The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Model xl30

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in United States, Netherlands

The Philips Model XL30 is a laboratory equipment designed for scientific analysis and research. It provides core functionality for conducting detailed examinations and measurements in a controlled environment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using model xl30

1

Thermal, Structural, and Magnetic Characterization of Glass-Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal
behavior of the as-prepared samples was investigated using DSC analysis.
The DSC traces were collected using a STD Q600 instrument (TA Instruments
Company) at a 10 °C/min heating rate under nitrogen atmosphere
(30 mL/min). α-Al2O3 was used as the reference
material in this analysis. Crystalline phases developed in the glass-ceramic
samples were identified from the XRD patterns obtained by an Empyrean
XRD diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical Company). The XRD analysis
was performed using Cu Kα (1.54060 Å) radiation in the
2θ range of 10–70° with 0.0260 step size and 18.87
s scan step time. The microstructure was examined for the intact specimen
and for samples etched for 150 s in aqueous solution containing 0.2%
HF and 0.2% HNO3. A field emission scanning electron microscope
FE-SEM (Philips XL30 model) was used for this purpose. Magnetic properties
were assessed by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Riken Denshi
BH-55) at room temperature. UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
(DRS) was used to study the optical properties. DRS spectra, within
the range of 200–1000 nm, were recorded by a JASCO spectrophotometer
(model V570, Japan) using BaSO4 as the reference material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Hydrogel Scaffold Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the hydrogels and the pore sizes were studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, XL30 model, Philips). Briefly, dried scaffold samples were cut into little segments sputter-coated with gold to a width of 200–500 Å and placed on a metal stub for observation under SEM. Examination of the SEM images for estimating the pore size and porosity percentage of the scaffolds was carried out using ImageJ® software. The values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanofiber Characterization by SEM and TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanofibers obtained on the aluminum foil mounted on the rotating drum were used for further analysis. Foil (3 mm × 3 mm pieces) was cut and coated with gold (sputter coater Bal-Tech, 005 SCD, USA). The pieces were sandwiched with carbon adhesive on a sample holder using a scanning electron microscope (Philips XL30 model, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 25 kV. Microstructure Measurement Software was used to measure the diameters of 20 nanofibers of each SEM image. The obtained information was entered into the 2010 Microsoft Office Excel and Origin program to draw the distribution diagram of nanofibers. An optical microscopy image of solution was obtained by an Optical microscope (Labomed Lx500, USA). The homogeneity of the structure was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, EM10C, Zeiss). The samples for TEM observation were prepared in the following manner. First, nanofibers were collected on a glass slide ensuring that fibers were fluffily placed on the glass slide instead of winding firmly. Second, the carbon-coated copper grids were gently held with delicate tweezers on the collector to directly obtain a thin layer of fibers while rubbing back and forth on it.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanofiber Morphology and Wettability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological characteristics of nanofibers are investigated via scanning electron microscopy (SEM, XL30 model, Philips) at voltage of 20 KV. The hydrophilicity of surfaces is also characterized using drop shape analyzer. Photographs of distilled water drop are taken by camera (AM-4113ZT4, DinoLite), and, water contact angles are analyzed using DinoCaoture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of PPM5/TiO2 Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD, Unisantis xmd300, Georgesmarienhutte, Germany) measurements were recorded in 2θ in the range of 5–60°. The surface morphologies of PP and PPM5 deposited TiO2 nanoparticles (PPM5/TiO2) were examined by SEM (Philips, model XL30). Change of functional groups and influence nanoparticles deposition on the surface were studied using FT-IR-ATR (Bruker Alpha, Yokohama, Japan). Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was accomplished by using a heating rate of 10 °C/min from 30 °C to 800 °C under air flow radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was recorded via an Al Kα X-ray source at 1486.6 eV. Finally, the alteration in wettability was examined using the WCA measuring system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Enamel Detachment Analysis of Orthodontic Brackets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For further investigation, the surface of all the brackets also was examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Philips, Netherlands, Model XL30), and an analysis system was installed on the device for qualitative measurement of enamel detachment and failure location. EDX analysis determined enamel detachment and site of bonding failure following de-bonding to a depth of 1.5 μm in the bracket surface through measuring iron for metallic brackets, aluminum for ceramic brackets, silicon for adhesive resin, and phosphorus and calcium for the enamel (20 (link)). The enamel detachment index (EDI) was used to quantify detached enamel existing on the bracket bases after de-bonding: it consists of no enamel detachment(zero); less than 10% of enamel detachment (one); more than 10% but less than 30% of enamel detachment(two). The average depth of X-ray infiltration was 1.5 m.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Blend Morphologies via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of blends were analyzed using a Philips Model XL30 scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The samples were first cut at −120 °C using rotation microtom (Mikrom HM360). Consequently, the fractured surfaces were etched with n-heptane at 80 °C for 5 h and then sputtered with gold layer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrochemical Characterization of RuO2-TiO2@Ti Composite Membrane

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface morphologies of RuO2-TiO2@Ti electrode and the composite membrane were analyzed by scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM/EDS) (Model XL-30, Philips, Netherland). Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans were carried out using the neutral electrolyte solution containing 1 mM PIPES and 15 mM Na2SO4 (in some cases, 50 μM SA was added) in a three-electrode cell driven by an electrochemical workstation (CS350, Corrtest Co., China), to characterize the electrochemical properties of the developed RuO2-TiO2@Ti/PVDF composite membrane and clarify the relevant anodic oxidation mechanism of this membrane, respectively. An Ag/AgCl and a Pt wire served as the reference electrode and the counter electrode, respectively. In particular, in LSV tests, RuO2-TiO2@Ti electrode and pristine PVDF membrane were used as the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Fibrous Biomaterial Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fabricated fibrous mats were gold coated by sputtering and examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Philips Model XL30, Eindhoven, The Netherland) at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. The mean diameter of the fibers was analyzed by measuring the diameter of 50 random fibers from FESEM images. An image analysis software (Image J, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was utilized to determine the fiber size distribution. A JEOL transmission electron microscope (TEM, Zeiss, EM10C, Berlin, Germany) was used at 100 kV voltage to analyze the core-shell structure.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (AVATAR, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) of the mats was performed in transmission mode using KBr pellets in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1. Mechanical properties of the scaffolds were assessed by a universal tensile testing machine (AG-5000G, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) according to ASTM D638 at a strain rate of 5 mm/min and 2 cm gauge length. Water contact-angle goniometry (OCA 15 Plus, Dataphysics, Filderstadt, Germany) was employed to evaluate the wettability of the fibrous membranes. Triplicate samples (n ≥ 3) were examined and the average values were reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscope Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

A Philips Model XL30 scanning electron microscope (Philips, The Netherlands) was used to obtain the SEM images. The samples were glued onto aluminum stages using double adhesive carbon conducting tape and coated with gold–palladium at room temperature before the examination. The accelerator voltage for scanning was 25.0 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!