The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cyflow ploidy analyzer

Manufactured by Sysmex
Sourced in Japan, Germany

The CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer is a flow cytometry-based instrument designed to analyze the DNA content of cells. It measures the fluorescence intensity of DNA-specific dyes to determine the ploidy status of a sample, providing information about the cell cycle and genome composition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using cyflow ploidy analyzer

1

Ploidy Analysis of Plant Accessions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ploidy level of the 55 accessions (each analyzed in three biological replicates) was studied through flow cytometry (CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer) of 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained nuclei following the procedure described by the CyStain UV Precise P protocol (Sysmex Partec). One hundred milligrams of fresh leaf tissue taken from each of the three biological replicates were co-chopped with a razor blade in a Petri dish with 0.5 ml of Nuclei Extraction Buffer (Sysmex Partec) and incubated for 45 min at room temperature. After filtering (30 μm of CellTrics®, Sysmex Partec), 2 ml of staining buffer was added to each sample and incubated for 60 s before analysis (Nd-YAG green laser: λ = 532 nm; 30 mW, flow rate of 4 μl/s). Fluorescence histograms were evaluated using FCS Express 5 Flow software (Sysmex Partec), and ploidy levels were inferred by comparing each sample with the ploidy level of the 2001 sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ploidy Analysis of Plant Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ploidy analysis, whole leaves from plants at 8–20 DAS were used. Nuclei were isolated by chopping whole leaves with razor blade in Nuclei extraction buffer of CyStain UV precise P kit (Sysmex), filtered through 30 μm mesh, and stained with DAPI by adding Staining buffer of CyStain UV precise P kit. After incubation for 10 min, samples were analyzed with CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer (Sysmex) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For estimating population of nuclei in each peak, baselines of ploidy distribution profiles were calculated using the polynomial trendline function of Microsoft Excel. The value of baseline at each position was subtracted from the corresponding value of raw data for calculating the total count in each peak.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome Size Measurement of Asplenium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genome sizes of Asplenium sp. and A. tenuicaule were measured using a CyFlow® Ploidy Analyzer (Sysmex-Partec, Munster, Germany). Tetraploid Solanum tuberosum L., 1C = 1.82 pg [51 (link)], was used as the internal standard. Young fresh leaf tissues of the two Asplenium species and S. tuberosum were collected from living samples. They were washed using distilled water and chopped with razor blades in 500 μL of CyStain UV Precise P nuclei isolation buffer (Sysmex-Partec). After 10 min of incubation on ice, the suspension was then filtered through a nonsterile CellTrics® 30 μm filter and stained using 2 mL of UV Precise P staining buffer (Sysmex-Partec) containing DAPI. The stained suspension was loaded onto a flow cytometer, and the genome size was measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Generating Tetraploid Arabidopsis Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The A. thaliana mutant and reporter lines used were described previously: wei8-1/− tar1/− tar2-1/+ and wei8-1/− tar1/- tar2-2/+ (Stepanova et al. 2008 (link)), axr1-12/+ (Dharmasiri et al. 2007 (link)), osd1-1 (d'Erfurth et al. 2009 (link)), osd1-3 (Heyman et al. 2011 (link)), and klu-4 (Adamski et al. 2009 (link)).
Seeds were sterilized in 5% commercial bleach and 0.01% Tween-20 for 10 min and washed three times in sterile ddH2O. Sterile seeds were plated on one-half MS-medium (0.43% MS-salts, 0.8% Bacto agar, 0.19% MES hydrate, and 1% sucrose; when necessary, the medium was supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics) and stratified in the dark for 48 h at 4°C. Plates were then transferred to a growth chamber (16 h light/8 h dark; 110 µmol/s/m2; 21°C; 70% humidity). After 10-d seedlings were transferred to soil and grown in a growth chamber (16 h light/8 h dark; 110 µmol/s/m2; 21°C; 70% humidity).
Tetraploid plants were generated by treating 2-wk-old seedlings with 7 µL of 0.25% colchicine. Treated plants were grown to maturity and scored for alterations in pollen size. Seeds of plants showing enlarged pollen grains were collected, and the ploidy of the subsequent generation was determined in a Cyflow ploidy analyzer, using the Cystain UV precise P kit (Sysmex).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Resynthesizing Allopolyploid Brassica Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four lines from the genus Brassica were used, including a red-green Chinese cabbage line (B. rapa cv. Asia), a red cabbage line (B. oleracea cv. Rubea), a green resynthesized rapeseed line (allopolyploid B. napus cv. Rs306), and a red resynthesized rapeseed line (allopolyploid B. napus cv. Rs035). The Rs035 line was developed by crossing the inbred Chinese cabbage line B. rapa cv. Asia with the cabbage line B. oleracea cv. Rubea. The embryos were rescued 18–20 days after crossing and were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium. The chromosomes of the developed plants were diploidized using a 4-hr 0.1% colchicine root treatment. Successfully crossed hybrid plants were identified using the conserved ortholog set (COS) marker COS1078 [73 (link)]. The genotypes of the allopolyploid plants with diploid chromosomes were confirmed using a CyFlow ploidy analyzer and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution (Sysmex, Norderstedt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Molecular Identification of Loquat Hybrids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The F1 hybrids were identified by hybrid identification, ploidy identification, and flesh color-specific marker analysis; the segregation ratios of red-fleshed and white-fleshed loquats were calculated; and the inheritance of tetraploid flesh color was explored. SSR markers were used to identify true and false hybrids. The SSR markers were derived from loquat genome data (Additional file 4: Table S2). For each cross combination, three SSR markers on different chromosomes were used. When two or more male parent-specific bands appeared in the F1 hybrids, they were considered to be true hybrids. The PCR amplification and electrophoresis of SSRs were run according to the literature with slight modifications [42 , 81 (link)].
