The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using meropenem

1

Isolation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolation of E. coli was performed as follows: liquid aspirates were diluted approximately ×106 fold with sterile PBS (phosphate saline buffer). Approximately 0.05 ml volume of feces were placed into 0.5 ml of sterile PBS, vortexed to homogeneity, an aliquot was diluted approximately ×106 fold. Biopsy samples were vortexed in 0.2 ml of sterile PBS. For all samples, 0.1 ml of the resulting liquid was spread onto the Luria-Bertani agar plates. After overnight incubation on 37 °C, isolated colonies were identified with the Matrix Assisted Laser Desorbtion/Ionization (MALDI) Biotyper software (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) using the Microflex LT mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). For DNA extraction, all E. coli strains were grown in the Luria-Bertani broth at 37 °C with shaking (200 RPM) overnight and collected by centrifugation. Samples and corresponding E. coli isolates are listed in Table 1.
The testing of susceptibility to ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (all from Bio-Rad, USA) was performed by the disc-diffusion method using the Mueller-Hinton agar plates. The E. coli strain ATCC 25922 was used as a control. Current CLSI and EUCAST criteria were used for interpretation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Antibiotic Susceptibility with EUCAST Standards

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was determined on Müller–Hinton agar by standard disc diffusion method as recommended by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST; www.eucast.org). Seventeen antibiotics were tested, including ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, aztreonam, amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem and colistin (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). The MIC for imipenem was determined using the Etest method (bioMérieux, La Balmes les Grottes, France) and the result was interpreted according to the EUCAST breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae (susceptible if MIC ≤ 2 mg/L)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by employing disk diffusion, gradient test, and broth microdilution test according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations, 2021 [43 ]. The disks impregnated with the following antimicrobial agents were tested: imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ceftazidime (10 µg), cefepime (30 µg), amikacin (30 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (30/6 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), ticarcillin (75 µg), ceftazidime-avibactam (10–4 µg), and ceftolozane/tazobactam (38–10 µg) (BioRad, Watford, UK). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for colistin, imipenem, and meropenem were evaluated by ComASP Colistin (Liofilchem, Roseto, Italy) and Gradient strip test (Liofilchem, Roseto, Italy), respectively. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as the control strain in the antibiotic susceptibility testing. MDR P. aeruginosa were defined as isolates that tested resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent of three or more different classes. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa were defined as a subset of MDR isolates that tested non-susceptible to at least one antimicrobial agent of five different classes. P. aeruginosa was defined as pandrug-resistant (PDR) when the organism was resistant to all tested agents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the clinical isolates was determined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton II agar as recommended by the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM: Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie) [52 ]. The 14 antimicrobial drugs tested (all from Bio-Rad) were (i) beta-lactam antibiotics class: ticarcillin (TIC, 75 μg), ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (TCC, 75 / 10 μg), piperacillin (PIP, 75 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (PPT, 75 / 10 μg) ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg), cefepime (FEP, 30 μg), aztreonam (ATM, 30 μg), imipenem (IPM, 10 μg) and meropenem (MEM, 10 μg), (ii) aminoglycosid antibiotics class: gentamicin (GMI, 15 μg), amikacin (AKN, 30 μg), tobramycin (TMN, 10 μg), (iii) fluoroquinolone antibiotics class: ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg) and (iv) other antibiotic class: fosfomycin (FF, 50 μg + 50 μg G6P).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by disk diffusion (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by in house broth microdilution (colistin, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, flumequine and oxytetracycline) and E-test® (fosfomycin; bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA), as previously described [55 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was measured with the use of the standard disc diffusion process suggested by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines by broth microdilution and E-test (cat. nos. 537300, 501800, 533500, 501300, 501600, 506710, 513800, 526000, 523600, 525508, 522000, 503500 and 521400; AB Biodisk; BioMérieux Inc.) (17 ). A total of 14 antibiotics were tested, including ampicillin-sulbactam, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, aminoglycoside antibiotic amikacin, macrolide antibiotic azithromycin, β-lactam antibiotic aztreonam, β-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam, cephalosporin antibiotics ceftazidime and cephalothin, rifampin and tigecycline, carbapenem antibiotic meropenem and colistin, and the glycopeptide antibiotics teicoplanin and vancomycin (Bio-Rad, Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). These antibiotics are of different classes and have different killing mechanisms on the bacteria. The E-test technique was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem. The results were interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines from 2015 (18 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disc diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar, in accordance with the guidelines of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM & EUCAST, 2014 ). The following 32 antimicrobial drugs (Bio-Rad) were tested: ampicillin, ticarcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, streptomycin, spectinomycin, kanamycin, amikacin, gentamicin, netilmicin, tigecycline, isepamicin, nalidixic acid, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, tetracycline and azithromycin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin and azithromycin were determined by Etests (bioMérieux). E. coli CIP 76.24 (ATCC 25922) was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!