The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rnalater ice

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany

RNAlater-ICE is a storage reagent designed to stabilize and preserve RNA in tissue samples. It is used for the immediate stabilization of RNA in tissues, cells, or other biological samples at the point of collection, allowing for safe transportation and storage prior to RNA extraction and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

96 protocols using rnalater ice

1

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were suspended in RNAlater ICE (Ambion) and stored at −20°C. mRNA was isolated from RNAlater ICE stabilized tissues or directly from in vitro cultures of monolayers or cell-laden hydrogels with TRIzol reagent (Ambion). Tissue samples were homogenized with a Polytron PT 2100. Assays were carried out on an ABI 7500 RT-PCR system with TaqMan Universal Master Mix II and validated PrimeTime primer probe sets (Integrated DNA Technologies). A first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fisher) was used to transcribe 5 μg RNA/20 μL. cDNA (100 ng) was used per RT-PCR reaction in triplicates. The Δ-Δ-CT method was used to comparatively assess mRNA quantity. All data are represented as a sample’s value normalized to GAPDH relative to source tissue–derived ADMSCs, source tissue, or endogenous BAT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mouse Intestine and Colon RNA Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse SI and colon tissues were opened longitudinally, and rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline. For the SI, villi were removed from the distal quarter of the proximal quarter, and tissue was then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tissue was transferred from liquid nitrogen to pre-cooled RNALaterIce (Ambion/Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) at −80 °C for 30 min, and then was transferred to −20 °C for at least 48 h. Immediately before RNA isolation, tissue in either RNALater or RNALaterIce was placed in 2–4 ml of RLT/14.3 M β-mercaptoethanol buffer. Tissue was then homogenized using an IKA Ultra-Turrax T25 digital homogenizer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). RNA isolation was then conducted using an RNeasy Mini Kit with an additional DNAse Digestion step (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). For the colon, epithelial RNA processing and isolation were performed as previously described.49 (link) RNA sample concentrations were measured using a Nanodrop-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA was stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative RNA Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain samples in RNAlater–ICE were thawed, lysed, and immersed in 5.3 M guanidine isothiocyanate for 24 h, prior to RNA purification using the PureLink RNA isolation kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). qRT-PCR was performed as previously published with minor modifications (Ojeda-Juarez et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, 500 ng of bulk RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Amplification reactions contained reverse transcriptase, Power PCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and specific primers (designed using Primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/); Supplementary Table 1). PCR amplification was performed on a CFX96 system (Bio-Rad) using the following conditions: 10 min at 95 °C and 40 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 59 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C. A denaturation step was added at the end of the amplification reaction for Tm analysis. The results obtained were analyzed using Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.1 (Bio-Rad). The relative amount of mRNA of every gene versus the internal control (GAPDH) was calculated following the 2−(ΔΔCq) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RNA Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain samples in RNAlater–ICE were thawed, lysed, and immersed in 5.3 M guanidine isothiocyanate for 24 h, prior to RNA purification using the PureLink RNA isolation kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). qRT-PCR was performed as previously published with minor modifications (Ojeda-Juarez et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, 500 ng of bulk RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Amplification reactions contained reverse transcriptase, Power PCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and specific primers (designed using Primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/); Supplementary Table 1). PCR amplification was performed on a CFX96 system (Bio-Rad) using the following conditions: 10 min at 95 °C and 40 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 59 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C. A denaturation step was added at the end of the amplification reaction for Tm analysis. The results obtained were analyzed using Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.1 (Bio-Rad). The relative amount of mRNA of every gene versus the internal control (GAPDH) was calculated following the 2−(ΔΔCq) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pituitary gene expression analysis in Dchs2 mutant mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole pituitaries were dissected from 10-week-old Dchs2+/– (control) and Dchs2–/– (mutant) mice and placed in RNAlater-ice (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AM7030). They were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C. mRNA was extracted using Monarch Total RNA Miniprep kit (New England Biolabs, T2010S) and translated using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (QIAGEN, 205311); then qRT-PCR was