The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using puc19

1

Cloning and Expression of Erv1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ERV1 gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from complementary DNA (cDNA) of S. cerevisiae YPH499 using primers ERV1F1 and ERV1R1. The cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription PCR using a PrimeScrip RT-PCR Kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) from total RNA extracted from S. cerevisiae YPH499 cells using NucleoSpin RNA (Takara Bio). The PCR product was cloned between SphI and BamHI sites of pUC19 (Takara Bio). After the sequence was checked, the ERV1 gene was subcloned between NdeI and XhoI sites of pET-22b (Novagen) to give pET-ERV1. pET-ERV1 was used for Erv1 protein preparation. The plasmids for preparation of Erv1 variant proteins were constructed by inverse PCR using corresponding primer pairs and templates (Additional file 1: Table S1). For expression of ERV1 and its mutant genes in S. cerevisiae cells, the ERV1 gene was amplified by PCR from pET-ERV1 using primers ERV1F2 and ERV1R2. The PCR product was cloned between NheI and BamHI sites of pGK406 designed for target gene expression in S. cerevisiae [20 (link)]. The mutant genes coding Erv1 variants were also amplified by the same primer pairs and cloned into pGK406.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated CD98hc Disruption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KO was performed as recently described [51 (link), 52 (link)] using pX330 and pCAG-EGxxFP [53 (link)] purchased from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA). For CRISPR/Cas9-based CD98hc (SLC3A2) gene disruption, guide (g) RNA sequences (5′-GCCGCGTTGTCGCGAGCTAC-3′) corresponding to the CD98hc gene (318-bp ~ 337-bp from the initiation ATG site) were designed using CRISPR direct (https://crispr.dbcls.jp/). The efficiency of KO by pX330 plasmids expressing codon-optimized SpCas9 and chimeric gRNA was confirmed by double-strand break-mediated enhanced GFP reconstitution with co-transfection of pX330 and pCAG-EGxxFP plasmids into HEK293 cells. Cells were seeded into 35-mm dishes (BD BioCoat, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in 1 mL of RD medium, grown to 80% confluency, and plasmid DNA (5 μg) was introduced into cells using Xfect transfection reagent (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). In the case of SW1116 cells, co-transfection of pX330 and pUC19 (#3219, Takara) containing the puromycin-resistant gene was carried out, and cells were cultured with puromycin (Invitrogen, 2 μg/mL) for 10 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Enzymatic Fragmentation of Synthetic DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fragments of 1,114‐bp were synthesized by PCR amplification using plasmid DNA (pUC19) purchased from Takara Bio Inc. (catalog No. 3219) as a template and primers, the base sequences of which were 5′-GCACTGCATAATTCTCTTAC-3′ and 5′-GGCTTTACACTTTATGCTTC-3′, and then isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis and phenol extraction. Note that the DNA fragments we synthesized had no phosphate group at their both ends since each primer used in the PCR had hydroxyl group instead of phosphate group at the 5′ end. The prepared DNA fragments were digested with restriction enzyme AatII (EC 3.1.21.4, Takara Bio Inc.) producing 611- and 499-bp DNA fragments with 4-bp overhangs and then the DNA was recovered by ethanol precipitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Random Mutagenesis and Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Escherichia coli (E. coli) DH5α and pUC19 (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) were used for the construction of random mutagenesis libraries. The E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) and the pET-21b (+) plasmid (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) was used for protein expression. Restriction endonucleases, DNA polymerase and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Hudson, NH, USA). N-octanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone (C8-HSL) and p-nitrophenyl acetate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and purchased from commercial sources, unless indicated otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SAMD9L Expression via Bicistronic Vector

