The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Evo 50 xvp scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in United States, Germany

The Zeiss EVO 50 XVP is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of various materials. The instrument utilizes an electron beam to scan the surface of a sample, generating detailed images and providing information about the sample's composition and structure. The EVO 50 XVP is equipped with a variable pressure (VP) system, allowing for the examination of both conductive and non-conductive samples without the need for extensive sample preparation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using evo 50 xvp scanning electron microscope

1

Meso-structure Characterization of Polyamide 6

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A GE Phoenix X-ray micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) system, equipped with a flat Dynamic 41|100 digital detector, was used to perform the μ-CT scans of the specimens to examine the morphological features of their meso-structure. The detector offered a 410 × 410 mm2 detection area and a 100 μm pixel side size. The entire gauge lengths of two N090, two N45, one W090, one W45, one RP, and one HC were analyzed before testing. The volume reconstructions were carried out with VGSTUDIO MAX 3.4 [30 ] software by Volume Graphics. The scanning parameters used for each specimen type are reported in Table 1, along with the number of consecutive volumes acquired to frame their entire gauge length.
The fracture surfaces of two tensile specimens per type were observed on a Zeiss EVO 50XVP Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). A thin gold layer was sputtered on the observed surfaces prior to scanning to enhance the quality of the images due to the low electrical conductivity of the polyamide 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Protein Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coverslips of RF/6A cells were incubated with OmpA coated or control beads as described above. The coverslips were fixed in 2.0% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for 1 h at room temperature. The coverslips were subjected to two 10-min washes in 0.1 M sodium cadodylate and fixed in 1.0% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for 1 h. The coverslips were rinsed two more times with 0.1 M sodium cadodylate buffer for 10 min each. The samples were dehydrated by successive 5-min incubations in 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol, 80% ethanol, 95% ethanol, and three 10-min washes in 10% ethanol. Next, the samples were incubated three times for 30 min each in hexamethyldisilazane, air-dried, mounted with silver paint, and sputter coated with gold before imaging on a Zeiss EVO 50XVP scanning electron microscope (Thornwood, NY). For HL-60 cells incubated in suspension with beads, the samples were retained on a 0.1 μm filter and processed exactly as described for RF/6A cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Oral Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures of ΔSSA_0351 and S. sanguinis SK36 were diluted 1 : 100 in BHI and grown to late log phase. Bacterial samples were deposited onto a 0.1 µm disposable Millipore filter to remove medium. Samples were fixed using 2 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 30 min, followed by 1 % osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). The samples embedded in the filters were then dehydrated in ethanol followed by PBS and allowed to air dry. The filters were sectioned and mounted onto stubs and coated with gold for 3 min (EMS– 550 Automated Sputter Coater, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Micrographs were taken at 10 000 and 20 000× total magnification using a Zeiss EVO 50 XVP scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Peabody, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Analysis of Tick's Double Anus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the structural features of the tick with double anus in detail, we studied the tick samples by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Sample preparation and SEM microscopy were performed at the Virginia Commonwealth University Microscopy Facility (Richmond, VA, USA). Briefly, tick samples were removed from storage in 70% ethanol and dehydrated through a series of ethanol solutions (70, 80, 95, and 3 changes of 100%), following which they were critical point dried using an Autosamdri-814 Critical Point dryer (Tousimis Research Corp., Rockville, MD, USA). The samples were then mounted on standard aluminum SEM mounts and sputter-coated with gold–palladium, using an EMS 550 × sputter coater (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Electron micrographs were captured using a Zeiss EVO 50 XVP scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) operating at 10.00 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SEM Visualization of Bacterial Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following overnight incubation, 0.5 ml of each culture was deposited onto a 0.1 µm disposable Millipore filter to remove BHI broth. The samples were fixed using 2 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, followed by 1 % osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. Samples embedded in the filters were then dehydrated in ethanol and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) and finally allowed to air-dry. The filters were sectioned and mounted. Prior to visualization samples were coated with gold for 3 min (EMS-550 Automated Sputter Coater; Electron Microscopy Sciences). Micrographs were taken at ×20 000, ×30 000 and ×40 000 total magnification using a ZEISS EVO50 XVP scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of P. gingivalis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Untreated or treated P. gingivalis cells were deposited onto a 0.1 μm disposable Millipore filter to remove medium, and samples were fixed using 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 30 min, followed by 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). Samples embedded in the filters were then dehydrated in ethanol followed by hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) and allowed to air-dry. The filters were sectioned and mounted onto stubs and coated with gold for three minutes (EMS– 550 Automated Sputter Coater, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Micrographs were taken at 30,000× total magnification using a Zeiss EVO 50 XVP scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Peabody, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!