The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

94 protocols using zorbax extend c18 column

1

Characterization of Bioactive Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mass spectra (MS) and liquid chromatogram (LC) of the non-bioactive and bioactive PAs were obtained with an Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass Quadrupole time-of-flight LC-MS apparatus equipped with an electrospray ionization source connected to a reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system, as previously described. 35 The PA molecules were dissolved in water at a concentration of 1 mg mL -1 and an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm) was used. A gradient of water (0.1% formic acid) and acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) was used for LC-MS. The PAs were treated with 0.1 M HCl solution to remove residual TFA and further lyophilized. The purification of the synthesized PAs was carried out with an Agilent 1200 preparative reverse-phase HPLC system equipped with a Zorbax Extend-C18 column (21.2 mm × 150 mm). A gradient of (a) water (0.1% TFA) and (b) acetonitrile (0.1% TFA) was flowed at a rate of 0.65 mL min -1 . The PAs were then freeze-dried prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Targeted Lipidomics for Malonyl-CoA and LCA-CoA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Malonyl-CoA and LCA-CoA were extracted according to Minkler et al. [29 (link)] and their concentrations were measured according to Blachnio-Zabielska et al. [30 (link)]. Before extraction, the internal standard: C15:0-CoA, 16:0(d4)CoA, C17-CoA, C19:0-CoA, C21:0-CoA, C23:0-CoA and 24:0-(d4)-CoA (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA) was added to all samples. The molecules were separated on a reversed-phase Agilent ZORBAX Extend-C18 column, 2.1 × 150 mm, using a binary gradient with ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) in water and NH4OH in ACN. The concentration of LCA-CoA was quantified using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Sciex QTRAP 6500+, AB Sciex Germany GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) in positive electrospray ionization (ESI) mode against the concentration standard curves prepared for each compound (C14:0-CoA, C16:0-CoA, C16:1-CoA, C18:2-CoA, C18:1-CoA, C18:0-CoA, C20:0-CoA, C22:0-CoA, C24:1-CoA and C24:0-CoA, Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenolic Profiling of Fruit Vinegars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic components in 23 fruit vinegars were analyzed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled with Photometric Diode Array detector (HPLC-PDA) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) based on the literature [17 (link)]. Separation was conducted using an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) (CA, USA) at 40 °C. Mobile phase A was formic acid solution (0.1%, v/v), and B was methanol. The procedure of gradient elution was set as: 0 min, 5% (B); 15 min, 20% (B); 20 min, 30% (B); 25 min, 37% (B); 40 min, 40% (B); 60 min, 50% (B); 65 min, 50% (B); 65.1 min, 5% (B); and 70 min, 5% (B). The spectra were scanned between 200 and 600 nm. Peak area was used to quantify phenolic compounds and the results were expressed as μg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying EPI Loading in CAO-AuNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to analyze the loading efficiency of EPI, the unloaded drug concentration of EPI-CAO-AuNPs was determined by means of HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1260, USA) at wavelength of 233 nm. A Zorbax-Extend-C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm, Agilent Technologies, USA) was used for determination of EPI with acetonitrile and water as a mobile phase. The volume ratio of acetonitrile/water was 30/70 with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), the column temperature was remained at 25 °C, and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. Methanol (10 mL) was added into 500 μL of EPI-CAO-AuNPs dispersion to make it disintegrate for releasing the loaded EPI drug. Then the mixture was oscillated for 1 min, sonicated for 5 min, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The process was repeated as above steps one time. The supernatant solution was collected and measured to calculate the residual content of EPI. The entrapment efficiency (EE) and drug loading efficiency (LE) percentages were calculated according to the following equations: EE (%, w/w) = (Mass of drug in nanoparticles/Mass of initial added drug) × 100; LE (%, w/w) = (Mass of drug in nanoparticles/Mass of nanoparticles) × 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Tea Phenolics and Caffeine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tea infusions were subjected to HPLC coupled with a PDAD (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm) for determination of phenolic compounds and caffeine. The HPLC method referred to previous literature with minor modification [23 (link)]. In brief, the mobile phase A and B were methanol and 0.1% formic (v/v), respectively, and the temperature was 35 °C with the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The elution gradient was set as follows: 5% A (0 min), 20% A (10 min), 22% A (15 min), 25% A (20 min), 40% A (40 min), 42% A (50 min), 50% A (60 min), 95% A (70 min), 5% A (70.1 min) and 5% A (75 min). Phenolic compounds and caffeine in tea infusions were identified via comparing their retention time and ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra with those of standard compounds. Quantitative analysis was performed according to the peak area under the maximal absorbance wavelength, and the contents were expressed as mg/g DW. