The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti sumo 1

1

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fourty adult animals were transferred to an Eppendorf tube containing 20 μl of water. 20 μl of 2xSDS buffer were added, and the sample was incubated for 5 min at 95°C. Genomic DNA was digested by adding 1 μl of DNase (Qiagen) and incubating for 5 min at room temperature, followed by a 5 min inactivation at 95°C. Proteins were separated by SDS PAGE on 4–12% acrylamide gradient gels and blotted onto PVDF membranes. After blocking non-specific binding sites with 5% milk or bovine serum albumin in TBST (20 mM Tris, 150mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20), the membranes were incubated with the primary antibody diluted in TBST containing 5% milk overnight at 4°C. After incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, the protein bands were viualized by chemiluminescence using the SuperSignal West Pico or Dura Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scintific). Quantification was performed by measuring the band intensities using Fiji’s measurement tools [56 (link)]. Band intensities were first normalized to the alpha-tubulin loading controls and then to the maximum value in each experiment. The following antibodies were used: anti-SUMO-1 1:500 (S5446 Sigma), anti-Flag 1:3000 (Sigma F3165-1MG), anti-Tubulin 1:10 000 (Abcam ab18251), HRPGoat anti-Rabbit 1:2000 (Jackson ImmunoReserach 111-035-144) and HRP Goat anti-Mouse 1:2000 (Jackson ImmunoReserach 115-035-146).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of AAV Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 1.42 × 1010 vgs of AAV vectors were loaded onto a denaturing SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) gel. Resolved proteins were further transferred into polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY). Subsequently, the membrane was blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. Membranes were then probed with anti-AAV (B1) (1:500; Fitzgerald, North Acton, MA) or anti-SUMO-1 (1:1,000; Sigma–Aldrich) primary antibodies and detected with an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2,500; Abcam, Milton, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The signals were developed by chemiluminescent substrate (SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS; Thermo Scientific). Densitometric quantification was performed by using ImageJ35 (link) in three different blots with two measurements at least for each blot developed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of AAV Capsid Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 1.42 × 1010 vgs of AAV vectors were loaded onto a denaturing SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) gel. Resolved proteins were further transferred into polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY). Subsequently, the membrane was blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. Membranes were then probed with anti-AAV (B1) (1:500; Fitzgerald, North Acton, MA) or anti-SUMO-1 (1:1,000; Sigma–Aldrich) primary antibodies and detected with an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2,500; Abcam, Milton, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The signals were developed by chemiluminescent substrate (SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS; Thermo Scientific). Densitometric quantification was performed by using ImageJ35 (link) in three different blots with two measurements at least for each blot developed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blotting for SUMO and Autophagy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche, Boulogne-Billancourt, France) and 5 mM N-ethylmaleimide (Sigma). Proteins were separated on SDS/PAGE gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Velizy-Villacoublay, France), blocked with 5% non-fat milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20. Membranes were then probed overnight at 4°C with the relevant primary antibodies: anti-SUMO1 (Sigma), anti-SUMO2/3 (Sigma), anti-LC3 (Sigma), anti-SAE1 (Abcam, Paris, France), anti-SAE2 (Abcam), anti-UBC9 (Abcam), anti-PIAS3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Saint Quentin Yvelines, France), anti-p62 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology). After washes, membranes were incubated with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology), and blots were detected using the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Charfent, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Immunoblotting Analysis of SUMOylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer plus protease inhibitors (leupeptin 1 μg/mL, aprotinin 1 μg/mL, PMSF 100 μg/mL and EDTA 1 mM) and 0.5 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). Equal amount of total proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies: anti-UBC9 (Abcam), anti-SUMO1 (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-SUMO2/3 (Abcam), anti-RanGAP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p53 (DO-1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-pRb (Santa Cruz Biotechology), anti-SAE1 (Abcam), anti-SAE2 (Abcam), anti-Ubiquitylated proteins (FK1, Biomol), anti-LC3 (Novus Biologicals), anti-p62 (2C11, Abnova), anti-EGFR (kindly provided by S. Sigismund, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, IFOM, Milan [86 (link)]), anti-ATG5 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pRb (BD Pharmingen). Anti-GAPDH (Abcam), anti-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich), or anti-vinculin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies were used as loading control. Membranes were then incubated with the appropriate IR Dye-conjugated or horseradish peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibodies (Licor), and scanned with a LI-COR Odyssey Imager or acquired with Chemidoc (Bio-rad), respectively. The intensities of the protein bands were quantified using ImageJ software (Rasband W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health), and standardized to the housekeeper levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!