The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genejet plant genomic dna purification mini kit

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Lithuania

The GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit is a laboratory tool designed for the rapid and efficient isolation of high-quality genomic DNA from a variety of plant tissues. The kit utilizes a spin column-based method to purify DNA, providing a streamlined process for DNA extraction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using genejet plant genomic dna purification mini kit

1

Genomic Sequencing of Soybean Genotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lines selected for sequencing were grown in a greenhouse and leaf tissue was collected 3 weeks after planting. For each genotype, a bulked sample of 12 plants were collected and leaf tissue was lyophilized and ground. Genomic DNA was extracted using the GeneJet Plant Genomic DNA purification mini kit (Thermo Scientific, Boston, MA, USA) and 150-bp DNA fragments were sequenced with the NextSeq Sequencing instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Adapters were removed from the raw Fastq files using Trimmomatic v0.36 (Bolger et al., 2014 (link)), and sequencing reads were mapped to the soybean genome Wm82.a2.v1 (https://data.jgi.doe.gov) with Bowtie2 v2.3.3.1 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012 (link)). SNP and indel calls were performed with the GATK HaplotypeCaller software (McKenna et al., 2010 (link)) and variants were annotated with SNPeff version 4.3t (Cingolani et al., 2012 (link)). Variant visualization in the Chr 20 QTL region was performed with the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV - v2.9.5) (Robinson et al., 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cloning and Sequencing of GBSS Gene Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from leaf tissue of Kuras was extracted using Gene Jet Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham USA), and used to amplify two fragments of 508 and 684 bp of the GBSS gene (Supplementary Fig. S1). 250 ng of DNA was used as template in a PCR with 0.5 µmol of primers (Supplementary Table S1) StGBSSExf and StGBSSExr, and primers StGBSSExon3f and StGBSSExon3r (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), Phusion HF polymerase, dNTP, and HF buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) according to the supplier’s instructions. The PCR was as follows: 98 °C for 1 min, 30 cycles at 98 °C for 10 s, 64 °C for 10 s, 72 °C for 15 s and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.
The PCR product was ligated to pJET1.2/blunt using a CloneJET PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) following transformation to One Shot® TOP10 Chemically Competent Escherichia coli (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). After overnight incubation at 37 °C on LB plates containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin, plasmids were purified from 12 randomly picked colonies and insert sequenced (GATC Biotech, Konstanz, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Potato Genome Sequencing and CRISPR Targeting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from Desiree leaf tissue using the Gene Jet Plant Genomic DNA purification Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and sequenced through the Illumina TruSeq PCR-free library preparation (average fragment size 350 bp) and Illumina HiSeqX (PE 2 × 150 bp) (National Genomics Infrastructure, Stockholm, Sweden). Targets were selected in regions of exon 5 in Sbe1 (GenBank accession no. NW_006238958.1:c2098376-2090439) and in exon 3 in Sbe2 (GenBank accession no. NW_006238947.1: c2592132-2611729) using CRISPR RGEN Tools (http://www.rgenome.net/cas-designer) and a previously available guide design tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/). Double sgRNA targets were selected for each gene and named BE1T3 and BE1T4 as well as BE2T3 and BE2T4 (Fig. S1). All sgRNAs were designed to target allelic homologous regions, except for BE2T4 which had a mismatch at the first bp prior PAM in one of the four alleles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic DNA Isolation and Gene Cloning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA for gene cloning was isolated from shoots of R. nigrum, R. uva-crispa, R. aureum and P. avium plants using a GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania, Vilnius). Gene fragments were isolated by PCR using partially degenerated primers designed to match the consensus sequence derived by aligning homologous sequences from the Pentapetalae taxonomic branch (Table S1). Sequences for the alignments were obtained by analyzing NCBI nucleic acid (NR), transcript shotgun assembly (TSA) and whole genome sequence (WGS) databases. PCR reactions were performed with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania, Vilnius). All PCR fragments were cloned and sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transgene Insertion Verification via PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To verify transgene insertion, genomic DNA was