The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Allegra 64r centrifuge

Manufactured by Beckman Coulter
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom

The Allegra 64R Centrifuge is a high-performance, refrigerated benchtop centrifuge designed for a wide range of laboratory applications. It is capable of reaching a maximum speed of 17,500 rpm and can accommodate various rotor configurations to support different sample volumes and tube sizes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

40 protocols using allegra 64r centrifuge

1

Optimization of Drug-Loaded Nanoemulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To promote drug entrapment within the oily droplets of the nanoemulsions, the selected drugs (doxorubicin, irinotecan, cisplatin) underwent HIP formation with AOT, following literature methods. Briefly, doxorubicin hydrochloride and irinotecan hydrochloride were separately dissolved in distilled water, at 10 and 4 mg/mL, respectively. Their corresponding HIPs were precipitated via the addition of an AOT solution (4.5 mg/mL) in a 1:1 molar ratio, followed by centrifugation at 34,000× g for 5 min (Allegra® 64R centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA, USA) [21 (link),22 (link)]. In the case of cisplatin, a 2 mg/mL solution in water was added to 10 mg/mL AgPF6 (1:2 molar ratio), and left under stirring overnight, in order to precipitate AgCl, which was then removed via centrifugation at 53,000× g for 30 min (Allegra® 64R centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The supernatant, containing the platinum, was added to a 4.5 mg/mL AOT solution (platinum–AOT molar ratio 1:2), and kept under magnetic stirring for 30 min, which allowed cisplatin–AOT precipitation to occur, prior to centrifugation at 34,000× g for 10 min (Allegra® 64R centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA, USA) [23 (link)]. The three precipitated HIPs were further washed with distilled water, and then dried under a nitrogen flow.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation and Characterization of Diluted Egg White

