The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Laser puller

Manufactured by Sutter Instruments
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Laser Puller is a laboratory instrument used to create micropipettes and other fine-tipped glass filaments. It utilizes a focused laser beam to heat and pull glass capillary tubes, allowing precise control over the resulting diameter and taper of the pulled tip.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using laser puller

1

Ultra-high Pressure Capillary Column Packing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A laser puller (Sutter Instruments Co., Novato, CA) was used to generate electrospray emitter tips (~10 × 25 μm inner-outer diameter) on 75 ID × 360 μm OD bare-fused silica capillary columns (Polymicro Phoenix, AZ). The tips were briefly etched with 100% hydrofluoric acid and plugged with 5 μm, 130 Å pore size Bridged Ethylene Hybrid (BEH) C18 particles (Waters, Milford, MA) using an in-house made pressure injection cell with maximum gas pressure rating of ~1500 psi. Then, the column was packed with 1.7 μm diameter, 130 Å pore size BEH C18 particles (Waters, Milford, MA) using the ultra-high pressure (uHP) column packing station, reaching a maximum pressure of ~20,000 to ~30,000 psi.16 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fabrication of Ultrahigh-Pressure Packed Columns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A laser puller (Sutter Instruments Co., Novato, CA) was used to generate 75 × 360 μm inner–outer diameter bare-fused silica capillary columns with electrospray emitter tips (~10 × 25 μm inner–outer diameter). The tips were briefly etched with 100% hydrofluoric acid and plugged with 5 μm, 130 Å pore size Bridged Ethylene Hybrid (BEH) C18 particles (Waters, Milford, MA) using an in-house made pressure injection cell with maximum gas pressure grading of ~1500 psi. Then, using the same packing unit, three columns were filled with 1.7 μm diameter, 130 Å pore size BEH particles (Waters, Milford, MA). Two additional sets of three columns were packed with 1.7 μm diameter particles at the uHP column packing station, reaching maximum pressure of ~20,000 and ~30,000 psi. In all cases, 1.7 μm packing material was resuspended in chloroform at unspecified concentrations of 40–160 mg/mL, as varying slurry concentration across this range did not detectably impact the number of identified unique peptides (data not shown). On average, packing a column at 20,000 or 30,000 psi using the uHP station took ~2 h, in contrast to 3–7 h required to pack a column using the pressure injection cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Peptide Analysis by HPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were analyzed using an HPLC-ESI-MS/MS system consisting of a high performance liquid chromatograph (nanoAcquity, Waters) set in line with an electrospray ionization (ESI) Orbitrap mass spectrometer (QE HF, ThermoFisher Scientific). A 100 μm id × 365 μm od fused silica capillary microcolumn packed with 20 cm of 1.7 μm diameter, 130 Å pore size, C18 beads (Waters BEH), and an emitter tip pulled to approximately 1 μm using a laser puller (Sutter Instruments) was used for HPLC separation of peptides. Peptides were loaded on-column with 2% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nL/min for 30 min. Peptides were then eluted at a flow-rate of 400 nL/min over 120 min with a gradient from 5% to 35% acetonitrile, in 0.1% formic acid. Full-mass profile scans (375−1500 m/z) were performed in the FT orbitrap at a resolution of 120,000 followed by 20 MS/MS HCD scans of the 20 highest intensity parent ions at 30% relative collision energy and 15,000 resolution with a mass range starting at 100 m/z. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with a repeat count of one over a duration of 30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-Resolution Protein Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS using a system consisting of a high-performance liquid chromatograph (nanoAcquity, Waters) connected to an electrospray ionization (ESI) Orbitrap mass spectrometer (LTQ Velos, Thermo Fisher Scientific). HPLC separation employed a 100×365 mm fused silica capillary micro-column packed with 20 cm of 1.7-µm-diameter, 130 Å pore size, C18 beads (Waters BEH), with an emitter tip pulled to approximately 1 µm using a laser puller (Sutter Instruments). Peptides were loaded on-column at a flow rate of 400 nL/min for 30 min and then eluted over 120 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min with a gradient of 2–30% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. Full-mass profile scans were performed in the orbitrap between 300 and 1500 m/z at a resolution of 60,000, followed by 10 MS/MS HCD scans of the 10 highest intensity parent ions at 42% relative collision energy and 7500 resolution, with a mass range starting at 100 m/z. