The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using superdex 200 increase 5 150 gl column

1

Oligomeric State Analysis of Antidin sbAvd-7

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oligomeric state of the antidin sbAvd-7 was analyzed with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a liquid chromatography instrument (CBM-20A, Shimadzu Corporation) equipped with an autosampler (SIL-20A), UV-Vis (SDP-20A), and a fluorescence detector (RF-20Axs). The instrument was integrated with a static light scattering instrument (SLS, Zetasizer μV light scattering detector (Malvern Instruments Ltd.)) to determine molecular weight of the eluted proteins. The instrument was controlled using Lab Solutions Version 5.51 (Shimadzu Corporation) and OmniSEC 4.7 (Malvern Instruments Ltd.). Samples (~50 μg in 10–100 μl) were injected onto a Superdex200 Increase 5/150GL column (GE Healthcare) and equilibrated with the buffer the protein was dialyzed against (50 mM sodium phosphate, 650 mM NaCl, pH 7) with a flow rate of 0.1 ml/min at 20°C. Molecular weight determination was done by calculating a standard curve based on the elution volume of the molecular weight markers (CA, carbonic anhydrase 29 kDa; BSA, Bovine Serum Albumin 66 kDa; ADH, Alcohol Dehydrogenase 150 kDa; BA, ß-Amylase 200 kDa, Sigma-Aldrich), and alternatively, using the light-scattering intensity-based determination protocol involving BSA (monomeric peak) in SLS detector calibration using a Malvern microV detector and the OmniSEC software (Malvern Instruments Ltd.) (Fig 6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Molecular Weight Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytical size-exclusion chromatography was performed on a Superdex 200 Increase 5/150 GL column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with storage buffer. Blue dextran (2000 kDa), ferritin (440 kDa), aldolase (158 kDa), conalbumin (75 kDa), ovalbumin (43 kDa) and ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa) were used as standards for column calibration. The Kav versus log molecular weight was calculated using the equation Kav = (VeV0)/(VtV0), where Ve is the elution volume of the protein, V0 is the void volume of the column and Vt is the column bed volume.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SAXS Analysis of SFTSV L Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) of SFTSV L protein was performed with an in-line size exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 200 Increase 5/150 GL column (GE Healthcare) with a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES(NaOH) pH 7, 500 mM NaCl, 5% (w/v) glycerol and 2 mM dithiothreitol. Data was collected at the SAXS beamline P12 of PETRA III storage ring of the DESY, Hamburg, Germany (38 (link)) using a PILATUS 2M pixel detector at 3.0 m sample distance and 10 keV energy (λ = 1.24 Å), a momentum transfer range of 0.01 Å−1 < s < 0.45 Å−1 was covered (s = 4π sin θ/λ, where 2θ is the scattering angle). Data were analyzed using the ATSAS 2.8 package (39 (link)). The SEC-SAXS data were analyzed with CHROMIXS and the forward scattering I(0) and the radius of gyration Rg were extracted from the Guinier approximation calculated with the AutoRG function within PRIMUS (40 ). GNOM (41 ) provided the pair distribution function P(r) of the particle, the maximum size Dmax and the Porod volume. Ab initio reconstructions were generated with DAMMIF (42 (link)). Forty independent DAMMIF runs were compared and clustered into five main classes using DAMCLUST (43 (link),44 (link)). Models within each class were superimposed by SUPCOMB (45 ) and averaged using DAMAVER (46 ). The structures were visualized using UCSF Chimera (31 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Mass Analysis of YeaX and YeaW

