The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Clc genomics software

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Denmark

The CLC Genomics software is a bioinformatics suite developed by Qiagen. It provides a comprehensive platform for analyzing and visualizing genomic data. The software offers tools for sequence assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis, enabling users to explore and interpret complex genomic information.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using clc genomics software

1

Phylogenomic Profiling of Bacillus Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BLAST analysis (blastp algorithm, word size 3, e-value 1) was performed to determine polymorphisms in 55 r-proteins, including 34 large and 21 small subunit ones, with the CLC Genomics software (CLC Bio) (Supplementary Table S6). Subsequently, the r-proteins alleles were recorded and combined for all strains in binary form as 1 (present) and 0 (absent). The phyloproteomic tree was built using Dice coefficient and UPGMA clustering with NTSYSpc software ver. 2.1 (Exeter Software). The clusters of bacilli with similar patterns of r-proteins were denoted as ribosomal clusters (r-clusters). Concurrently, we compared amino acids sequences of the r-proteins using MEGA7 software58 (link). Compatibility of the strains’ affiliation to particular r-clusters with their genetic relatedness, i.e. according to the digital DND-DNA hybridization (dDDH) method, was confirmed by comparison of pycA gene42 (link) (Supplementary Fig. S13).
The entire procedure was reproduced for six cold shock proteins (CSPs), CspA, CspB, CspE, CspC, CspD1 and CspD2 (Supplementary Table S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cloning and Structural Modeling of FvUGT1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from RF7–4 ripe fruits using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The FvUGT1 full-length open reading frame was amplified by the Pfx DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, Frederick, MD, USA) using the gene-specific primer pair (ATGGCACCAGTATCAAACCAG/ATTGGTTGTGGTCATTTCCAAC) based on the strawberry genome data in GDR (https://www.rosaceae.org/). The FvUGT1 amino acid sequence was aligned with other plant UGTs using CLC Genomics software (CLC, Aarhus, Denmark). The calmodulin-binding site was predicted utilizing the Calmodulin Target Database (http://calcium.uhnres.utoronto.ca). The homology model of FvUGT1 was constructed based on the crystal structure of grape VvGT1 (pdb code: 2C1Z) in Swiss-model (http://swissmodel.expasy.org) [13 (link)]. The model and template were compared using the Swiss PDB viewer (http://spdbv.vital-it.ch/) [57 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CRISPR sgRNA Design for Brassica Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FRI gene, accession Bra035723 (Sun et al., 2013 (link)), was obtained from the Brassica database1. It was aligned with other Brassica sequences deposited in the NCBI GenBank with CLC Genomics software (Qiagen) to design ‘FRI-Seq’ sequencing primers (Table 1). ‘PDS-Seq-Dig’ sequencing primers (Table 1) were designed by aligning B. napus PDS gene (HM989807) with other GenBank sequences. PCR products were cloned in a pGEM-T-Easy Vector System (Promega), and the plasmid DNA was Sanger-sequenced.
The sequences of FRI and PDS genes obtained from three Brassica species (B. oleracea, B. napus, and B. rapa) were aligned with CLC Genomics software, and potential target sites in conserved regions of FRI and PDS genes were designed with CLC Genomics Workbench and CRISPR RGEN Tools Cas-Designer (Park et al., 2015 (link)).
Double-stranded template DNA for in vitro transcription was obtained by annealing two overlapping oligonucleotides as described by Gagnon et al. (2014) (link). sgRNAs (Table 2) were transcribed in vitro with a HiScribeTM T7 Quick High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (NEB), purified with a MEGAclearTM Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using a NanoVue Plus spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA-seq Analysis of Srsf Knockdowns in RAW MΦ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA-seq analysis was performed on RAW MΦ containing shRNA knockdowns of Srsf6, Srsf2, Srsf1, Srsf7, and Srsf9 compared with SCR control with biological triplicates of each cell line as described in Wagner et al., 2021 (link) using Qiagen CLC Genomics software for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mpro Sequence Comparison Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pairwise and multiple sequence comparisons of Mpro were done using CLC genomics software (Qiagen Inc., USA). The sequence comparison matrix was generated, including the number of gaps, number of different residues and identity %.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA-Seq Transcriptome Profiling of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from tissue using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA), as per the manufacturers protocol. Following extraction, RNA was assessed for quality by visualisation on a 1.2% agarose gel, and quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo scientific). Total RNA samples were sent to Australian Genome Research Facility (Brisbane, Australia) for library construction and sequenced (paired-end) using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing platform. Raw sequence reads (100 bp) were assembled into contigs (>200 bp) using the CLC genomics software (Qiagen). Protein coding regions were determined using the open reading frame (ORF) predictor39 (link). Relative expression of genes in each tissue transcriptome was determined based on RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase of exon per Million mapped reads) values, utilizing the commercially available CLC Genomic Workbench 7 software40 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of a Novel Protein Sequence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences of the core region (internal fragment), 3′ RACE amplicon and 5′ RACE amplicon were assembled, to generate the full length gene sequence. It was translated in silico to generate the protein sequence. Theoretical molecular weight and isoelectric point of the protein were calculated using the Sequence Manipulation Suite v2 (Stothard 2000) (link). MatGat tool (Campanella et al. 2003 (link)) was used for the calculation of similarity and identity with homologous sequences from other plants. Protein alignment was carried out using CLC Genomics software (Qiagen, Germany). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA software (https://www.megasoftware.net/). Modeling and docking analysis with DbCHS, was carried out as described earlier (Awasthi et
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Analysis of LF Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences used in this study were obtained from the GenBank and protein databases, both of which are found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. The obtained sequences comprise LF from Homo sapiens, Camelus dromedarius, Camelus bactrianus, Camelus ferus, Vicugna pacos, Balaenoptera acutorostrata scammoni, Tursiops truncatus, Orcinus orca, Globicephala melas, Monodon monoceros, Delphinapterus leucas, Balaenoptera musculus, Myotis lucifugus, Myotis brandtii, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Capra hircus, Ovis aries, Bos taurus, and Felis catus. The sequences were imported and managed using CLC genomics software (Qiagen software, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!