performed using QuantiNova SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN, 208152) on a Roche Lightcycler 480. Data were analyzed using ΔΔCT method normalized to housekeeping gene expression; n = 4 pituitaries per genotype. Primers used: Pou1f1 (Pit1) forward CACGGCTCAGAATTCAGTCA, reverse TCCAGAGCATCCTTAGCAGC; Tbx19 (Tpit) forward TGTCTCGCCTGCTTAACGTG, reverse GACAGGGAACATCCGTCTGC; Nr5a1 (Sf1) forward AGCTGCAAGGGCTTCTTCAA, reverse CATTCGATCAGCACGCACAG; Sox2 forward GAGGGCTGGACTGCGAACT, reverse TTTGCACCCCTCCCAATTC; Dchs1 forward TCCACGTTCATCCACTCAGC, reverse GGGGACTGTTCTCACGAAGG; Hprt (housekeeping) forward GTTGGGCTTACCTCACTGCT, reverse TCATCGCTAATCACGACGCT; Actb (housekeeping) forward TTCTTTGCAGCTCCTTCGTT, reverse ATGGAGGGGAATACAGCCC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA Isolation and Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To isolate RNA from cells, the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) was used following the manufacturer’s protocol. To isolate RNA from xenograft tumors, tumor samples stored in RNAlater-ICE (ThermoFisher) were homogenized in 600 μL lysis buffer using a digital ULTRA-TURRAX homogenizer (IKA-labortechnik). Samples were then centrifuged at 13000 rpm/min for 3 min. The supernatant was mixed with equal volume of 70% ethanol, and the RNA was further purified using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RNA was reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa). All reactions were performed in triplicated on an ABI StepOnePlus™ system (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR Advantage qPCR Premix (TaKaRa). The relative quantity of the target genes was calculated using the ΔΔCt method by comparing average Ct of the target and mean Ct of the housekeeping gene, GAPDH. Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Gene Expression via RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure expression of genes of interest, total RNA was extracted from cell lines using a PureLink RNA mini kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol, including treatment of extracted total RNA with DNase treatment. For RNA extraction from mouse tissues, frozen tissue samples were cut and stored for at least 16 h in RNAlater-Ice (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at −20 °C. After tissue transition, total RNA was isolated from the tissue using the mirVana miRNA isolation kit following the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA-free kit was then used to remove the genomic DNA from the extracted total RNA. Once RNA was extracted using either of these kits, 1 μg RNA was reversed transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RT-PCR was performed as follows: 10 μL of Master Mix (7.5 μL of 2× iQ Supermix; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 1.75 μL of molecular grade water, and 0.75 μL of 20× TaqMan gene expression assay mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) were added to 5 μL of diluted (1:25) cDNA. RT-PCR was performed using a C1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All TaqMan assays used were bought from Applied Biosystems. Cyclophilin A (PPIA) and beta-glucuronidase (GUSB) were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hippocampal RNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brains were cryosectioned at 70 μm, and incubated in RNAlater-ICE (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Melbourne, Australia) at −20 °C overnight. Hippocampi were micro-dissected from sections using an Olympus SZ61 microscope and RNA extracted with ZR-Duet DNA/RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, USA), and treated with DNase I. RNA purity was assessed by NanoDrop ND-1000, quantified using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer, and reverse transcribed with Quanta qScript XLT cDNA SuperMix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Corneal Endothelial Cell Transcriptomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood and corneal endothelial tissue were collected from patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty for non-FECD corneal edema. Tissue samples that were utilized for RNA isolation (n = 3) were placed immediately in RNAlater ICE (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and stored until processed for RNASeq studies. Blood samples (n = 5) were collected and DNA was isolated from white blood cells isolated from the buffy coat. RE+/FECD+ samples utilized for comparison to RE+/FECD− samples in this study were derived from patients with a modified Krachmer scale score of either a 5 (>5-mm confluent guttae) or 6 (confluent guttae with edema), and their datasets were previously described.5 (link),6 (link),9 (link) All patients whose samples were utilized in this study provided written informed consent and were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Hereditary Eye Disease study. This research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Corneal Endothelium and FECD Genetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients with FECD (modified Krachmer grade 5 or 6) requiring corneal transplantation and control participants without guttae (grade 0) were enrolled in a Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board-approved Hereditary Eye Disease Study. Patients that participated in the study provided written informed consent and agreed to a blood draw and use of their excised central corneal endothelium/Descemet membrane specimen obtained at endothelial keratoplasty for FECD. DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes and RNA was isolated from corneal endothelium/Descemet membrane specimens following storage in RNAlater ICE (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). This research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!