The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Centrivap console

Manufactured by Labconco
Sourced in United States

The CentriVap Console is a compact, benchtop evaporation system designed to efficiently remove solvents and concentrate samples. It features a temperature-controlled condensing chamber to collect and trap evaporated vapors.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using centrivap console

1

Metabolomic Extraction from Serum and Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volumes of 120 μL frozen serum aliquots were mixed with 480 μL extraction solution by mixing methanol and acetonitrile (2:1). The extraction solution contained two standards (2-chloro-L-phenylalanine and decanoic acid). Samples were vortexed for 120 s and then placed at 4°C for 30 min. Following centrifugation for 10 min at 14000 rpm, the supernatant was split into two aliquots (250 μL each aliquot), and one of the supernatant aliquots was used for analysis and one for backup. The aliquot to be analyzed was dried via evaporation in Labconco Centrivap Console and was then dissolved in 125 μL 50% methanol and centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was moved to 200 μL MicroSert Insert for analysis.
Brain tissue (100 mg) was homogenized in 1000 μL extraction solution by mixing methanol acetonitrile (2:1), then placed at 4°C for 30 min. The extraction solution contained two standards (2-chloro-L-phenylalanine and decanoic acid). Following centrifugation for 10 min at 14000 rpm, the supernatant was split into two aliquots (400 μL each aliquot), one of the supernatant aliquots was used for analysis and the other was stored for backup. The aliquot used for analysis was dried via evaporation in Labconco Centrivap Console and then was dissolved in 200 μL 50% methanol and centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was moved to 200 μL MicroSert Insert for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction and Isolation of Leaf Surface Waxes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The shoots with concurrent bud break were selected, and the fourth leaf from each shoot was harvested. Twenty leaves were randomly selected and pooled together as one biological replicate; four biological replicates were used. EWs were removed by gum arabic; the film was collected into a glass tube containing 21 ml of chloroform:water (2:1, v/v), and 75 μg of n-tetracosane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, United States) was added as internal standard. After vigorous agitation and phase separation, the organic phase was transferred into a new glass tube. Extraction was repeated with another 4.5 ml of extraction buffer. The organic phases were combined and evaporated under CentriVap Console (Labconco, KS, United States). The adaxial EWs were firstly removed and then abaxial EWs were isolated from the same batch of leaves.
After EW removal from both leaf surfaces by gum arabic, the leaves were still physically intact, and were used to extract IWs. The adaxial IWs were rinsed five times by chloroform; the elution was collected into a glass beaker. Abaxial IWs were isolated in the same manner. The elution was dried down by CentriVap Console to recover IWs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cysteine Labeling of Actin Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cysteine side chains of pVIc, 8-Actin-C, 11-Actin-C were labelled at a concentration of 200 μM in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 25 mM NaCl, and 20 mM ethanol by the addition of Cy3B-maleimide to 600 μM. Labelling reactions were incubated at 21 °C in the dark for 2.5 h. Dye-conjugated peptides were purified from unreacted dye and peptide on a 15 cm × 4.6 mm Discovery C18, 5 μm column. Peptides were eluted via a linear acetonitrile gradient from 0 to 40% in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The conjugated peptide peak was identified by MALDI-TOF analysis. The fractions were evaporated to dryness on a LABCONCO Centrivap Console and resuspended in water. The concentration of the dye-conjugated peptide was determined by measuring the dye concentration spectrophotometrically using . The conjugated peptide was aliquoted, dried and stored at –20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tea Volatiles Isolation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tea volatile isolation was conducted following the method described before [8 (link)]. Briefly, fresh tea leaves (4.0 g) were ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen; then, the tea powder was transferred into a 50 mL glass tube; and 40 mL of diethyl ether, 64.5 µg of ethyl caprate, and 4.0 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate were added and extracted for 2 h under room temperature. The supernatant was distilled with an Engel apparatus to remove nonvolatile substances, and the distillate was concentrated to ~500 µL in CentriVap Console (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) before GC analysis.
Tea volatile identification and quantification were performed following the method described before [8 (link)]. Each sample was analyzed with GC–MS and GC–FID (GC–MS QP2010 plus, Shimadzu, Japan). Individual volatile FID peak areas were calibrated by their RFD values (relative to ethyl caprate) and then normalized to ethyl caprate peak area and sample weights.