The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sp5 confocal system

Manufactured by Leica camera
Sourced in France

The Leica SP5 confocal system is a high-performance microscope designed for advanced imaging applications. It features a multi-channel detection system, enabling simultaneous acquisition of multiple fluorescent signals. The system provides high-resolution, 3D imaging capabilities, allowing users to visualize and analyze complex biological samples with precision.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

51 protocols using sp5 confocal system

1

Confocal Microscopy of Au@DTDTPA-Cy5 in U87 MG Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal microscopy experiments were performed with a LEICA SP5 confocal system located at the Centre de Photonique Bio-Medical (CPBM), University Paris-Sud (Orsay, France) in a controlled chamber. The samples were kept at 37 °C and regulated in CO2. The U87 MG cells were incubated with 0.5 mM of Au@DTDTPA-Cy5 for 6 h. Cyanine 5 was excited at 633 nm and the fluorescence emission was detected in the 650–750 nm range. The images were processed with the freely available ImageJ software.
For colocalization studies, the U87 MG cells were incubated for 12 h with 200 nM MitoTracker Green (Invitrogen – Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). The trackers were washed out with PBS 1× before incubation for 6 h with 1 mM of Au@DTDTPA-Cy5. Organic dye was excited at 633 nm and the fluorescence emission was detected in the 650–750 nm range. The MitoTracker Green was excited at 488 nm and the fluorescence emission was detected in the 505–600 nm range. Images were recorded at three different depths (z-axis positions).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescence Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization experiments, images were obtained using a Nikon epifluorescence microscope, a Leica DMI600B fluorescence microscope or a Leica SP5 confocal system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining of Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining of tissue sections was done using a primary Rabbit Anti-Firefly Luciferase antibody (Abcam product # ab21176) and a Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG secondary conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (Abcam product # ab150076). 15-micron sections of the tissue were placed on slides and kept at −80 °C. The slides were then washed using TBS plus 0.05% Triton X-100 buffer. Samples were blocked in 10% goat serum with 1% BSA. Primary antibody (12 hours at 4 °C) was used per manufacture’s recommended dilution. After washing, the secondary antibody was added at the manufacture’s recommended concentration for 1 hour at room temperature. Fluorescent imaging was done using a Leica SP5 confocal system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of Drosophila Intestines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intact fly intestines were dissected and fixed as described previously (Meng and Biteau, 2015 (link)). The Sox100B antibody was kindly provided by Steve Russell (1:1,000 dilution), and Pdm1 antibody was kindly provided by Xiaohang Yang and Cai Yu (1:1,000 dilution). Sox21a antibody was generated in the lab (1:5,000 dilution). The anti-Delta (C594.9B; 1:100 dilution), anti-Armadillo (N2 7A1; 1:100 dilution), anti-Prospero (MR1A; 1:250 dilution), anti-β-galactosidase (40-1a; 1:100 dilution) were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank and the Anti-phospho-Histone H3 (06-570; 1:2,000 dilution) from Millipore. Fluorescent secondary antibodies were obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch. Hoechst 33258 was used to stain DNA.
Confocal images were collected using a Leica SP5 confocal system and processed using the Leica software, Fiji, and Adobe Photoshop CC.
For all quantifications of cell numbers, cell proportion or signal intensity, the data are represented as average ± SEM and p values are calculated using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t test unless stated otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Neuromuscular Synapse Morphometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were fixed and subjected to antibody labeling as described4 (link). Fixed animals were treated with anti-myotactin antibodies (MH46, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at 1:50 dilution in B-PBST (PBS + 0.1% Triton-X100 + 3% BSA), incubated overnight at 4°C, and washed several times in B-PBST. Next, samples were treated with an anti-mouse secondary antibody (Alexa567-tagged, 1:2000, LifeTechnologies) overnight, washed in B-PBST, and mounted in VectorShield, cured for several hours (4°C), and imaged in a Leica SP5 confocal system. Interpunctum interval (IPI) was determined from intensity profiles, as described60 (link). The binsize for IPI histograms was calculated according to Freedman-Diaconis rule: width=3.49N0.3, where N is the number of observations. Histograms were normalized to yield a probability density function, which were fit by a Gamma-distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescent