The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using qiaamp dna stool extraction kit

1

Quantitative Analysis of Enteric Pathogen DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated from frozen stools using a bead beater with 3 mm-diameter solid-glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) followed by 0.1 mm zirconium beads (BIO-SPEC Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA) to disrupt cells. Cell slurry was centrifuged at 16,000 g for 1 min, then the supernatant processed using the Qiagen QIAamp DNA stool extraction kit (Hilden, Germany). Extracted DNA was precipitated with ethanol.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed on 301 samples using the Applied Biosystems 7500/700 Fast Real-Time PCR System with software V2.0.5 (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) and SYBR Green-Based fluorescent dye, as described previously [36 (link)]. The spectrophotometrically determined (Nanodrop 1000, ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA) concentration of H10407 DNA was used to estimate the number of the heat-labile toxin (LT) copies per 100 ng of total stool DNA: one nanogram of purified DNA was estimated to contain 2x105 copies of LT [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ileum C. jejuni Quantification via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The qPCR was performed to characterize the population of C. jejuni in the ileum. Briefly, to extract the DNA from 1 ml of the ileum digesta, we used the QIAamp DNA Stool extraction kit (QIAGEN). Table 2 illustrates the primers used in this study. In addition, we adopted 2−∆∆Ct method to analyze the data from the qPCR to identify the fold changes in the C. jejuni population (Feng et al., 2010 (link)). The 2−∆∆Ct displays the difference between the ΔCt values at the pre‐ and postbacterial challenge. The cycle threshold (also, Ct) is known to be the point where the fluorescence rises above the background. The qPCR system software was recruited to determine the Ct values according to the threshold line tuned manually above the noninformative fluorescent data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Campylobacter jejuni in Ileum Digesta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A real-time PCR (LightCycler 96 instrument, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used to determine the relative abundance of the colonized C. jejuni population in the ileum digesta. As the ileum is the main site of enteropathogens’ fermentation, propagation, and colonization the monogastric, the population of C. jejuni in this study was only examined in the ileum section. Initial denaturation was performed at 95°C for 5 min (1X), followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, followed by primer annealing at 60, and then 55 for 25 s for C. jejuni and total bacteria, respectively, and 20 s extension in 72°C. Table 2 shows the characteristics of primers. DNA was extracted from ileum digesta using a QIAamp DNA Stool extraction kit (QIAGEN, Germany). This study used the SYBR GREEN Master Mix (BIO FACT, Korea). A quantitative real-time PCR assay was performed using previously published primers. In this study, we used the ∆∆ Ct method to compare fold changes in the C. jejuni bacteria population and expressed the results as fold changes in the amount of C. jejuni relative to the overall bacteria population (Si et al., 2007 (link); Feng et al., 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detection of Shigella in Rectal Swabs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated from 100 μL aliquots of the rectal swab samples using the QIAamp DNA Stool Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted DNA was precipitated with ethanol in a final elution volume of 200 μL. Each DNA sample was tested for Shigella by qPCR using the previously described SYBR green-based fluorescent dye method to detect the ipaH gene (81 (link)). The primers for ipaH were originally created by Vu et al. (82 (link)). Quantitation cycle (Cq) values of <35 detected in duplicate wells were required to consider a sample qPCR positive. Controls for the qPCR assay included extraction-negative, qPCR negative, and a known qPCR positive control. While this method cannot distinguish between Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), EIEC prevalence is minimal compared with Shigella in similar geographic settings (43 (link), 83 (link)). Therefore, all of the ipaH positive samples were assumed to be Shigella (79 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Gut Microbiome 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA was extracted from the thawed colonic contents samples using the QIAamp DNA stool extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The genomic DNA was then examined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. All samples were quantified on a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Then, the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR, which used 338F forward primer (5’-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3’) and the 806R reverse primer (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’). The PCR cycle was denaturation at 94°C for 3min (1 cycle); followed by 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 50°C for 60 s, and extension at 72°C for 90 s (25 cycles), and a final extension step of 72°C for 10min. The amplicon products were purified with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, USA). Sequencing libraries were generated using the TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The library quality was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, USA). The quality libraries were finally sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform with 250 bp of paired-end reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Stool DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stool specimens were handled according to the GEMS protocol (16 (link)). DNA was isolated from frozen stool specimens by using a bead beater with 3-mm diameter solid glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and, subsequently, with 0.1-mm zirconium beads (BioSpec Products, Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA) to disrupt cells. The cell slurry was then centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 1 min, and the supernatant was processed by using QIAamp DNA Stool Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). Extracted DNA was precipitated with ethanol and shipped to the United States.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Stool Specimen Preparation and DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stool specimens were collected in sterile containers and examined within 24 h. Stools were stored at 2 to 8°C while in transit to the laboratory. Each fresh stool specimen was aliquoted into multiple tubes. All samples were analyzed by traditional microbiological tests for known bacterial, viral, and eukaryotic pathogens. Details of these methods can be found in Panchalingam et al. [43 (link)] DNA was isolated using a bead beater with 3 mm diameter solid glass beads (sigma Life Science), and subsequently 0.1 mm zirconium beads (BIO-SPEC Inc.) to disrupt cells. The cell slurry was then centrifuged at 16,000 g for 1 min, the supernatant removed and processed using the Qiagen QIAamp® DNA stool extraction kit. Extracted DNA was precipitated with 3 M sodium acetate and ethanol and the DNA shipped to the USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Stool DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stool DNA was extracted from 200 mg of stool using the QIAamp DNA stool extraction kit (Qiagen, UK) following the manufacturer’s protocol for pathogen detection. Extracted DNA was frozen and shipped to University of Edinburgh where samples were defrosted, quantified using Qubit 2 (Invitrogen), diluted and aliquoted. Aliquoted samples were shipped to the University of Warwick for high-throughput sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Faecal Microbiome Profiling by NGS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbial DNA from faecal samples was isolated using repeated bead beating (Salonen et al., 2010) (link) and the QIAamp DNA stool extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA concentration was assessed using a Qubit spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Boston, MA). The samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 PCR amplification and the amplicons were indexed and characterised by next generation sequencing (NGS) using an Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) as previously described (Virtanen et al., 2019) (link) in order to assess changes in faecal microbiota composition. To assess the microbiotic profiles sequencing reads were processed with Mothur v. 1.35.1 using Greengenes version 13.5, containing OTUs clustered at 99% sequence identity, as the reference database (Schloss et al., 2009) (link). Taxonomic classification on species level were used in further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Profiling Gut Microbiome Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from stool pellets using QIAamp stool DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following manufacturer's instructions. Bacterial composition of the stool samples was assessed by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) as described previously with some modifications [33] (link). Briefly, the intergenic regions between bacterial 16S and 23S rRNA genes were amplified using broad range primers 1406F (labeled at the 5′end with the phosphoramidite dye 5-FAM) and 23Sr. The intergenic lengths of 6-FAM labeled PCR products were determined on an ABI 3730 capillary sequencer (Applied biosystems, Grand Island, NY) using LIZ-1200 size standard and electropherograms were analyzed using peak scanner (Applied biosystems, Grand Island, NY). Real-time qPCR was performed on stool DNA using group-specific primers [34] (link) to determine the relative abundance of individual bacterial groups. A standard curve for each primer pair was plotted using plasmid with appropriate 16S rRNA gene sequence insert to quantify the qPCR values into 16S copy number/g of normalized stool.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!