The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using p 2000 laser puller

1

Scanning Ion-Conductance Microscopy of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were scanned using a scanning ion-conductance microscope (ICAPPIC Ltd., London, UK). Scanning was performed in a hopping mode with a fall rate of 100 nm/ms at a bias potential of 200 mV using nanopipettes as probes. Nanopipettes with a characteristic inner tip radius of about 25–50 nm were obtained using a laser puller P-2000 (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA). The ion current was measured using a MultiClamp 700 B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Wokingham, UK). The stress that the nanopipette induces on a cell was calculated from the gap size in terms of the ion current decrease at two different set points 0.5% and 2%. The resulting images and calculations were processed using SICMImageViewer software (ICAPPIC Ltd., UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy of Cardiomyocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a SICM device (XE-Bio; Park Systems, Suwon, Korea) consisted of a glass nanopipette, an X–Y scanner, a Z-axis piezo driver, a current amplifier, a feedback controller, an inverted microscope, and a data acquisition system. Isolated cardiomyocytes were placed in a 35-mm culture dish containing Ca2+-free storage solution, and SICM imaging was conducted at room temperature (~25°C). Imaging of the cell surface was operated under the ARS-mode (Park Systems) or hopping-mode of SICM [19 (link),20 (link)]. The probing nanopipette was fabricated with 1.0 mm outer diameter and 0.58 mm inner diameter borosilicate glass tubing (Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT, USA) using a laser puller P-2000 (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, USA). In all experiments, measured nanopipette resistance was ~150 MΩ when it was filled with a Ca2+-free cell storage solution. The scan size was measured differently for each cell with a randomly selected area. The scanning pixel was 128 (X-axis) by 128 (Y-axis). The cells were imaged with the XEP software program (ver. 1.7.94 build 9; Parks Systems), and the acquired topographic images were analyzed with the XEI analysis program (ver. 1.8.0 build 20; Park Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transfection and Electrophysiological Recordings of HEK 293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK 293T cells were co-transfected with 2 μg of each subunit plasmid and 1 μg of the pHook-1 cDNA (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using a modified calcium phosphate precipitation method and selected 24 hours after transfection by magnetic hapten coated beads39 (link). For each recording, the external bathing solution consisted of (in mM) NaCl 142, KCl 8, MgCl2 6, CaCl2 1, HEPES 10, glucose 10, pH 7.4 and 325–330 mOsm. The pipette solution consisted of (in mM) KCl 153, MgCl2 1 MgATP 2, HEPES 10, EGTA 5, pH 7.3 and 310–320 mOsm. Recording pipettes were made of thin-walled borosilicate glass (World Precision Instruments, Pittsburgh, PA) pulled with a P-2000 laser puller (Sutter Instruments, San Rafael, CA) and fire polished with a microforge (Narishige, East Meadow, NY) to resistances between 1.2–1.8 MΩ when filled with internal solution. Lifted whole cells were voltage clamped at −50 mV37 (link)40 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Viral Labeling of Mouse Hippocampus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three-month old male mice (C57BL/6J; Jackson Laboratories) were anesthetized with isoflurane (2–5%) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Digital Just for Mice Stereotaxic Instrument), and buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously for analgesia. The head was fixed, and the skull was exposed. Burr holes were made and a glass micropipet (Drummond Scientific) slowly lowered into the dorsal hippocampus at −2.0 mm anteroposterior, ±1.8 mm mediolateral, and −1.8 mm dorsoventral relative to bregma. Pipets were formed with 20 μm diameter tips using a P-2000 laser puller (Sutter Instrument). AAV8-CAMKII-Synapto-physin-mCherry virus (300 nL) was pressure-injected into each hemisphere. After injection, the pipet remained in place for 10 min and was then slowly retracted. The mice were placed on a heating pad (TR-200; Fine Science Tools) throughout the duration of the surgery. After injection, the scalp was sutured, and saline and analgesic meloxicam (4mg/kg) were administered subcutaneously. The mice were placed under heating lamps during recovery from anesthesia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ECD Mass Spectrometry of Protein Ions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ECD experiments were carried out on a Solarix 7 T FT-ICR mass spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA) equipped with an Infinity cell and a nanoESI source operated in the positive ion mode. NanoESI emitters were pulled from quartz capillaries (O.D. = 1.0 mm and I.D. = 0.70 mm) with the use of a Sutter Instruments Co. P2000 laser puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). Sample aliquots (10 μL of 5 μM solution) were loaded in a pulled-tip capillary, housed in a mounted custom built XYZ stage in front of the MS inlet, and voltages were applied via a tungsten wire inserted inside the nESI emitters. The nESI high voltage, capillary exit, and skimmers I and II were set to 1300 V, 200 V, 30 V and 4 V, respectively. Precursor ions were isolated in the instrument quadrupole with a mass window of 5 Da, accumulated for 0.5 s in the collision cell, and further injected into the ICR cell. ECD experiments were performed on the mass-selected [M+3H]3+ ions with a heated hollow cathode operating at a current of 1.5 A. Electrons emitted during 0.2 s were injected into the ICR cell with a 2.2 V bias and 10 V ECD lens. A total of 150 scans (m/z range 100–2000) were co-added with a data acquisition size of 512 K words.