The ploidy of hybrids was identified by flow cytometry [82 (link)]. Fresh young plant tissue (1 g) was placed in a culture dish, and 1 ml of nuclear extract was added after chopping. The liquid was filtered into a 2 mL centrifuge tube through a 30 μm filter membrane and centrifuged at 1000 r/min for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, 500 μL of cell nucleus extract was added to prepare a cell nucleus suspension, 50 μL of DAPI (5 μg/mL) was added, and the cells were stained for 3–4 min in the dark and then tested on a CyFlow® Ploidy Analyzer (Sysmex-Partec GmbH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Salix DNA Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analyses were performed on leaves of in vitro regenerated plants. Samples were prepared as previously described [24 (link)] using Galbraith’s nuclear isolation buffer [40 (link)] supplemented with 2% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-10), propidium iodide (PI; 50 μg/mL), and ribonuclease A (50 μg/mL). Solanum lycopersicum cv. Stupicke (2C = 1.96 pg/2C) [41 (link)] was used as an internal standard. For each sample, PI fluorescence was measured in at least 5000 nuclei, using a CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer flow cytometer (Sysmex Partec, Kobe, Japan). Histograms were analyzed using CyView 1.6 software. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the G0/G1 peak of Salix ranged from 3.16% to 6.68%. Nuclear DNA content was calculated based on the linear relationship between the ratios of the 2C peak positions of Salix/Solanum on a histogram of fluorescence intensities. Genome size was estimated for five control plants (leaves collected in the natural habitat) and 350 in vitro-derived plants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome Size Measurement of Arabis mucosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Young leaves of 15 A. mucosa individuals were collected and used for genome size measurements by flow cytometry. Approximately 1 cm2 of young leaf tissue was minced with fresh leaf material from an internal standard (Petroselinum crispum (Mill.), Apiaceae, 2C = 4.50 pg). Nuclear suspensions were prepared according to Doležel, Greilhuber & Suda (2007) (link), adding 1.5 mL of WPB (woody plant buffer) (Loureiro et al., 2007 (link)) to the nucleus extract, and then the nuclear suspension was filtered through a 30 μm nylon mesh. The nuclear suspension was stained with 50 μL of 1 mg/mL propidium iodide, incubated for at least 10 min and analyzed by flow cytometry. At least 5,000 nuclei from three replicates were analyzed for each sample using a CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) cytometer. Each set of histograms from the flow cytometry analyses was analyzed using Flowing Software v2.5.1 by Perttu Terho (Turku Center for Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ploidy Level Analysis of Sorghum Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the ploidy levels of S. bicolor and S. kaptarae, flow cytometry (FC) was conducted using silica-gel-dried leaf material. Samples (~1 cm2) were reduced to small pieces using Tissue Lyzer II (Qiagen; 30 Hz, time 3 s). A total of 200 µL of 1% PVP Otto I extraction buffer were added, and samples were gently inverted for 1 min. Samples were filtered through CellTrics ® filter (30 µm mesh, Sysmex Partec GmbH, Görlitz, Germany) into a flow cytometry sample tube. A total of 800 µL of DAPI-containing Otto II buffer [81 ] were then added to strain the DNA. FC analyses were carried out on a CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer (Sysmex, Norderstedt, Germany) and the Software CUBE16 v.1.6 (Sysmex, Norderstedt, Germany) was used to analyze the results and compute DNA content. Gain was set at 530 nm for an optimal differentiation between DNA content. Three different diploid S. caprea samples were used as external standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ploidy Level Analysis in Walnut Progenies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ploidy level was evaluated by flow cytometry analysis of stained nuclei by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), isolated from leaves of 40 walnut progenies in the laboratory of Genomics for Plant Breeding, DAFNAE, University of Padova, Italy. In brief, 35 progenies that -based on SSR data- were predicted to be the result of outcrossing were analyzed to identify any possible polyploid BIII hybrid. Similarly, 5 progenies that -based on SSR data - were predicted to be the result of selfing were analyzed to identify any possible parthenogenesis-derived haploid accession through flow cytometry (CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer, Sysmex, DE). Following the procedure outlined in the CyStain UV Precise protocol, Approximately, 0.5 cm2 of young fresh leaves were chopped with 0.5 ml of Nuclei Extraction Buffer (Sysmex Partec) and incubated for 2 minutes at room temperature. Then, each sample was filtered (30 µm CellTrics®, Sysmex) and incubated in 2 ml of staining buffer for 60 sec before analysis (blue fluorescence emission= 435-500 nm; flow rate of 4 µl/sec). Fluorescence histograms were evaluated using Flowing software 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!