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantity (LOQ) of this method were 2 and 5 µg/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Herbal Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC analysis of DH herbal pair extract with different proportions (20 mg/mL) was performed on the Agilent 1290 liquid chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The Agilent Zorbax Extend C-18 column (150 mm × 3.0 mm, 3.5 μm) was used for separation at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The detailed elution program was as follows: 5–8% B at 0–6 min, 8–10% B at 6–14 min, 10–15% B at 14–23 min, 15–17% B at 23–38 min, 17–22% B at 38–48 min, 22–26% B at 48–58 min, 26–40% B at 58–68 min, 40–45% B at 68–73 min, 45–60% B at 73–83 min, 60–90% B at 83–93 min, 90–100% B at 93–95 min, and 100% B at 95–98 min. The injection volume was 5 μL, the column temperature was 35 °C, and the UV detection wavelength was 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were analyzed using an Agilent 6560 IM-QTOF (Santa Clara, CA). Each measurement was performed with the corresponding drift gas maintained at approximately 4 Torr and 25 °C. Other relevant instrument parameters can be found in the Supporting Information Table S1. Chromatographic separations were performed using Agilent 1290 Infinity II UHPLC (Santa Clara, CA) coupled to the 6560 IM-QTOF. Samples were injected (10 µL) onto an Agilent ZORBAX Extend-C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.8 μm) maintained at 30 °C. Mobile phase A was water (0.1% formic acid) and mobile phase B was methanol. The flow rate was maintained at 0.400 mL/min with gradient conditions shown in Table S2. Multiplexing (4-bit) was enabled for all LC-IM-MS measurements, which allowed for a maximum ion funnel trap fill time of 3900 μs; the release time was 150 μs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RPLC-Based Fractionation and MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent 1100 HPLC system was used for reversed-phase liquid chromatography
(RPLC) separation with an Agilent Zorbax Extend-C18 column (5 μm,
150 nm × 2.1 mm) and UV detection at 210 nm and 280 nm. Mobile
phase A and mobile phase B were set to ACN-H2O (2:98, v/v)
and ACN-H2O (90:10, v/v), respectively, and the flow rate
was set to 300 μL/min. The gradient elution conditions were
as follows: 0–8 min, 98% A; 8.00–8.01 min, 98–95%
A; 8.01–38 min, 95–75% A; 38–50 min, 75–60%
A; 50–50.01 min, 60–10% A; 50.01–60 min, 10%
A; 60–60.01 min, 10–98% A; and 60.01–65 min,
98% A. The samples were collected between 8 and 50 min; the eluate
buffer was collected every minute into centrifuge tubes numbered 1–15
and cycled in this order until the end of the gradient. After collection,
frozen samples were prepared for mass spectrometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Endocannabinoids via UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) were quantified using modified ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) by the Lam method [39 (link)]. Octadeuterated endocannabinoids AEA-d8 and 2-AG-d8 were added as internal standards to the cell lysates, and all cannabinoids were isolated using solid phase extraction (SPE). UPLC–MS/MS analysis was performed using an Agilent 1290 UPLC system with a Zorbax Extend C18 column (2.1 × 150, 1.8 mm, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and interfaced with an Agilent 6460 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization source (ESI). The samples were analyzed in positive-ion mode using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Transition of the precursor to the product ion was as follows: m/z 348.3→62.1 for AEA; m/z 379.3→287.2 for 2-AG. The LODs were as follows: 2 pg/mL for AEA and 40 pg/mL for 2-AG. Analyses were performed in three independent experiments. Obtained results were normalized for milligrams of protein. Endocannabinoids concentrations are expressed as a percentage of the concentrations found in control cells (15.9 ± 0.7 and 238 ± 16 fmol/mg protein for AEA and 2-AG, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fractionation by Basic pH Reversed-Phase LC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample fractionation was performed by basic pH reversed-phase liquid chromatography (bRPLC)41 (link) with concatenated fraction combining as previously described39 (link). Briefly, samples were re-suspended in 5 % formic acid/5 % ACN and separated over a 4.6 mm x 250 mm ZORBAX Extend C18 column (5 μm, 80 Å, Agilent Technologies) on an Agilent 1260 HPLC system outfitted with a fraction collector, degasser and variable wavelength detector. The separation was performed applying a gradient build from 22 to 35 % ACN in 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate in 60 minutes at a flowrate of 0.5 mL/minute. A total of 96 fractions, which were combined as previously described39 (link). The combined fractions were dried under vacuum, re-constituted with 5 % formic acid/5 % ACN, and then analyzed by LC-MS2/MS3 for identification and quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!