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh chicken eggs (medium-sized) were bought from a local supermarket in Xuanwu County, Nanjing, China. The eggs were checked for cracks after they were washed with tap water and cleaned with tissue paper. Cleaned and unbroken eggs were selected for the experiment. The eggs were cracked open, and then the egg white was carefully separated from the egg yolk and chalazae using an egg separator. The egg white was then homogenised in a beaker (sealed with aluminium foil) by a magnetic stirrer (CrystalMS2-P1H, Suzhou Jiemei Electronics Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) at 4 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, 300 mL of the homogenised egg white was diluted with three times deionised water (DIW) then was gently stirred manually using a glass stirring rod. The egg white protein was quantified as 24.36 mg/mL using the Biuret reagent method at a pH (S20 SevenEasy pH meter, Mettler Toledo, OH, USA) of 8.79. Whereas an electric conductivity meter (INESA DDBJ-350, INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to determine electric conductivity of 2.37 mS/cm, total dissolved solids (TDS) of 1182 mg/L and salinity of 0.14%. The diluted egg white solution was then centrifuged (Allegra 64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, IN, USA) at 11,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C to remove impurities and insoluble proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lignin Recovery from Deep Eutectic Solvents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lignin dissolved by the eutectic systems during the process was recovered via precipitation. In detail, the framework of ChLA, ChGly, ChLAGly, ChEug, ChCat and Ch4Hba was suppressed by water addition. 75% (w/w) of distilled water was added to approximately 1 g of DES liquid fraction. Conversely, ChZn/GVL fractions were separated from lignin by antisolvent procedure, keeping a 9:1 ratio of water addition, according to a previous work [12 (link)]. Thirdly, lignin was precipitated from alkaline solutions by acidification. In detail concentrated H2SO4 was added to reach pH 2, according a previously presented protocol [17 (link)].
The precipitation process was accelerated by means of ultracentrifugation (26,000 rpm, 5 min, Allegra 64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, CA, USA), performed at RT. The resulting solid underwent a washing/centrifuging cycle for three times with distilled water and, in the case of ChEug and Ch4Hba, with ethanol. Finally, the recovered precipitate was dried under vacuum and weighted.
The liquid fraction resulting from the separation protocol (see Figure S15) was freeze-dried to remove excess water and tested for the residual antioxidant power. Water and pH adjustments were performed where required.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Determination of Water and Oil Absorption Capacities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The water and oil absorption capacities (WAC and OAC, respectively) were determined according to the method of Piornos et al. [26 (link)]. An 0.5 g sample was mixed with 5 mL distilled water (WAC) or 5 mL refined soybean oil (OAC) for 30 min. The slurry was centrifuged at 8667× g for 10 min (Allegra 64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA), and the unabsorbed water/oil was decanted and weighed. The supernatant was recovered, and its mass was measured. The water and oil absorption values were calculated using Equation (4) and were expressed as mass (g) of water or oil per unit mass (g) of protein.
Water/Oil absorption capacities=W0WsW0
where the W0 is the mass values of water/oil used (g) and Ws is the recovered water in the supernatant/unabsorbed oil (g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Essential Oil Encapsulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Once the chromatographic methods were development and validated, the amount of EO-R. officinalis and L. dentata in the NC was determined indirectly. The NC dispersions were centrifuged at 25,000 rpm at 3°C for 2 h (Allegra 64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, USA). The supernatant was removed and the pellet was washed thrice with methanol to ensure the complete solubilization of monoterpenes. Methanol solutions were analyzed by the previously validated GC-FID method in order to quantify the monoterpenes in NC. Finally, the %EL (3) and %EE (4) were derived as follows: EL%=amount  of  EO  addedamount  of  EO  not  encapsulatedtotal  polymer+amount  of  EO  added100,
EE%=amount  of  EO  addedamount  of  EO  not  encapsulatedamount  of  EO  added100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phytochemical Extraction from Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of phytochemicals was carried out as described: 200 mg of plant material (lyophilized leaves ground with a mixer mill) was sonicated for 30 min. at room temperature (35 kHz, Bandelin sonorex, Berlin, Germany) in 4 mL of EtOH/H2O (50:50, v/v), containing sodium metabisulfite (1 g/L). After centrifugation (5 min, 8602× g RCF at 10 °C, Allegra 64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) the ethanolic extract was collected and filtered (Phenex, NY 0.20 μm porosity, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) and kept at 4 °C before analysis. Each extraction was performed at least in duplicate. Each sample was characterized by its mean content of alkaloids, chlorogenic acids and xanthones, expressed as mg/g of leaves (dry weight).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Stabilization of ddMTX-loaded SLNs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SLNs obtained through the coacervation method were stabilized by PVA9000. A suitable procedure was set up to obtain PVA120000 coating. Briefly, the ddMTX-loaded SLNs, plain or functionalized with proteins, were centrifuged at 26,000 rpm for 30 min (Allegra® 64R centrifuge, Beckmann Coulter, Paolo Alto, CA, USA). The precipitate was concentrated to 2.5% lipid through re-suspension in a 25 mg/mL PVA120000 solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mango Peel Bioactive Compound Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bioactive compounds were extracted from freeze-dried mango peel, using a solution of ethanol/water (80:20 v/v). Ethanol solution was added to mango peel (1:10 w/v), sonicated for 30 min (Bransonic, Danbury, CT, USA), and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C (Allegra 64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Then, the supernatant was filtered, and the procedure was repeated twice. Ethanol was removed by rotary evaporation and the remaining water by freeze drying. The dry mango peel extract (MPE) obtained was stored in amber vials at −80 °C and used for all subsequent in vitro and in vivo experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cultivation and Supernatant Separation of Lactobacillus Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The frozen strains F17 and H52 were removed from a –80 °C ultra-low temperature freezer (DW-HL668, Zhongke MeiLing Cryogenics Company, Ltd., Hefei, China) and thawed at room temperature, and then cultured in Man–Rogosa–Sharpe (MRS) broth (Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The bacteria were transferred to fresh MRS broth and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, then the bacteria count of both F17 and H52 broths was adjusted to 1 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mL using a UV/vis double beam U-2910 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). After that, the fermentation supernatant was separated from the bacteria by centrifugation at 8000× g for 15 min at 4 °C with a cryogenic high-speed Allegra 64R centrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The bacterial precipitate was discarded and the supernatants containing the products of strains F17 and H52 were stored at 4 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ACE Inhibitory Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ACE inhibitory (ACE-i) activity was determined using the method of Luo et al. [32 (link)]. Briefly, a mixture of 50 μL of sample solution and 50 μL of ACE solution (25 mUmL1) was pre-incubated at 37 °C for 10 min, followed by incubation with 150 μL of the substrate (8.3 mM HHL in 50 mM sodium borate buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl at pH 8.3) at 37 °C for 30 min. Distilled water was used as the blank and control, while Captopril (1 mgmL−1) was used as positive control. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 250 μL 1 M HCl, and the resulting hippuric acid was extracted by the addition of 500 μL of ethyl acetate. After centrifugation (3000 rpm, 10 min) (Allegra 64R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA), a 200 μL of the upper layer was transferred into a glass tube and dried for 15 min at 90 °C. The hippuric acid was re-dissolved in 1 mL of distilled water, and the absorbance was measured at 228 nm using a fluorescence microplate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Grodig/Salzburg, Austria). The ACE-I activity was calculated using Equation (9), and the result was expressed in % of ACE-I inhibition.
ACEI activity=Absorbance sampleAbsorbance controlAbsorbance sampleAbsorbance blank×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!