The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using pegrx 2

1

Crystallization and Structure Determination of Pyrophosphatase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hampton Research packs (PEGRx1, PEGRx2, Index, Crystal Screen, and Crystal Screen 2) were used for the initial crystallization screen (sitting-drop vapor diffusion method). To obtain a crystal suitable for X-ray diffraction, we optimized crystallization by using the initial three conditions. Larger crystals were obtained from drops that contained 1 μL protein and 1 μL solution from the well containing 2.2 M DL-malic acid, pH 6.5, with or without 5 mM PPi (hanging-drop method). The crystallization conditions of the mutants are similar to the wild-type. Prior to X-ray data collection, crystals were soaked for approximately 1 min in the reservoir solution supplemented with 20% (v/v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant, and then flash cooled in liquid nitrogen.
Data sets were collected at 100 K at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Shanghai, China). Data sets were indexed and integrated using XDS [55 (link)] and scaled using Aimless from the CCP4 package [56 (link)]. Structures were determined by Phaser [57 (link)] with a molecular replacement method using the structure of PPase (PDB: 1i6t) as the search model. Structure refinement and water updating were performed using Phenix refine [58 (link)] and Coot [59 (link)] manual adjustment. The final structure validations were performed using MolProbity [60 (link)]. Figures for all structures were generated using PyMOL [61 ] or Coot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cryo-EM and Protein Crystallography Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryo-EM samples were prepared on Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 mesh 200 Cu grids, Quantifoil R2/1 mesh 200 Cu grids (Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH, Großlöbichau, Germany), and C-flat-2/1 mesh 200 Cu grids (Protochips, Morrisville, NC, USA) using Q150T ES glow discharge system (Quorum Technologies, East Sussex, England) and Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Protein crystals were produced using the following crystallization kits: Crystal Screen (Hampton Research, HR2-110), PEGRx 2 (Hampton Research, HR2-084) and crystallization robots: Phoenix (Art Robbins Instruments, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), Oryx (Douglas Instruments, Hungerford, UK). For biochemical experiments the following fluorescently labeled deoxynucleotides were used: Fluorescein-dUTP (Thermo Scientifc, R0101), Texas Red-dCTP (Jena Bioscience, NU-809-TXR-S). The results of activity assays were visualized by fluorescence readout using Amersham Typhoon (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) biomolecular imager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimized Crystallization Screening of N-PAS Domain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystallization screening of the N-PAS domain was performed using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method. Up to 14 different series of screening solutions were prepared, including Index, Index 2, Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2, PEG/Ion, PEG/Ion 2, SaltRx, SaltRx 2, PEGRx and PEGRx 2 (Hampton Research, California, USA) as well as Wizard I and II (Emerald Bio). For crystallization, 1 µl protein solution (20 mg ml−1 N-PAS domain, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT) was mixed with 1 µl precipitant solution (Table 1). Different combinations of precipitant, pH and salt were tested and several optimization screens were used, including Detergent Screen, Additive Screen and Silver Bullets (Hampton Research). After optimization, crystals for data collection were obtained at 291 K. The crystals were recovered and immediately flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen.
Data were collected from a single flash-cooled crystal, which was a long rod, using 25%(v/v) glycerol as a cryo­protectant on beamline BL17U at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF; Table 2). The data were processed, integrated and scaled using HKL-2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▸ ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Crystallization of CrPRX1 Enzyme Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystallization conditions for CrPRX1 were screened by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method using Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2, PEG Rx 1, PEG Rx 2 (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, California, USA) and Wizard I, II, III and IV (Rigaku, Bainbridge Island, Washington, USA) at 277 and 293 K. Needle crystals of wild-type CrPRX1 were produced using 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M sodium citrate pH 5.5, 24% PEG 400. After optimization including a microseeding technique, crystals with a suitable size for an X-ray experiment were obtained from droplets comprised of 1 µl of 30 mg ml−1 protein sample and 1 µl reservoir solution consisting of 0.05 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M sodium citrate pH 5.5, 20% PEG 400, 15% glycerol (Fig. 2a). Unexpectedly, the crystallization conditions for the C2S mutant of CrPRX1 differed markedly from those for the wild type. After optimization of the crystallization conditions, rhombic crystals of the C2S mutant were obtained from droplets comprised of 2 µl of 15 mg ml−1 protein sample and 1 µl reservoir solution consisting of 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.6, 0.2 M sodium thiocyanate, 20% PEG 3350 (Fig. 2b). Crystallization information is summarized in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Crystallization of Enzyme CcXyDHT via Vapor Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystallization of the purified enzymes was performed by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method in a 24-well cell-culture plate (Greiner Bio-One, Germany) at 293 K. The following commercial crystallization kits were used: Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen 2, PEG/Ion, SaltRx 1, SaltRx 2, Index HT, PEGRx 1 and PEGRx 2 (Hampton Research). Droplets were prepared by mixing protein sample and crystallization reagent in a 1:1 ratio on a siliconized glass cover slide. The cover slides were then turned drop-side down against 500 µl crystallization reservoir reagent and sealed with grease to ensure that they were airtight. The plates were stored at 293 K. A microseeding technique (Bergfors, 2003 ▸ ) was applied to improve the quality of the CcXyDHT crystals. An initial condition that consisted of 3.6 M sodium formate, 5% PEG 3350 gave clusters of CcXyDHT crystals. A small cluster of crystals was removed in 4 µl crystallization reagent on a glass cover slide, crushed with a micro needle, diluted with 46 µl crystallization reagent to a final volume of 50 µl and sonicated for 3 min in a sonication bath (FinnSonic, Finland). A dog hair was dipped into the seed-stock solution and streaked through pre-equilibrated crystallization drops. Crystallization information is shown in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!