The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

S1699

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Denmark

The S1699 is a lab equipment product from Agilent Technologies. It is designed for general analytical and scientific applications. The product's core function is to provide a reliable and accurate measurement solution for users. Further details on the intended use or specific features of the S1699 are not available.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

83 protocols using s1699

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of DFTD Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DFTD tissues of diseased animals (328T1 and 463T1) were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and paraffin-embedded. 2 μm FFPE consecutive tumor sections were stained with Hematoxylin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and Eosin G (Carl Roth). For immunohistochemical stainings, heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer at pH 6.0 (S1699; Dako, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), EDTA at pH 8.0 or TE at pH 9.0. Sections were stained with antibodies specific to STAT3 (1:200; pH 6; 9139; Cell Signaling Technology), phospho-STAT3 (S727) monoclonal rabbit (1:80; pH 9; 9134; Cell Signaling Technology); EGFR monoclonal mouse (1:300; 610016; pH 9; BD Biosciences), HER2/ERBB2 monoclonal rabbit (1:200, 4290; Cell Signaling Technology), HER3/ERBB3 monoclonal rabbit (1:200, 12708; Cell Signaling Technology), Periaxin/PRX (1:200, HPA001868, Sigma Aldrich), MMP2 (1:200; ab37150, Abcam), Ki67 (1:1000; NCL-Ki67p; Novocastra, Leica Biosystems;) or Cleaved Caspase 3 (Asp175) (1:200, 9661S, Cell Signaling Technology) using standard protocols (see also Table S1). Images were photographed using an Olympus BX 53 microscope, and were quantified using HistoQuest TM software (TissueGnostics GesmbH, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemistry of FFPE Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissues slides from synovium, intestine, salivary glandy, and lung were deparaffinised and rehydrated. The slides were then permeabilised for 10 min in 0.3% Triton X-100 and washed further in 1× PBS for 5 min. Antigen retrieval was performed using the NxGen decloaking chamber (Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA, USA) in boiling pH6 Citrate (Agilent, S1699) and pH9 Tris-based antigen retrieval solutions for 20 min each. Tissue slides were blocked in 1xPBS with a 3% BSA (Merck, A7906), 10% Donkey serum (Bio-Rad, C06SB) and FcR Blocking Reagent, human (Miltenyi, 130-059-901, 1:200 dilution) solution for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were washed in 1xPBS for 10 min and then stained with DAPI (Thermo, D3571) for 15 min. Slides were washed in 1xPBS for 5 min and coverslipped with mounting media (50% glycerol – Sigma, G5516 and 4% propyl gallate – Sigma, 2370).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Staining of α-Dystroglycan

