The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using ti e microscope

1

Immunofluorescence Imaging of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 VIM-RFP cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed with 4% formaldehyde, and blocked with 5% normal goat serum/0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 mins. Afterward, the primary antibodies were added to the blocking buffer, and cells were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were subsequently washed and incubated with the secondary antibodies for 1 hour and wrapped in aluminum foil. After washing, images were taken with a Nikon Ti-E microscope (Hamamatsu Flash 4.0V2). The primary antibodies were rabbit anti-vimentin (D21H3) (1:500 dilution; Cell Signaling Technologies, catalog no. 5741), mouse anti-N-cadherin (13A9) (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling Technologies, catalog no. 14215), and mouse anti-Snail (L70G2) (1:300 dilution; Cell Signaling Technologies, catalog no. 3895). For secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog no. A-21235) was used at a 1:1000 dilution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Size Estimation via Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To estimate cell sizes, strains containing a plasmid without promoter were selected from 4 different media with different size distributions (M9 + glucose, lactose or glycerol; MOPS + glucose. See Strains and growth conditions). Cells were then placed on a 1% agarose pad and phase contrast images were obtained with a Nikon Ti-E microscope using a 100 × Ph3 objective (NA 1.45) and an Hamamatsu Orca-Flash 4.0 v2 camera. Cell outlines were identified using a custom MATLAB pipeline [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Widefield Imaging with Nikon Ti-E Microscope

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All widefield imaging was performed on a Nikon Ti-E microscope equipped with a motorized stage, a Hamamatsu ORCA Flash 4.0 camera, an LED light source (Excelitas X-Cite XLED1), and a 60X CFI Plan Apo IR water immersion objective. All downstream image analysis was performed in ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Neural Precursors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lentivirus transduced, floating neural precursor aggregates were gently trypsinized to single cells and left to attach 1 h at 37 °C to poly-L-lysine (200 μg/ml) coated SuperFrost Plus microscope slides (Menzel-Glaser). Here they were fixed by 4% PFA for 20 min at 4 °C, washed three times in 1X PBS and processed for immunofluorescence. Fixed-cryopreserved brains were sliced at 16 μm, tissue slices were allowed to dry at least one hour at RT and processed for immunofluorescence.
In all cases, immunofluorescence was performed as previously described45 (link). The following primary antibodies were used: anti-Tubb3 (mouse clone Tuj1, Covance #MMS-435P, 1:1000); anti-GFP (chicken polyclonal, Abcam ab13970, 1:400); anti-Foxg1 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:20041 (link)). Secondary antibodies were conjugates of Alexa Fluor 488 and 594 (Invitrogen), used at 1:600. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (4′, 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole).
Tubb3 immunofluorescences were photographed on a Nikon Eclipse TS100 fluorescence microscope equipped with a DS-2MBWC digital microscope camera with a 20X objective. Immunoprofiled brain sections were photographed on a Nikon TI-E microscope, equipped with 20X or 40X objectives and a Hamamatsu C4742–95 camera. All images were processed using Adobe 9.0.2 Photoshop 2 CS2 software and ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopy Imaging of Dcp1/Dcp2 Phase Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopy images were collected on an inverted widefield fluorescence Nikon Ti-E microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu Flash4.0 camera using PlanApo 20x or 40x air objectives. Samples were imaged in a Greiner Bio-One 384-well glass bottom plate PEGylated using 20 mg/mL PEG-Silane (Laysan Bio, MPEG-SIL-5000) and passivated with 100 mg/mL BSA as described51 (link). Prior to addition of samples, the wells were washed 3x with 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT. Dcp1/Dcp2 constructs assayed for phase separation by microscopy were prepared by initiating removal of the N-terminal MBP solubility tag with 1:40 molar equivalent TEV:Dcp1/Dcp2. Dcp1/Dcp2/Edc3 droplets were prepared by incubating Dcp1/Dcp2 and Edc3 prior to removal of the N-terminal MBP tag from Dcp1/Dcp2ext. Imaging was performed after 30 minutes to ensure TEV cleavage and droplet. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ52 (link). For localization and enrichment of Dcp1/Dcp2ext, Edc3, or RNA in droplets, 1%–5% protein concentration was fluorescently labelled. Enrichment was estimated from the average ratio of intensity in at least twenty droplets (Idroplet) to average intensity in surrounding solution (Idilute).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Monitoring Peptidoglycan Synthesis in Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

