The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

59 protocols using ips e max cad

1

Preparation and Characterization of CAD/CAM Ceramic Blocks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After mounting of Vitablocs Mark II CAD and IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) blocks, ceramic blocks measuring 5 mm in length, 5 mm in width, and 3 mm in height were sectioned using a diamond-coated cutting disc (Mecatome T201A, Presi, Grenoble, France) under copious water irrigation. The accuracy of the samples was checked by an electron caliper for 0.1 mm (Mitutoyo Co, Kanagawa, Japan).
Crystallization of IPS e.max CAD samples was done by sintering at 850°C for 30 min, in an electric furnace (Programator P300, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein).
One surface of the samples was polished using 400-, 600-, 800-, 1000-, 1200-, and 1500-grit abrasive papers, in a polishing machine (Malek Teb, Iran) under copious water irrigation.
A total of 40 cubic blocks were made of each ceramic type.
Next, the Vitablocs Mark II and e-max ceramic blocks were randomly divided into five groups (n = 8).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fabrication and Characterization of CAD/CAM Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 81 glazed samples were prepared, with 27 of each of the 3 CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials: IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), Vita Suprinity (Vita Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter Bad Säckingen, Germany), and Vitablocs Mark II (Vita Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter Bad Säckingen, Germany). All samples were manufactured using a CAD/CAM machine (Amann Girrbach, Germany). Blocks of material were installed on a milling machine (CAM) to produce 27 blocks from each material with a uniform and standardized dimensional size (16×12 mm) and thickness (2.1 mm) for each restorative material, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were finished and smoothed with 300 to 800 grit silicon carbide paper (Dentsply Prosthetics Brasseler USA). After cleaning with distilled water in an ultrasonic machine, the samples were washed with isopropanol to remove any grease residue and were then dried with compressed air. The Vita Suprinity and Vitablocs Mark II samples were sintered for 2 h at 1550°C in a furnace (Programat P310; Ivoclar Vivadent AG), while the lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent AG) blocks were crystallized, as recommended by the manufacturer. All samples of each group were further divided into 3 equal subgroups of 9 each according to the miswak oral hygiene aid type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lithium Disilicate Veneers: Substrate and Fabrication Impact

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The investigated groups (Table 1) differed in the tooth substrate on which the occlusal veneers were bonded (E: enamel or D: dentin) and in the manufacturing procedure of the lithium disilicate reinforced glass-ceramic (LS2) restorations (CAD: milling or PRE: heat-pressing). The following four groups (n = 20 per group) were assessed:
(1) "E-CAD": CAD/CAM fabricated LS2 occlusal veneer (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) bonded to enamel;
(2) "E-PRE": heat-pressed LS2 occlusal veneer (IPS e.max press; Ivoclar Vivadent) bonded to enamel;
(3) "D-CAD": CAD/CAM fabricated LS2 (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) bonded to dentin;
(4) "D-PRE": heat-pressed LS2 occlusal veneer (IPS e.max press; Ivoclar Vivadent) bonded to dentin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Analysis of CAD/CAM Dental Ceramics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five materials were used in this study, IPS e-max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan Liechtenstein), IPS e-max sintered at 800°C, IPS Empress CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan Liechtenstein), IPS Empress Multi CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan Liechtenstein), and Vita Enamic (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). Chosen materials represent the most common used group in CAD/CAM technic. CAD/CAM blocks was cut into 1mm slice and polished on a wet rotary polisher with 800 and 1200-grit silicon paper.
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were measured in 2θ range of 5-80° 2Θ by using a PANalytical X'Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer equipped with Ni-filtered Cu Kα1 radiation (Kα1 = 1.54060 Å, U = 40 kV, I = 30 mA). The experimental XRD patterns were correlated with the patterns obtained from database of inorganic crystal structure (COD) and analyzed. Ceramics phase was identify using Match! 3.6.1.115 software.
The ATR (Attenuated Total Reflection) spectra were measured using Nicolet iS50 FT-IR (Thermo Scientific) spectrometer equipped with an Automated Beamsplitter exchange system (iS50 ABX containing DLaTGS KBr detector), built-in all reflective diamond ATR module (iS50 ATR), Thermo Scientific PolarisTM and HeNe laser as an IR radiation source. Spectral resolution was set to 4 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Digitally Designed Dental Veneers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After preparation, the teeth were fixed in putty silicone bases to ensure better control during further clinical and laboratory steps (Figure 2a). The prepared teeth were scanned using a Ceramill Map 600 scanner (Amann Girrbach AG, Koblach, Austria), and the designing of each veneer was undertaken using Ceramill Mind software (Amann Girrbach AG) (Figure 2b). The cement gap was set to 0.02 mm, the milling device was a Ceramill Motion 2 (Amann Girrbach AG), and IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Zurich, Switzerland) material was used for milling the veneers. All further laboratory steps were performed according to manufacturer instructions for use, using crystallization and firing parameters provided by the manufacturer [14 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