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The native molecular mass of YeaX and YeaW was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 increase 5/150 GL column (GE Healthcare). Protein standards (molecular weight marker kit MWGF1000, Sigma) in the presence of 10 mM Hepes-NaOH, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 0.45 ml min−1 were used for calibration. Samples of 20 µl (∼300 µM) were injected and elution was monitored at 280 and 445 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SEC-MALS Analysis of RraA Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 Increase 5/150 GL column, GE healthcare) equipped with multi-angle light scattering (MALS) instrument (WYATT, USA) was employed. The protein samples were applied to the Superdex 200 column in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. VvRraA1, VvRraA1-C9D, VvRraA2, VvRraA2-C9D, and E. coli RraA were diluted to 3 mg/ml in the corresponding buffer and then loaded onto the column. Data analyses were performed with ASTRA 6 software (WYATT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Coupling H-Ras to Maleimide Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coupling to maleimide containing membranes was carried out as described previously (Siempelkamp et al., 2017 (link)). In brief, H-Ras constructs were added to 100 μL of 5 mg/mL PM-MCC vesicles (5% porcine brain phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, 10% maleimidomethyl phosphoethanolamine, 30% bovine brain phosphatidylserine, 40% egg yolk phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and 15% egg yolk phosphatidylcholine) at a molar ratio of 1.25 H-Ras per maleimide. The thiol-maleimide conjugation reaction was bubbled under nitrogen for 2 minutes and allowed to proceed at room temperature for 1 h, followed by incubation at 4 °C overnight. A vesicles-only control was treated identically to the H-Ras sample with the exception that buffer was added in place of H-Ras. Reactions were terminated via the addition of 5 mM βME. H-Ras-coupled and non-coupled vesicles were separated from soluble H-Ras by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex™ 200 Increase 5/150 GL column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in Ras gel filtration buffer. Both H-Ras-coupled and non-coupled vesicles were diluted to a final concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. The coupled H-Ras concentration was determined via intensity interpolation (ImageJ) of an SDS-PAGE standard curve using known soluble H-Ras concentrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Molecular Weight Determination of Active Enzyme

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the molecular weight of the active enzyme, we performed analytical size exclusion chromatography using a GE Superdex 200 Increase 5/150 GL column. The concentrated enzyme was manually loaded onto the column, and buffer E was run through the column at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. The molecular weight was determined using the Bio-Rad Gel Filtration Standards: thyroglobulin (670 kDa), γ globulin (158 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66 kDa, added to standards), ovalbumin (44 kDa), myoglobin (17 kDa), and Vitamin B12 (1750 Da).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying TLR8 Dimerization Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel filtration chromatography experiments were done in a buffer composed
of 25 mM MES-NaOH pH 5.5, 0.20 M NaCl, and 5% DMSO using Superdex 200
Increase 5/150 GL column (GE Healthcare). For the dose dependent dimerization of
TLR8, the samples (total volume 25 μl) containing 1 μM TLR8
with/without 0.5, 1, 2, 5 μM (R848 or CU-CPT9b) and 10
μM (R848 only) were injected. For the concentration dependent
dimerization of TLR8, the samples (total volume 50 μL) containing 0.025,
0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 7.5 nmol TLR8, 0.025, 0.5, 0.10, 0.15, 0.25, 0.50 nmol
TLR8 with R848 (TLR8 : R848 = 1 : 5), 0.015, 0.020, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1
nmol TLR8 with CU-CPT9b (TLR8 : CU-CPT9b = 1 :
5) were injected. Curve-fitting analysis was conducted using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optimizing Protein Complex Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For measuring the effect of various components in the buffer on the purified protein complex, the following procedure was used. Solutions of purified protein complex at concentrations ranging from 2–4 μM (concentration was identical for testing a given set of conditions) in a volume of 100 μl of SEC buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.28% NG, 100 nM NT1), adjusted to the specified conditions or supplemented with the specified components as described in Fig 4, were prepared. For testing the effect of GDP and GTPγS, the solutions were also supplemented with 0.1 mM MgCl2. The solutions were incubated at 4°C for a time-period ranging from overnight to seven days, depending on the conditions and as described in Fig 4. Prior to loading on the column, the mixtures were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4°C. The analytical SEC runs were performed on a Superdex 200 Increase 5/150 GL column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated in the same buffer. The elution profile was monitored by absorption at 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Stoichiometry of DM64-Myotoxin II Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stoichiometry of the interaction between DM64 and myotoxin II was analyzed by SEC, as described (Bastos et al., 2020 (link)), with modifications. A fixed amount of DM64 was titrated with increasing concentrations of myotoxin II (1:0.5; 1:1; 1:2; 1:4 mol/mol) in 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, containing 0.5 M NaCl. The mixtures were incubated at 25°C for 15 min and then injected on a Superdex 200 Increase 5/150 GL column (GE Healthcare), previously equilibrated with the same buffer. The chromatogram peaks were integrated, and the areas corresponding to free myotoxin or to free DM64 co-eluted with DM64-myotoxin complex were plotted. The experiment was run in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!