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tumor Lipid Extraction and Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor samples were extracted by liquid-liquid extraction method, as previously described by [26 (link)]. Briefly, frozen tumors were thawed, weighed (100 mg), and homogenized using the Polytron PT 2100 instrument in pH 7.4 saline (1:4 w/v). Tumor homogenate (100 μL) was then transferred to another tube and the internal standard EHop-0036 (10 μL from 4500 ng/mL stock) was added to the samples followed by vortex (30 s). A hundred microliters (100 μL) of sodium hydroxide 0.5 M were then added to the mixture and samples were mixed by vortex for 5 min. Afterwards, 790 μL of heptane: ethyl acetate mixture (1:1) were added and samples were vortexed again for 10 min. The upper layer was recovered following centrifugation (5 min at 510 × g) and the solvent was evaporated for one hour in a Centrivap console (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) at room temperature. Samples were then reconstituted with 100 μL of methanol, vortexed for ten minutes, and centrifuged at 1000× g for 1 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Leaf Wax Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total wax extraction follow the method described by Racovita12 (link) with minor modification. To exclude potential system contaminations, blank samples were prepared in the same way as other samples, except that no leaves were added. The second leaf and the fifth leaf were removed from twigs, individual leaf was photographed, and leaf area was calculated by Image J software. Twenty of the second leaf were randomly selected and pooled together as one biological replicate; for the fifth leaf 10 leaves were randomly selected and pooled together as one biological replicate. In total, four biological replicates were prepared for the second leaf and the fifth leaf, respectively. Tea leaves were put into glass beaker, 13 mL of chloroform containing 100 µg of internal standard n-tetracosane was added such that the leaves became fully submerged. After stirring for 30 s at room temperature, the chloroform was transferred to another glass vial. The extraction step was repeated once. These two extractions were combined and dried under CentriVap Console (Labconco, KS, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nisin Extraction from Fecal Pellets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect nisin in the fecal pellets, the nisin was extracted from the pellets as described by Rea et al. (2014 (link)) with minor modifications as follows: composite fecal samples were suspended in 1 mL of 0.1% TFA and 70% IPA, vortexed thoroughly and allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 × g and the supernatant retained. The centrifugation step was repeated a further three times with the supernatant retained each time. In order to bring the IPA content of the samples to <7%, IPA was removed using a Centrivap Console (Labconco, Kansas City, US) and the samples were then restored to their original volumes using 0.1% TFA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Relative Electrical Conductivity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaves of WT and cor413-pm1 seedlings (0.03 g) of both the control and freezing treatments were collected into 15 mL tubes containing 5 mL deionized water. They were vacuumed for 30 min with a CentriVap console (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) and then sat for 45 min at room temperature. The electrical conductivity (EC) of each sample was measured as S1, and deionized water without leaves was measured as S0. All samples were boiled for 10 min and then reduced to room temperature, and the final EC was measured as S2. The relative electrical conductivity was calculated as follows: REC = (S1 − S0)/(S2 − S0) [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Characterization of Epicuticular and Intracuticular Waxes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The epicuticular waxes were isolated by the method described in the study by Zhang et al. (2020) (link). Delipidated gum arabic in 90% (w/w) aqueous solution was evenly applied to the leaf surface by a soft paintbrush; dry polymer film was peeled off and collected into a glass tube containing 21 ml of chloroform: water (2:1, v/v) and 75 μg of internal standard n-tetracosane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, United States). After vigorous vortexing and phase separation, the organic phase was transferred into a new glass tube. The extraction was repeated once, and the organic phases were combined and evaporated under the CentriVap Console (Labconco, KS, United States) to obtain epicuticular waxes. The adaxial epicuticular waxes were isolated first, followed by the isolation of abaxial epicuticular waxes.
After the removal of epicuticular waxes, the leaves were used to extract the intracuticular waxes by rinsing with chloroform (Zhang et al., 2020 (link)). The adaxial intracuticular waxes were rinsed first, followed by rinsing with the abaxial intracuticular waxes. The collected chloroform solution was evaporated dry to get the adaxial or the abaxial intracuticular waxes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction and Analysis of Metal Contaminants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An aliquot of the filter (¼) was cut and weighted in an analytical balance (Shimadzu, Brazil, ±0.0002g). The filters were subsequently extracted using the following steps: 1) 120ml of n-hexane (Vetec, Brazil) and sonication for 2hr; 2) re-extraction with 120ml of acetone (Vetec, Brazil) and sonication for 2hr; 3) re-extraction with 120ml of ultrapure water (Millipore, USA) and sonication for 2hr. An aliquot of the aqueous extract was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma and optical emission spectrometry (ICP-MS or OES) to determine the metal concentrations. Metals in organic extracts were not analyzed since the ICP flame is extinguished. For cells exposure, organic extracts were dried with a nitrogen stream and aqueous extracts with a Centrivap console (Labconco). The extract mass was determined gravimetrically, subsequently the organic fractions were dissolved in DMSO and the aqueous fractions in water to a concentration of 100mg/ml. Blank filters were analyzed in the same manner. All extracts were stored in individual vials at −20°C until further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!