IPS e.max Press and CAD Polishing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In the present study, 144 LDGC specimens were used (12 × 4 × 2 mm). Seventy-two specimens were produced by pressing from ingots (IPS e.max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein), and the remaining 72 were produced by milling from blocks (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein). Under the manufacturer’s instructions, the firing processes of the IPS e.max Press (IP) specimens were applied, as indicated in Table 1; the crystallization process of the IPS e.max CAD (IC) specimens was completed at 840°C, and the glaze processes were applied as indicated in Table 1. The specimens belonging to the IP and IC groups were randomly divided into four groups according to their polishing processes and polished with 600-, 800-, and 1200-grit silicon carbide paper under water for 60 seconds to standardize the surface quality. The polishing kits specified in Table 2 were used unidirectionally for 60 s each, with a maximum tip rotating speed of 8000 rpm, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with an average pressure of 2 N. All procedures were performed by the same operator to apply uniform pressure and application procedures during polishing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of Buckling Resistance of NiTi Files

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Buckling resistance was evaluated using a universal testing machine (UTM; Universal Mechanics Analyzer, IB Systems, Seoul, Korea), which consisted of a stainless-steel jaw operated by a reversible geared motor, a staging platform connected to a load cell, and a torque gauge. Lopes et al. [14 (link)] measured the buckling resistance as the force generated when an axial force caused a lateral elastic displacement of 1 mm of a NiTi file. In the present study, a NiTi file was compressed in the axial direction at 1.2 mm/s, while the tip of the file was placed in a small dimple prepared on a ceramic block (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (Figure 1A). The force generated by the 2 mm axial movement was recorded as the buckling resistance. During the buckling resistance test, the DR1 file did not bend following the application of a downward force, and therefore, its buckling resistance could not be measured. The test was performed on 15 new instruments of DR2, HyFlex Remover, and Mtwo R25/05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Randomized Comparison of Dental Restorations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Randomization was carried out using computerized sequence generation (https://www.randomizer.org/). Participants were assigned into two groups (A and B) according to the type of restorative material received. Each participant received an opaque sealed envelope with a randomized number. Group A received CAD/CAM lithium disilicateceramic blocks (IPS E.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Lieschtenstein, Germany) restorations and group B received CAD/CAM nano-hybridcomposite blocks (Grandio, VOCO, GmgH, Cuxhaven, Germany) restorations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Preparation of Bovine Mandibular Incisors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of specimens was performed according to protocol published in Sagen et al. [8 (link)]
Bovine mandibles (4–6 years old) were obtained from the Norwegian food producer Nortura. A total of 190 bovine mandibular incisors were extracted, cut and mounted in epoxy resin (EpoFix, Struers, Copenhagen, Denmark) with buccal surface exposed.
Circular zirconia (n = 100, Starceram Z, H.C. Starck Ceramics GmbH, Selb, Germany) and lithium disilicate (n = 50, IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein, ) rods (5 mm diameter, 11.5 mm length) were produced by CAD/CAM technique (Solidworks CAD, Dassault Systemes, Waltham, Massachusetts. hyperDENT CAM software, FOLLOW-ME!, Munich, Germany. Milled in Röders RXD5C, Soltau, Germany). The rods were ground at one end using P500 silicon carbide paper (SiC, Struers, Copenhagen, Denmark) to obtain a uniform surface roughness. Before further surface treatment the rods were cleaned with a dental steamer (Steamer X3, Amann Girrbach, Pforzheim, Germany) and thoroughly air-dried.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Milling Accuracy of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate and Lithium Disilicate Crowns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using a three-dimensional (3D) optical scanning device (Ceramill Map400, Amann Girrbach, Koblach, Vorarlberg, Austria), a 3D digital model of a morse taper universal abutment (Munhão Universal, Intraoss, Itaquaquecetuba, São Paulo, Brazil) with a 4.5 mm diameter, 6 mm height, and 2.5 mm collar height was obtained. From this model, and regarding the anatomy of a mandibular first molar, a monolithic crown was drawn using CAD software (Ceramill Mind, Amann Girrbach). From this CAD model, 20 ZLS crowns (Suprinity, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) and 20 LDS crowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) were milled (Ceramill Motion 2, Amann Girrbach). Integrity of crown margins was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-5600LV, Jeol, Boston, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!