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Proteomics of C. acnes Secreted Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins in the secreted and sheared fractions were identified with MS. Nano-electrospray ionization MS/MS (nanoESI-MS/MS) analyses were performed on an EASY-nLC II system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to a TripleTOF 5600+ mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX) operated under Analyst TF 1.6.1 control. The trypsin-digested samples were suspended in 0.1% formic acid, injected, trapped and desalted on a precolumn. The peptides were eluted and separated on a 15 cm analytical column (75 μm i.d.), pulled in-house (P2000 laser puller, Sutter Instrument). Trap and analytical column were packed with ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ 3 μm resin (Dr. Maisch GmbH). Peptides were eluted from the analytical column at a flow rate of 250 nl/min using a 30 min gradient from 5 to 35% of solution B (0.1% formic acid, 100% acetonitrile). The collected MS files were converted to Mascot generic format (MGF) using the AB SCIEX MS Data Converter beta 1.1 (AB SCIEX) and the “protein pilot MGF” parameters. The generated peak lists were searched using an in-house Mascot search engine (Matrix Science) against all C. acnes proteins in the UniProt database as well as against all tad plasmid-encoded proteins (the plasmid p09-9 was used). Search parameters were allowing one missed trypsin cleavage site and propionamide as a fixed modification with peptide tolerance and MS/MS tolerance set to 10 ppm and 0.2 Da, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoscale Electrochemical Probes for Surface Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SECCM probes were single-barrelled nanopipettes with approximately 400 nm aperture radius. The nanopipettes were fabricated from single-barrelled borosilicate capillaries (1.5 mm O.D and 0.86 mm I.D., BF150-86-7.5, Sutter Instrument, USA) using a P-2000 laser puller (Sutter Instrument, USA). Using a pipette filler (MicroFil MF34G-5, World Precision Instruments, USA) the nanopipette was filled with 20 mM HClO4 electrolyte. A Pd-H2 quasi reference counter electrode (QRCE) was inserted at the top end of the pipette; prior to this, a Palladium wire (0.25 mm diameter, 5 cm long, PD005130, Goodfellow, UK) was biased at −3 V vs. a Pt counter electrode in 20 mM HClO4 solution for 15 min to yield the Pd–H2 quasi reference electrode50 (link),51 (link). Pd–H2 QRCE was calibrated against the standard calomel electrode (SCE) after the SECCM scan with a value of −191 mV, which corresponds to a potential of +50 mV vs Standard Hydrogen Electrode (SHE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fabrication of Carbon Nanoelectrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The carbon nanoelectrodes were fabricated according to the methods used for fabricating nanoscale tweezers (Supplementary Fig. 3). Briefly, the double-barrel theta quartz capillaries were first pulled by a two-line programme using a P-2000 laser puller (Sutter Instrument). Next, butane was passed through the pulled nanopipettes and heated, under an argon atmosphere to pyrolytically deposit carbon inside the pipette. After carbon deposition, the carbon nanoelectrodes consisted of two coplanar semi-elliptical electrodes encapsulated in quartz, which were separated by a quartz septum. All of the nanoelectrodes were fabricated immediately before experiments, unless noted otherwise, and stored in a sealed Petri dish until used, to minimise any contamination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fabrication of Nanopipette Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanopipettes were fabricated as previously published by our laboratory.16 (link),19 (link) Briefly, double barrel quartz theta (o.d., 1.2 mm, i.d., 0.9 mm, Intracell) capillaries were pulled with a P-2000 laser puller (Sutter Instrument) using the following parameters for approximately 30 nm apparent radius nanoelectrodes: heat 790, filament 3, velocity 45, delay 130, and pull 90. As described previously,14 ,15 (link),18 (link) the nanopipettes were filled with propane/butane and heated under inert atmosphere in a butane flame to decompose the carbon gas and yield pyrolytic carbon inside the nanopipettes. The entire fabrication process takes about 1 min per electrode. The size and quality of nanoelectrodes was assessed from the steady-state current during a CV in 1 mM ferrocenemethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1 M KCl (Supplementary Figure 1). Only electrodes exhibiting a steady-state current smaller than 30 pA were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fabrication of Quartz Nanopipettes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanopipettes were fabricated using a P-2000 laser puller (Sutter Instrument Co,USA) from quartz capillaries with an outer diameter of 1 mm and an inner diameter of 0.50 mm (QF100-50-7.5; Sutter Instrument Co,USA).
Nanopipettes were fabricated using a two-lines protocol: 1) HEAT: 575; FIL: 3; VEL: 35; DEL: 145; PUL: 75, followed by 2) HEAT: 900; FIL: 2; VEL: 15; DEL: 128; PUL: 200. It should be noted that the pulling program is instrument specific and there is variation between P-2000 pullers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!