The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

A1 confocal system

Manufactured by Nikon
Sourced in Japan

The Nikon A1 confocal system is a high-performance laser scanning confocal microscope that provides advanced imaging capabilities. It features a modular design, allowing for customization to meet specific research needs. The A1 system enables optical sectioning and high-resolution imaging of samples, making it a versatile tool for various applications in life sciences and material sciences.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

58 protocols using a1 confocal system

1

Quantifying iNKT Cells in Intestinal Villi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SI tissues (ileum) were frozen in Tissue-Tek OCT Compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA). Frozen tissue blocks were cut into 8 μm-sections, fixed in acetone and stained with PBS-57- loaded CD1d tetramers and antibodies to CD3 and pan-cytokeratin. The images were obtained with a Nikon A1 confocal system. The numbers of iNKT cells in small intestinal villi were counted using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Tenocyte Progenitor Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos processed for fluorescent immunohistochemistry were imaged using a Nikon A1 confocal system (RRID: SCR_020318) with a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted microscope using a CFI Plan Apochromat VC 60XC (water immersion) objective. Embryos processed for isHCR were imaged using Leica TCS SP8 confocal system (RRID: SCR_018169) with a Leica DMi8 inverted microscope using a Plan Apochromat HC 40× (water immersion) objective. Confocal stacks were collected with system optimized spacing of 0.45 microns and were analyzed using ImageJ (RRID: SCR_003070) and Imaris 10 (RRID: SCR_007370) softwares. Tenocyte progenitors at prospective entheses were identified by their proximity to cartilage chondrocytes. To quantify expression of either scxa or sox9a in the selected cell, using ImageJ a projection of a z-stack comprising the entire cell was created (∼8-10 slices) using DAPI signal to identify the edges of the cell. Quantification of fluorescence in the selected cells was performed by creating ROIs around the DAPI signal corresponding to the tenocyte as previously described (Subramanian et al., 2018 (link)). In experiments where Imaris 10 was used, the ROI was created using DAPI as a reference for each tenocyte at each z-section. These ROI surfaces were combined and the mean intensity of scxa, sox9a and col1a was measured in these cellular volumes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Cell Morphology via Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological changes of the cells (3T3 and HaCaT) were evaluated via laser scanning confocal microscopy. After 48-h incubation of cells in the same way as in the toxicity studies, using the enhancer concentration corresponding to their IC15 and IC85, cell samples were prepared for confocal microscopy (see Supplementary data for details). Finally, eight focal planes (pinhole diameter = 19.16 μm) were taken of each sample using a Nikon A1 + confocal system (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with NIS Elements AR 4.20 software (Laboratory Imaging, Prague, Czech Republic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cardiomyocyte Morphometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiac sections were stained with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA; AlexaFluor 555 conjugate; Invitrogen) to identify cell borders, and DAPI to detect nuclei. WGA-stained cells were visualized using a Nikon TE-2000E microscope interfaced with a Nikon A1 confocal system. Cell areas were measured using Nikon Elements software [64-bit version 3.22.00 (Build 710)]. Cardiomyocytes were chosen based on their circularity and whether they had centrally located nuclei. Circularity was calculated using the Shape Factor feature in NIS-Elements AR 4.0. Cardiomyocytes were chosen based on a Shape Factor between 1.0 and 0.895 (radius ratio of 1:1–1:1.4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Enhancer Cytotoxicity in Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The toxicities of selected enhancers were evaluated on two widely used non-malignant cell lines: HaCaT spontaneously immortalized human keratinocytes and 3T3 Swiss albino mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The cell lines were cultivated as described previously13 (link),14 (link). For toxicity studies and confocal microscopy, cells were seeded at a density of 10,000 cells per well into 96-well plates and 100,000 cells per well into 4-well cell-imaging slides. Cell viability was determined using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) uptake assay after 48 h incubation with the enhancer13 (link),14 (link), see Supporting Information for details.
Morphological changes were evaluated using laser scanning confocal microscopy using a Nikon A1 + confocal system after 48 h incubation of the cells with enhancers using concentrations of compounds corresponding to their TC15 and TC85 as described before13 (link),14 (link). Staining for actin and tubulin cytoskeleton was performed for 90 min using 5 U/mL Alexa Fluor 555 phalloidin and 2 µg/mL α-tubulin antibody and Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate, respectively (Supporting Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal Imaging of Fluorescently Labeled Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital images of fluorescent labeling were collected using Nikon A1 confocal system (Japan) equipped with Nikon 90i upright fluorescence microscope and BioRad Laser Sharp 2000 imaging program (Digital BioRad Center, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Alexa Fluor 568 labeling was viewed through 561 excitation laser line with 10 nm resolution of spectra. Alexa Fluor 488 and ByLight 405 were viewed through 488 and 405 excitation laser line, also through 10 nm resolution spectra. Confocal images were captured with ×20 and ×40 objective at iris of 2.0–2.5 in box size of 1,024×1,024. All Z-scan was set up at 1 μm layer of laser scan step and saved as “avi” video files and the clearest double or triple labeling image was selected and converted to Photoshop 7.0.1 (Adobe, CA, USA) through Bio-Rad Plug-In software and stored as “tiff” file at 1,024×1,024 pixels. The electron microscopy microphotographs presented here were taken with FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol for Spinal Cord and DRG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described (Sun et al., 2017 (link)). Briefly, anesthetized mice were transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Lumbar spinal cords (L3–L5) and DRGs were quickly removed and post-fixed in PFA overnight at 4°C. Then the tissues were transferred to 0.1 M phosphate buffer containing 30% sucrose at 4°C. The 40-μm-thick sections prepared by cryostat were washed 3 times and then blocked in 5% goat serum containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature (RT). After incubation in the primary antibody overnight at 4°C, sections were incubated with the secondary antibodies at RT for 2 h and then were counterstained with DAPI. For primary antibodies, we used rabbit anti-CGRP (1:500, ImmunoStar, United States), Isolectin IB4 Conjugate (1:500, Invitrogen, United States), mouse anti-PKC-γ (1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, United States), mouse mouse anti-PV (1:2000, Sigma-Aldrich, United States), rabbit anti-VGAT (1:500, Millipore, United States); For secondary antibodies, we used Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (1:500, Abways Technology, China). The Fluorescence images were captured using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon A1 Confocal System, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Brucella Invasion in Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were infected as described above with Brucella–GFP (MOI of 100:1) and the bacteria number was assessed in cells infected for 24 h, as previously described [47 (link)]. Cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 30 min. After fixation, coverslips were washed three times with PBS. Coverslips were mounted in slides using ProLong Gold with DAPI mounting medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). Confocal microscopy analysis was performed in a Nikon A1 confocal system. Three coverslips were analyzed per sample and images were taken using a 10× objective for six random areas of each coverslip. Images presented here are representative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spheroid Invasion in Collagen Matrix