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bicistronic vector with MND promoter (Astrakhan et al., 2012 (link)) driving transcription of enhanced GFP followed by T2A sequence and 3xF. The vector had either no gene or the human SAMD9L (GenBank accession no. NM_152703) sequence (Origene) inserted downstream of the T2A and N-terminal 3xF using In-Fusion cloning (Takara Bio). The coding sequence ends with a stop codon and the woodchuck hepatitis virus posttranscriptional regulatory element proximal to the polyadenylation site. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using QuikChange II (Agilent). The pCVL.SFFV.Y2 I-AniI.IRES.mCherry vector contains the spleen focus-forming virus promoter (Aubert et al., 2011 (link)). pUC19 (Takara Bio) DNA was used as the carrier DNA for the mCherry-alone condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Acetic Acid Bacteria Cultivation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetic acid bacteria (AAB) used in this study are listed in Table S2, and were obtained from culture collections including JCM, NBRC, IAM, NRIC, ATCC, and DSM. Escherichia coli HST08 for general cloning host, pUC19 as a cloning vector, and pMD19 as a TA cloning vector were purchased from Takara Bio Inc. (Shiga, Japan). An ampicillin-resistant pMV24 plasmid was used as an Acetobacter spp.-E. coli shuttle vector25 (link). Oligonucleotide primers used for PCR are summarized in Table S5. AABs were grown at 30 °C in YPG medium [containing (per liter): yeast extract, 5 g; hipolypeptone, 3 g; glucose, 30 g]. E. coli was grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium. For preparation of solid medium, 1.5% agar was added. To select transformants of E. coli and Acetobacter spp., ampicillin was added at 40  μ g/mL. All chemicals and enzymes used were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical (Osaka, Japan) and Takara Bio Inc., respectively, unless otherwise indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasmid DNA Acquisition and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three plasmid DNA (pUC19, pHSG298, and pHSG396) were purchased from Takara Biotechnology (China) Co., Ltd. The plasmids were suspended in the solution of 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) and 1 mM EDTA at a concentration of 0.5 μg μl-1. pUC19 (2686 bp), pHSG298 (2675 bp), and pHSG396 (2238 bp) carry ampicillin, kanamycin, and chloramphenicol resistance genes, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). NaCl, tryptone, and yeast extract in biotechnology grade were purchased from Oxoid (England) Co, Ltd. Agar powder, ampicillin sodium salt, kanamycin, and chloramphenicol were purchased from Solarbio Science and Technology (China) Co., Ltd. CaCl2⋅2H2O and propidium iodide were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Escherichia coli Strain Collection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Escherichia coli CVCC196, E. coli CVCC216, E. coli CVCC220, E. coli CVCC223, E. coli CVCC224, E. coli CVCC1500, E. coli CVCC1502, E. coli CVCC1513, E. coli CVCC1514, E. coli CVCC1519, E. coli CVCC1496, E. coli CVCC2943, and E. coli Ae1 were obtained from the China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control (IVDC). E. coli ATCC25922 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). E. coli DH5α was purchased from BestBio (Shanghai, China). Supercoiled plasmid pBR322 and pUC-19 were purchased from Takara (Dalian, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Knockout in SW1116 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KO was performed as recently described18, 25, 33 using pX330 and pCAG‐EGxxFP34 purchased from Addgene. In CRISPR/Cas9‐based gene disruption, guide (g) RNA sequences (5’‐AGCTGTGGCAGCGTCAACAG‐3′) corresponding to the MET gene (394–413 bp from the initiation ATG site), (5’‐GAGGGCGAACGACGCTCTGC‐3′) HER3 gene (3–22 bp from the initiation ATG site), and FOXM1(5’‐CCGTCGGCCACTGATTCTCA‐3′) gene (15–33 bp from the initiation ATG site) were designed using CRISPR direct (https://crispr.dbcls.jp/). SW1116 cells were used to generate HER3 and/or MET and the FOXM1‐KO cell line using the pX330 (Addgene) and pCAG‐EG × ×FP (Addgene) CRISPR/Cas9 vectors. The gene‐specific region of gRNA sequences was designed by the CRISPR design tool from CRISPR direct (https:/crispr.dbcls.jp/). Single clones were picked up and the KO efficiency was assessed by WB and FCM. Cells were seeded onto 35‐mm dishes (BD BioCoat, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) in 1 mL of RD medium, and plasmid DNA (5 μg) was introduced into cells of approximately 80% confluency using Xfect transfection reagent (Takara Bio Inc.). The co‐transfection of pX330 and pUC19 (#3219, Takara Bio) containing the puromycin‐resistant gene was also performed, and cells were cultured with puromycin (Invitrogen, 2 μg/mL) for 10 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Construction and Characterization of lsrR and mdtH Overexpressing Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lsrR- and mdtH-overexpressing strains were constructed in accordance with the followed methods. Briefly, the lsrR and mdtH ORF were amplified by PCR using primers lsrR-KpnI-f and lsrR-EcoRI-r and primers mdtH-KpnI-f and mdtH-EcoRI-r, respectively, from WT chromosomal DNA. The fragment was gel purified and cloned into the KpnI and EcoRI sites of pUC19 (TaKaRa, Dalian, Liaoning, China) to use the lacZ promoter in the plasmid to drive lsrR and mdtH expression, and then transformed into E. coli DH5α chemically competent cells. The transformed cells were then spread on LB agar with 100 μg/mL Amp. Positive colonies were selected and confirmed by PCR using primers M13-f and M13-r, and the recombinant plasmid pUC19-lsrR and pUC19-mdtH were extracted and further confirmed by DNA sequencing (data not shown). The purified recombinant plasmid pUC19-lsrR and pUC19-mdtH and the control vector pUC19 were transformed into the WT parent strain to generate strains WT/pUClsrR, WT/pUCmdtH, and WT/pUC19, respectively. The growth rates of each strain were determined by detecting the cell density (600 nm) at each time point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!