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with a repeat count of two over the duration of 30 s and an exclusion window of 120 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-ESI-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples (∼2 μg protein each injection) were analyzed via HPLC (NanoAcquity, Waters)-ESI−MS/MS (Q Exactive HF, ThermoFisher Scientific). The HPLC separation employed a 15 cm × 365 μm fused silica capillary microcolumn packed with 3 μm diameter, 100 Å pore size C18 beads (Magic C18; Bruker), with an emitter tip pulled to ∼2 μm using a laser puller (Sutter Instruments). Peptides were loaded on-column at a flow-rate of 400 nL/min for 30 min, then eluted over 120 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min with a gradient from 5 to 35% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. The gradient was then ramped to 70% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid over 5 min and held for 5 min, then reduced to 2% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid over 5 min and held for 15 min. Full-mass profile scans were performed in the Orbitrap between 375 and 1500 m/z at a resolution of 120 000, followed by MS/MS HCD (higher energy collisional dissociation) scans of the 10 highest intensity parent ions with z > 2 at 30 CE (relative collision energy) and 15 000 resolution, with a mass range starting at 100 m/z. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with an exclusion window of 30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Resolution Proteomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS using a system consisting of a highperformance liquid chromatograph (nanoAcquity, Waters) connected to an electrospray ionization (ESI) Orbitrap mass spectrometer (LTQ Velos, ThermoFisher Scientific). HPLC separation employed a 100 x 365 mm fused silica capillary micro-column packed with 20 cm of 1.7µm-diameter, 130 Angstrom pore size, C18 beads (Waters BEH), with an emitter tip pulled to approximately 1 µm using a laser puller (Sutter Instruments). Peptides were loaded oncolumn at a flow-rate of 400nL/min for 30 minutes and then eluted over 120 min at a flow-rate of 300 nl/minute with a gradient of 2-30% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid. Full-mass profile scans were performed in the orbitrap between 300-1500 m/z at a resolution of 60,000, followed by ten MS/MS HCD scans of the ten highest intensity parent ions at 42% relative collision energy and 7,500 resolution, with a mass range starting at 100 m/z. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with a repeat count of two over the duration of 30 seconds and an exclusion window of 120 seconds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Peptide Purification and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were eluted from StageTips using 40% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA and dried to completion using vacuum centrifugation. Peptides were resuspended in 0.1% TFA and separated on a Thermo-Dionex RSLCNano UHPLC instrument with a 10-cm long fused silica capillary columns made in-house with a laser puller (Sutter) and packed with 3 μm 120 Å reverse phase C18 beads (Dr. Maisch). The LC gradient was 90 min long with 4-32% B at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. LC solvent A was 0.1% acetic acid and solvent B was 0.1% acetic acid, 80% acetonitrile. MS data was collected with a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer. Data-dependent analysis was applied using Top10 selection with HCD fragmentation with a normalized collision energy of 25%. Orbitrap MS spectra and MS/MS spectra were acquired at a resolution of 60000 and 30000, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were separated on a Thermo-Dionex RSLCNano UHPLC instrument with ~10 cm x 75 micron ID fused silica capillary columns with ~10 micron tip opening made in-house with a laser puller (Sutter) and packed with 3 micron reversed phase C18 beads (Reprosil-C18.aq, 120 Angstroms, Dr. Maisch). We applied a 90 min gradient of 10–35% B at 200 nL/min using 0.1% acetic acid as solvent A and solvent B of 0.1% acetic acid, 99.9% acetonitrile. MS data was collected with a Thermo Orbitrap Elite. Data-dependent analysis was applied using Top 5 selection and fragmentation was induced by CID and HCD. Profile mode data was collected in all scans. MS analysis parameters were as previously described5 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole-cell Patch Clamp Electrophysiology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All whole-cell recordings were performed using patch electrodes made from filamented borosilicate glass capillaries (Harvard Apparatus, UK) using a laser puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA), with resistances of 8–11 MΩ, and were visually aided by IR-DIC microscopy (Optizoom, Nikon, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!