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB-157 and BT-549 cells were stained with 2 μM Calcein AM before harvesting the cells for spheroid formation. An ATPS technology was used to form spheroids [21 (link)]. Spheroids were suspended in an ice-cold 4 mg/ml solution of type I rat tail collagen (Corning) and then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min to allow collagen gelation. Invasion of the spheroids in collagen matrix was captured using fluorescent confocal microscopy (Nikon A1 confocal system) at a 10X magnification. FITC filter was used to capture images with a z-spacing of 20 μm. NIS Elements software was used for image acquisition. Z-projected images were reconstructed by collapsing the stacks using ImageJ (NIH) and total area of pixels was found using color thresholding of the resulting images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Visualizing Brucella Infection and STING Activation in MEFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6 or STING KO mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (1×104) were plated onto 24 wells containing glass coverslips and infected as described above with Brucella-GFP. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min. Cells were subsequently blocked for 1 h with 3% BSA in PBS at room temperature prior to incubation with anti–GRP78 (BiP) primary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4 °C overnight. For evaluation of STING activation by B. abortus, MEFs cells were infected with B. abortus (MOI of 1000:1) or transfected with dsDNA90 (3 μg/ml) for 4 h. Cells were processed for immunofluorescence as described above and incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against STING as described previously (10 (link)). Anti-rabbit conjugated with Alexa Fluor 546 was used for detection of primary antibodies. Coverslips were mounted in slides using ProLong Gold with DAPI mounting medium (Invitrogen) and confocal microscopy analysis was performed in a Nikon A1 confocal system. Confocal microscopy analysis was performed 4 h after infection given that at this time-point, BiP-expression and STING activation were enhanced on MEFs cells. Three coverslips were analyzed per sample and representative images were taken using a ×40 objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!