The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using 0.1 m sodium cacodylate

1

Histological Tissue Preparation and Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following perfusion, the tissue specimens were post-fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde and 12.5% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich), and buffered in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.4; Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature for 4 h. Following rinses in 13 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3), the tissue specimens were decalcified in 4.13% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (pH 7.2; Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA) for 30 days, dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (5 mm) were obtained using the Leica RM2255 microtome (Leica Microsystems GmbH) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; Abbey Color, Philadelphia, PA, USA) for 15 and 5 min, respectively, at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gimenez and Diff-Quick Staining of Infected Cells for Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infected cells were cytocentrifuged for staining with Gimenez and Diff-Quick (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) and were then examined under light microscope Leica® DM LB2.
For the electron microscopy, 200 µL of 11 old days PL13-S2 co-culture were centrifuged for 15 min at 3000 rpm, then the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) for 1 h. After fixation, the pellet was rinsed three times with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (5 min each) to remove residual fixative. The graded ethanol concentrations (25% for 5 min; 50% for 5 min; 70% for 5 min; 85% for 5 min; 95% for 5 min (twice); 100% ethanol for 10 min (three times) was used for sample dehydration. Finally, the pellet was incubated for 5 min in an ethanol/Hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) (1:2) mixture, then in pure HMDS. The mixture was cytocentrifuged for 5 min at 2000 rpm and the glass slide allowed to air dry for 30 min before observation. The examination was performed using a TM4000 PlusTM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) scanning electron microscope operated at 10 kV in BSE mode at magnifications ranging from X200 to X3000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electron Microscopy Cell Fixation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in Karnovsky fixative (2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% Glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 mins, and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (Sigma-Aldrich) buffer pH 7.4. Fixed cells were dehydrated in increasing concentrations (70–100%) of ethanol and acetone, and then embedded in BEEM resin capsules and polymerized overnight at 70°C. Ultrathin sections were cut at 80-100 nm and mounted on 300 mesh copper grids, stained with lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA), and observed using an FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR) operating at 80 KV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electron Microscopy Cell Fixation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in Karnovsky fixative (2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% Glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 mins, and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (Sigma-Aldrich) buffer pH 7.4. Fixed cells were dehydrated in increasing concentrations (70–100%) of ethanol and acetone, and then embedded in BEEM resin capsules and polymerized overnight at 70°C. Ultrathin sections were cut at 80-100 nm and mounted on 300 mesh copper grids, stained with lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA), and observed using an FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR) operating at 80 KV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electron Microscopy of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, large and small EV pellets purified as described above were suspended with glutaraldehyde 2.5% (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 0.1-M sodium cacodylate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) buffer, pH 7.4. Ten microliters of the EV sample were pipetted onto a nickel grid with carbon-coated formvar film and incubated for 10 min. Excess liquid was removed by blotting. The grids were stained for 2 min with 2% uranyl acetate solution. Images were acquired using a FEI Tecnai Spirit G2 (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) transmission electron microscope equipped with a bottom-mounted CCD camera at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cancer Cell Nanotubes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (Sigma), 2% gluteraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences), 3% PFA (Electron Microscopy Sciences), 5% sucrose buffer (Sigma) and 1% osmium tetroxide (pH 7.4) (Electron Microscopy Sciences). The samples were then dried in increasing concentrations of high-grade ethanol, followed by critical point drying using Autosamdri 815 critical point dryer and sputter coated using Cressington 208HR sputter coating with Au or Pt/Pd. Imaging was done on a Jeol 5600LV SEM, Zeiss EVO SEM or Zeiss FESEM Ultra55 microscope. For each image the total number of cancer cells, cancer cells with nanotubes, cancer cells without nanotubes, total number of nanotubes, total number of EPI–EPI membrane nanobridges, EPI–ENDO nanobridges, number of cells forming EPI–EPI nanobridges, EPI–ENDO nanobridges and number of cells positive for both EPI–EPI and EPI–ENDO nanobridges were counted. Length and width of the nanobridges were measured using the CarlZeiss TIF annotation editor. Width was measured at three different positions across the length of the nanobridges and the average width was calculated for the comparison of length and width of the nanobridges.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!