), which is a contract laboratory. Briefly, approximately 150 mg of tissue or feces was transferred to a disruptor tube supplied by Yasui Kikai (Osaka, Japan) and shaken with an iron cone cooled in liquid nitrogen. The powders were suspended with 1 mL of water, and 50 μL of the suspension was transferred to a micro tube (when a specimen was serum, 50 μL of serum was transferred into a micro tube). After mixing with 200 μL of methanol using a shaker for 15 min, the samples were centrifuged at 20,000g for 1 min at 4°C. A volume of 200 μL of the supernatant was mixed with 2‐nitrophenylhidrazine and 1‐3‐dimethylaminopropyl‐carbodiimide solution and analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (Nexera X2 LC‐30 AD, 8050; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a reverse‐phase LC column (ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3,1.8 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm; Waters, USA). The data were analyzed using the LabSolutions software (Shimadzu). The peak areas were normalized by internal standards, and the concentration of each SCFA was obtained using a standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Remdesivir and GS-441524 Pharmacokinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For remdesivir and GS-441524 PK assessments at steady state, blood samples were collected on day 4, immediately after (C0) and at 1 h (C1) and 24 h (C24) after IV remdesivir administration.18 (link)Plasma samples were obtained by centrifugation (5000 rpm for 5 min at +4°C) of blood samples (tubes containing lithium heparin). Immediately after collection, 1 mL of plasma was isolated and stored at –20°C until measurement of remdesivir and GS-441524 concentrations. Plasma concentrations of remdesivir and its metabolite GS-441524 were determined by using validated UHPLC-MS/MS.19 (link) Briefly, 50 μL of sample was mixed with 600 μL of acetonitrile:methanol (50:50, v:v) containing internal standard (quinaxoline). Three hundred microlitres of supernatant was diluted with 600 μL of HPLC-MS grade water and 10 μL was injected into the column Acquity UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm (2.1 × 50 mm Waters). Remdesivir and GS-441524 were measured simultaneously with a limit of quantification of 5.86 and 1.96 ng/mL, respectively. Linearity was 5.86 to 3000 ng/mL for remdesivir and 1.96 to 1000 ng/mL for GS-441524, with R2 >0.995 for both drugs. In order to decrease esterase plasma activity, all steps were performed on ice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!