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was carried out on 2 μm formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections using standard procedures. In brief, antigen retrieval was achieved with target retrieval solution (S1699, Agilent Technologies) via microwave heating. Incubation with the primary antibody IIh6 (Santa Cruz) at a concentration of 4 μg/ml was done at room temperature for one hour. As a detection system, biotinylated anti-mouse IgM (BA2020, Vector Labs) and streptavidin-HRP (RE 7104, Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) was used. Samples were developed via exposure to 3,3`-diaminobenzidine (DAB+, K3468, Agilent) and counterstained with hematoxylin Gill’s Formula (H-3401, Vector Labs). For IHC staining against α-DG on mouse FFPE tissue, Crystal MausBlock (Fa. DCS, Hamburg, Germany, ML125R015) was used to avoid non-specific binding of the secondary antibody. Processed slides were scanned on a Vectra Polaris™ slide scanner using 40-fold scan resolution and snapshots taken via Phenochart 1.0.8 software (both AKOYA Biosciences, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microglial Cell Quantification by Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the ratio of TMEM119+ cells (microglia) to Iba-1+ cells (microglia and macrophages), immunofluorescence staining was performed. After deparaffinization and rehydration, heat-induced antigen retrieval using a target retrieval solution (pH 6.1; S1699, Agilent Technologies, California, USA) was performed. Next, the sections were incubated in a serum-free protein block (Agilent Technologies, California, USA) at TA for 30 min and then incubated with anti-Iba-1 antibody and anti-TMEM119 antibody at 4 °C overnight. Primary-stained sections were incubated with appropriate Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies for 30 min at TA. The following secondary antibodies were used, respectively: Donkey anti-goat IgG secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, USA) and Donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen, Massachusetts, USA). After washing with PBS, sections were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, California, USA). Images of specimens were obtained by fluorescence microscopy (BZ9000, Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Detection of FZD2 in Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining was performed to detect FZD2 expression in tissue samples. The standard streptavidin–biotin–peroxidase complex method was used for IHC staining. Briefly, after blocking of endogenous peroxidase activity in tissue sections with 3% H2O2 and antigen retrieval with a target retrieval solution (S1699; Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, the sections were incubated with 10% normal goat serum (S-1000; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) in PBS for 30 min. Next, sections were incubated with a primary anti-FZD2 antibody (ab109094, 1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C overnight. After three washes with PBS, the sections were incubated with donkey anti-goat IgG H&L (HRP) (ab205723, 1:2000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, sections were incubated with a peroxidase substrate solution (Sk-4100, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) until the desired staining intensity was attained. Sections were rinsed with tap water, counterstained with haematoxylin, and mounted with coverslips. The results of IHC staining were viewed and scored separately by two experienced pathologists. The expression levels of FZD2 expression were assessed and scored as follows: negative (0; complete absence of staining), weak staining (score: 1), moderate staining (score: 2), or strong staining (score: 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Detection of CD3 and FoxP3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3 µm thick paraffin sections were subjected to deparaffinization/hydration as follows: (1) suspension in xylene for 10 min for four times; (2) 5 min in isopropanol twice; (3) 5 min in 96% ethanol twice; (4) 5 min in 70% ethanol; (5) 10 min in double distilled water twice. Antigen unmasking was performed by boiling slides in a citrate-based target retrieval solution (Agilent Dako #S1699, Jena, Germany) for 20 min. Then, the slides were cooled to room temperature and the sections were washed in PBS twice, followed by incubation in 0.1% Triton X-100-PBS for 4 min. The slides were washed with PBS two more times. The slides were blocked for 45 min using an immunoblock solution (Roth #T144.1, Karlsruhe, Germany). The primary antibody against CD3 (clone M-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-1127) or FoxP3 (clone 2A11G9, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-53876, Dallas, TX, USA) diluted 1:50 in the immunoblock solution was added to the slides and was allowed to incubate for ≥16 h at 4 °C. Signal detection was obtained using Histofine Simple Stain Max PO detection system (#414161F, Nichirei Biosciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and DAB peroxidase substrate kit (#SK-4100, Linaris, Vector laboratories, Dossenheim, Germany). Counterstaining was employed using hematoxylin. Finally, images were acquired on a Keyence microscope (BZ-8000K, Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of SGLT-2, GLUT1, and GLUT3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biopsies from the peritoneum were formalin-fixed in 4% buffered formalin and paraffin-embedded following routine protocols [26] . Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described [27, 28] . Dewaxed and rehydrated tissue sections were incubated in peroxidase blocking solution (S 2023; Agilent) to block endogenous peroxidases. Pretreatment was performed in a steamer, using an antigen retrieval solution (for SGLT-2: pH 6, S 1699, for SLC2A1 and SL-C2A3: pH 9, S 2367; Agilent). The staining method used a dextrancoated peroxidase coupled polymer system (EnVisionTM Detection Kit, Peroxidase/DAB, Rabbit/Mouse, K 5007; Agilent). As positive control, the following tissues were used: kidney for SGLT-2, placenta for GLUT1, and testis for GLUT3 expression. The following antibodies were used: anti-SLC2A1 (HPA031345, 1:1,500; Sigma), anti-SLC2A3 (HPA006539, 1:400; Sigma), and anti-SGLT-2 (clone D6, 1:50; Santa Cruz). The sections were examined with the Olympus VS120 automated slide scanner equipped with a BX61VS microscope (objective: UPLSAPO 40x; Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histological Assessment of Osteoarthritis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The knee joints were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for 24 h then decalcified in Immunocal (StatLab, McKinney, TX) for 3 days; fresh Immunocal was changed every 24 h. Tissues were processed and paraffin-embedded, then 5-μm-thick sagittal sections were generated, starting from the medial side of the knees. They were stained with Safranin-O. OARSI scoring was based on an established scoring system [39 (link)]. Synovitis scoring was based on the severity of synovium hyperplasia (score range 0–3) and inflammatory cell infiltration (score range 0–3) in the sub-synovial region [40 (link)]. All histological scoring was performed by two blinded reviewers.
For immunohistochemistry, the sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated using xylene followed by an ethanol gradient. Antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer (Dako, S1699) at 3 psi. The sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against GSDMD (1:200, Abcam, ab219800), followed by 1 h incubation with biotinylated goat secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, BA-9200). DAB reagent (Vector Laboratories, SK-4100) was used for the peroxidase-substrate reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Staining of CD66b and BDNF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The paraffin-embedded samples were cut into 4 µm sections, deparaffinized, and incubated in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0, S1699; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 20 min in a microwave oven. Blocking buffer (Dako) with 10% fetal bovine serum in PBS was added to the slides for 10–20 min, and then a specific serum-free protein block (Dako) was added for 30 min at RT. After washing, the sections were stained using Dako Autostainer Plus [16 (link)] with the following primary antibodies: rat monoclonal anti-CD66b antibody (1:500; ab233811, clone 2F12E8; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), rabbit monoclonal anti-BDNF (CRC patients 1:500, for mice 1:1000, pH 6, RT, 1 h; ab108319, Abcam). The secondary antibody Envision+ System-HRP-labelled polymeric anti-rat/anti-rabbit antibody (Dako) was visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) and counterstained with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Xenograft Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor xenograft samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 hours immediately after necropsy and then embedded in paraffin. IHC studies were performed using 5 μm thick formalin-fixed deparaffinized sections that were rehydrated with xylene and serial dilutions of ethanol and distilled water. Samples were incubated in antigen retrieval buffer (S1699, DAKO) and heated in a steamer oven at 97°C for 20 minutes. The antigen-antibody binding was detected by the Bond Polymer Refine Detection system (DS9800, Leica Microsystem). Xenograft tumor tissue was evaluated by IHC for GR expression using an anti-GR-XP antibody (D8H2, 1:500, Cell Signaling) and the percentage of positively-staining xenografted tumor cells estimated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!