isolated from 100 mg of fresh leaves of wild type or transgenic lines using the GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was used as a template in PCR reactions to amplify the DypB gene. The coding region of the native DypB sequence was amplified using sense (5′-atgccaggcccagtcgcgagattggc-3′) and antisense (5′-gtggtgatgatgatgatgttgcgatac-3′) primers while for the optimized sequence; sense (5′-atgaaaactaatcttttcttgtttcttatc-3′) and antisense (5′-tcacaactcgtcatgatgatgatgatg-3′) primers were used. The selectable marker gene neomycin phosphotransferase (NPTII) was amplified by a sense (5′-atggggattgaacaagatggattgc-3′) and antisense (5′-gaagaactcgtcaagaaggcgatag-3′) primers. The PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, stained in ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Heading Date Variation in Near-Isogenic Wheat Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two pairs of the near-isogenic lines “Ppd-m” and its sister line “Ppd-0m”, “Ppd-w” and its sister line “Ppd-0w” and their parental forms Sonora (К-47942, Vrn-A1/Vrn-B1/Vrn-D1 and Ppd-A1b/Ppd-B1a/Ppd-D1b) and PSL2 (Photoperiod Sensitive Line 2, Vrn-A1/Vrn-B1/vrn-D1 and Ppd-A1b/Ppd-B1b/Ppd-D1b), which have different heading dates, were used in this investigation. Lines “Ppd-m” and “Ppd-w” differ from their sister lines by the introgressions on the 2B chromosome from the Sonora variety. This difference was shown previously using SSR analysis [14 (link)]. An analysis of specific molecular markers also demonstrated that the near-isogenic lines (NILs) have recessive alleles of Ppd-D1 and Ppd-A1 [14 (link)]. DNA was extracted from the seedlings using the GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BrAD-seq Based DNA Sequencing Library Prep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted using a GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) from plants grown for a month, and DNA‐Seq libraries were prepared based on BrAD‐seq (Townsley et al., 2015) with the following modifications. After DNA fragmentation with Covaris E220 (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA), the fragmented DNA was end‐repaired, A‐tailed, and adapter‐ligated with Y‐adapter. Enrichment PCR was then performed with the adapter‐ligated product as previously described (Townsley et al., 2015). After final library clean‐up with AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), DNA‐Seq libraries were sequenced at Novogene (Sacramento, CA, USA) using the HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). All data are deposited in sequence read archive (accession no. PRJNA527863).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Efficient DNA Extraction from Fresh and Herbarium Plant Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh or dried plants. In fresh samples, several stems from one specimen were ground with steel beads in a Bioprep-24 Homogenizer for 35 seconds, and DNA was extracted using the GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The Novabeads Plant DNA Kit (Novazym, Poland) was used to extract DNA from herbarium samples. The isolated DNA was dissolved in TE buffer and stored at –20°C. The quality of the isolated DNA was evaluated by electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gel. The concentration and purity of DNA samples were determined using the Epoch Multi-Volume Spectrophotometer System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping of Arachis NAM Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples from all the NAM lines used in this study were extracted from young leaves using Thermo Scientific GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit. The DNA samples were checked for quality on 0.8% agarose gels and quantified on a Nanodrop 8000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Affymetrix GeneTitan platform was used to genotype both NAM populations with the 58K SNP ‘Axiom_Arachis’ array (Clevenger et al., 2017; Pandey et al., 2017b). Initially, the target probes for 581 samples for NAM‐T and 496 samples for NAM‐F were prepared using a minimum of 20 μL DNA with a concentration 10 ng/μL. The samples were then amplified, fragmented and hybridized on the array chip followed by single‐base extension through DNA ligation and signal amplification according to the procedure explained in the Affymetrix Axiom® 2.0 Assay Manual (http://axiom_2_assay_auto_workflow_user_guide.pdf). The GeneTitan Multi‐Channel Instrument (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was then used for staining and scanning the samples to derive the genotypic information for each line. The genotypic data for each line were generated and stored in the form of.CEL file format.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plant Genomic DNA Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from leaf samples of two plant species was extracted using Thermo Scientific GeneJet Plant Genomic DNA Purification Mini kit and stored at −20°C for further investigation (Long et al., 2019 (link)). The extracted DNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel in 1X TAE buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!