d‐amino acids are involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis of diverse bacteria (Lam et al., 2009). HADA is a fluorescent d‐amino acid analogue that can be used for monitoring the peptidoglycan synthesis activity of bacteria (Kuru et al., 2015). Cells were grown in LB broth until OD600 reached 0.2. Relacidine B was added at a concentration of 0.25 μg ml−1 and cells were kept growing for another 2, 4, and 5 h. DMSO was used as a negative control while ceftriaxone (4 μg ml−1) was used as a positive control. At each time point, cells were treated with 500 μM HADA for 24 min. After treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS buffer. Incorporation of HADA was inspected with a Nikon Ti‐E microscope (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Time-lapse Imaging of Single-Cell Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Time-lapse images were taken with a Nikon Ti-E microscope (Hamamatsu Flash 4.0V2) with differential interference contrast (DIC) and tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) channels (excitation wavelength is 555 nm and emission wavelength is 587) (20× objective, numerical aperture = 0.75). The cell culture condition was maintained with the Tokai Hit Microscope Stage Top Incubator. Cells were imaged every 5 min with the DIC channel and every 10 min with the TRITC channel. The exposure time for DIC was 100 ms and that for the TRITC channel was 30 ms. That is, each full (2 days long) single-cell trajectory contains 577 DIC images and 289 fluorescent images. While taking the images, all the imaging fields were chosen randomly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microscopy Techniques for Cellular Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All microscopy, excluding the experiments for Figure 5, was performed at 30°C on a Delta Vision Deconvolution Microscope (Applied Precision), using InsightSSITM Solid State Illumination of 488 and 594 nm, an Olympus UPLS Apo 60x or 100x oil objective with 1.4NA and softWoRx software (GE lifesciences). Detection was done with a CoolSNAP HQ2 camera. Microscopy to study Msn2 dynamics was performed on a Nikon Ti-E microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca Flash V2 using a 40X oil immersion objective (1.3NA). Fluorescence excitation was performed using an LED illumination system (Excelitas 110-LED) that is triggered by the camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optogenetic Control of Stem Cell Fate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Full experimental procedures can be found in the Supplemental Information. Briefly: mESCs were cultured under standard conditions but maintained in the dark and passaged under red illumination. The Nanog-GFP knock-in cell line was generated from E14 mouse embryonic stem cells (gift from Chong Park) through Cas9 mediated homologous recombination of eGFP into the C terminus of the endogenous Nanog gene. Optogenetic induction of Brn2 in E14 mES cells was accomplished using the GAVPO blue-light activate-able transcription factor. Expression of Brn2 was induced by an addressable LED matrix, the illumination of each LED was controlled in space and time and isolated from the others by a custom 3D printed mask. All imaging experiments were performed with a Nikon Ti-E Microscope with Hamamatsu Flash 4.0 camera controlled by Nikon Elements software NIS-Elements 4.2. FACS and RNA-seq experiments were performed and analyzed using standard methods. The mathematical model is described in detail in the supporting information. Numerical integration of the model was performed using NDSolve in Mathematica.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscopy Imaging of Dcp1/Dcp2 Phase Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopy images were collected on an inverted widefield fluorescence Nikon Ti-E microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu Flash4.0 camera using PlanApo 20x or 40x air objectives. Samples were imaged in a Greiner Bio-One 384-well glass bottom plate PEGylated using 20 mg/mL PEG-Silane (Laysan Bio, MPEG-SIL-5000) and passivated with 100 mg/mL BSA as described51 (link). Prior to addition of samples, the wells were washed 3x with 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT. Dcp1/Dcp2 constructs assayed for phase separation by microscopy were prepared by initiating removal of the N-terminal MBP solubility tag with 1:40 molar equivalent TEV:Dcp1/Dcp2. Dcp1/Dcp2/Edc3 droplets were prepared by incubating Dcp1/Dcp2 and Edc3 prior to removal of the N-terminal MBP tag from Dcp1/Dcp2ext. Imaging was performed after 30 minutes to ensure TEV cleavage and droplet. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ52 (link). For localization and enrichment of Dcp1/Dcp2ext, Edc3, or RNA in droplets, 1%–5% protein concentration was fluorescently labelled. Enrichment was estimated from the average ratio of intensity in at least twenty droplets (Idroplet) to average intensity in surrounding solution (Idilute).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!