The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates are based on the results of disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The disk diffusion method is according to CLSI guidelines [16 (link)]. Eleven different antibiotics were used to assess the susceptibility test including imipenem (10 µg), cefepime, (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), amikacin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), ticarcillin (75 µg), piperacillin (100 mg), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (25 µg), carbenicillin (100 µg) and streptomycin (10 µg) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA).
Broth dilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration according to CLSI guidelines [16 (link)]. The antibiotics imipenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, amikacin, gentamicin, tetracycline, ticarcillin, piperacillin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, carbenicillin and streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for MIC determination. Multidrug resistance was defined in this analysis as resistance following five drug classes: Extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime), beta lactamase inhibitor penicillin (ticarcillin, piperacillin and carbenicillin), aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin and streptomycin), Folate pathway inhibitors (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) and carbapenems (imipenem).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Agar Dilution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The agar dilution method was carried out using agent-dependent two-fold dilution concentrations: doxycycline (from 0.004 to 8 mg/L), rifampicin (from 0.004 to 8 mg/L), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (from 0.016/0.29 to 8/152 mg/L), streptomycin (from 0.008 to 16 mg/L) and gentamicin (from 0.004 to 8 mg/L) (all from Sigma-Aldrich). The antimicrobial reagents were diluted and dissolved according to the EUCAST Definitive Document [38 (link)] with BB agar and CAMHB agar. The inocula were adjusted to McFarland 0.5 in 0.9% NaCl; 1 µL was spotted onto culture plates and incubated for 48 h with 5% CO2, and the MIC values were determined as the lowest concentration with no visible growth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Stock Solution Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotics including amikacin, azithromycin, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, clofazimine, daptomycin, disulfiram, doxycycline, gentamicin, methylene blue, miconazole, nitrofurantoin, rifampin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), were purchased from Sigma & Aldrich and were dissolved in appropriate solvents [37 ] to form stock solutions. All the antibiotic stocks were filter-sterilized by 0.2 μm filter except the DMSO stocks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of MRSA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility profiles for the VT-MRSA isolates were determined using the MIC technique via the microdilution method according to the CLSI 2013 [32 ], as described in the previous section. MIC tests were performed for ampicillin (Sigma-Aldrich), ceftazidime (Pfizer; México DF, México), ceftriaxone (Roche; Mexico DF, México), ciprofloxacin (Bayer; Levenkusen Westfalia, Germany), erythromycin (MP Biomedicals; Solon, OH, USA), kanamycin (Sigma-Aldrich), meropenem (Astra Zeneca; México DF, Mexico), rifampicin (MP Biomedicals), gentamicin (MP Biomedicals), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

NMR Spectroscopy and Column Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR spectra were measured with a JEOL Eclipse 500 FT-NMR spectrometer (1H, 500 MHz; 13C 125 MHz). Column chromatography was carried on silica-gel (Kieselgel 60, 70–230 mesh, Merck, Germany), a thin layer chromatography (TLC) on pre-coated Silica-gel F254 (0.25 mm, Merck) and Sephadex LH-20 (25–100 µM, Sigma, U.S.A). Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) and Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) (Difco Laboratories, Baltimore, MD, USA). Ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, chloramphenicol, cephalothin, sulfisoxazole, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ticarcillin, ciprofloxacin, N,N′-Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide, Sodium azide, Tris, Triton X-100 and solvents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard amikacin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, ertapenem, gentamicin, imipenem (U.S. Pharmacopeia, Rockville, MD, USA), ampicillin, cephalothin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, colistin sulfate, doripenem, meropenem, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), fosfomycin (Ercros, Barcelona, Spain), and tigecycline (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) were used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations and susceptibility interpretation criteria followed the Clinical Laboratory and Standard Institute (CLSI) and Federal Drug Administration (FDA) standards [11 ,12 (link)]. The MICs of the drugs, except tigecycline and colistin, were measured by agar dilution in Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) according to CLSI recommendations.11 For fosfomycin susceptibility, glucose-6-phosphate (25 mg/mL) was added to the agar plate. tigecycline and colistin MICs were determined by microdilutions in freshly prepared cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CAMHB). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control strain [13 (link)]. The MICs of other agents were determined using the custom-designed panels for Gram-negative bacilli (Sensititre, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oakwood Village, OH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibacterial Drugs Comparative Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following drugs were tested: amoxicillin-clavulanate (Sigma, lot 100M08228v; USP, lot J0G109), azithromycin (USP, lot G; Sigma, lot E446421/1v), cefdinir (Sigma, lot 117K1392), cefpodoxime (USP, lot HDKD09), clarithromycin (USP, lot GIG324), doxycycline (Sigma, lot BCBF9827V), penicillin (Sigma, lot BCBF3866V), solithromycin (Cempra, lot EKS11646), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Sigma, lots 000M4110V and BCBF0534V). The drugs were dissolved and diluted for testing in accordance with the recommendations of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M100-S25 (12 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobials ampicillin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, gentamicin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ertapenem, and colistin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). MICs of the antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar-dilution technique, except the broth-microdilution technique was used for colistin. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria were used for interpreting the MICs39 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Disk diffusion method was performed using commercial antibiotic disks and Muller–Hinton agar, according to the CLSI recommendations [14 ]. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for four antibiotics, i.e., ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (Sigma–Aldrich), by using the 96-well broth microdilution (CLSI, 2018) method. Stock antibiotic solutions were prepared accordingly with CLSI and conserved at −20 °C. The broth microdilution testing domain was of 4 to 1 µg/mL for ciprofloxacin, 4 to 1 µg/mL for ceftriaxone, 150 to 18 µg/mL for nitrofurantoin, and 100 to 25 µg/mL for trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. All panels were incubated at 37 °C and read after 18–24 h. The lowest antibiotic concentration that completely inhibited the visible microbial growth and was confirmed by the spectrophotometer reading was recorded as the MIC value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MICs were determined using the broth microdilution method, following the CSLI guidelines [48 ]. The tests were conducted in ISO-Sensitest Broth (Oxoid, Hamsphire, UK), according to recommendations of the International Standard ISO 20776-1. Standard antibiotics were also included in the assays in order to compare their activity and efficacy. In particular, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, vancomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Sigma Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), and colistin (MPBiomedicals, Eschwege, Germany) were investigated.
Briefly, broth microdilution was performed in polystyrene 96-well round bottomed plates in a final volume of 100 μL. Serial two-fold dilutions of the antimicrobial ranging from 128 mg/L to 0.03 mg/L were used. In addition, wells with bacteria alone and with growth media alone were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. As for the inoculum, after an overnight incubation in agar plates, bacterial colonies were resuspended in 0.9% NaCl to reach a 0.5 McFarland (equivalent to 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) and diluted to obtain a final concentration in the well of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. Finally, the plates were incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. MIC values were expressed in mg/L. We performed three technical and three biological replicates for each agent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!