Analysis of OGT and RL2 in Mouse Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were fasted for 6 hours before sacrifice. Tissue samples were dissected, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours, and embedded in paraffin blocks. H&E stains were performed by the Histology Core in the Department of Comparative Medicine. For immunofluorescent staining, mice were anesthetized for intracardial perfusion of PBS, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde with 0.08% glutaraldehyde. Brain and adipose depots were dissected and postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. Coronal brain sections (50 μm) were prepared using a vibratome. Tissue sections were blocked with 3% BSA and 0.2% Triton X-100 in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were incubated with primary antibodies (1:100 dilution; CST, anti-OGT, 24083; Abcam, anti-RL2, ab2739) overnight and secondary antibodies [1:400; Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG), Alexa Fluor 594 anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa Fluor 594 anti-mouse IgG, and Alexa Fluor 647 anti-rabbit IgG] for 1 hour. Immunofluorescent staining and clearance of tissues were performed following previous literature (72 ). The slides were mounted with VECTASHIELD antifade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and saved at 4°C until imaging. A Keyence digital microscope and the Leica SP5 confocal system were used for H&E stain imaging and fluorescent imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Imaging of Neuronal Dendrites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Larvae immunostaining was described previously (Ye et al., 2011 (link)). Confocal imaging was done with a Leica SP5 confocal system with 20x or 63x glycerol immersion lenses. To minimize the variation, we only imaged neuronal dendrites and presynaptic terminals of C3 da or C4 da neurons in abdominal segments 4, 5, and 6. Images were collected with z stacks of 1-μm-step size for dendrites and 0.3-μm-step size for axons. The resulting three-dimensional images were projected into two-dimensional images by maximum projection. The same imaging settings were applied throughout the imaging process.
The Neurolucida software was used to quantify axon terminals of single C4 da neurons. Branches shorter than 5 μm were excluded from the analysis. For quantifying the number of longitudinal axonal branches visible between abdominal segment 4–6 (i.e., the connectives) of C4 da neurons, only complete connectives spanning neighboring segments were quantified. Fasciculated connectives were counted as two.
To eliminate experimenter’s bias, these experiments were carried out in double-blind fashion. The images acquired by the primary experimenter were coded and randomized by another lab member. After the primary experimenter quantified the data, the data were decoded for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunostaining and Imaging of Drosophila Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining of third-instar larvae was accomplished as previously described (Ye et al., 2011 (link)). Antibodies used include chicken anti-GFP (Aves, Tigard, Oregon) and rabbit anti-RFP (Rockland, Limerick, Pennsylvania). Samples were dehydrated and mounted with DPX mounting media (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Pennsylvania). Confocal imaging was completed with a Leica SP5 confocal system equipped with a resonant scanner and 63× oil-immersion lens (NA = 1.40). Images were collected and quantified as previously described (Kim et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microscopic Imaging of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For bright-field microscopy, histological sections were imaged using a slide scanner (Nanozoomer 2.0-HT C9600, Hamamatsu) 20× objective or captured with a CoolSnap camera mounted on a bright-field microscope (Provis, Olympus). For illustration purposes, images from the nanozoomer were exported in Tiff format using the NDP View2 software (Hamamatsu).
For fluorescence microscopy, images were acquired with a Leica DM 6000B system using a 40×/0.70 oil objective (tissue cultures) or a Leica SP5 confocal system (colocalization and fiber density analyses) equipped with an Argon laser (for the 488-nm excitation), a diode 561 nm and HeNe 633 nm. Z-stacks of confocal images were acquired at 1024 × 1024-pixel resolution, with a pinhole set to one Airy unit and optimal settings for gain and offset.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescent Localization of SIRT1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in situ with 4% PFA, washed with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. After blocking, cells were incubated with primary antibody against SIRT1 (Abcam #32424) overnight at 4 C. The following day, cells were washed, incubated with FITC-labeled secondary antibody for 2 h, re-washed, and nuclei were labeled with DAPI. Samples were mounted and analyzed on a Leica SP5 confocal system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!