The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Thermo orbitrap fusion lumos

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Germany

The Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos is a high-performance mass spectrometer designed for advanced proteomics and metabolomics research. It features a hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap configuration that provides exceptional mass accuracy, resolution, and sensitivity across a wide mass range.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using thermo orbitrap fusion lumos

1

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Peptide Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For LC-MS/MS analysis, the fragment peptides were separated by a 120-min gradient elution method at a flow rate of 0.3 μL/min with a Thermo-Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system that is directly interfaced with a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer. The analytical column was a homemade fused silica capillary (75 μm inner-diameter, 150 mm length; Upchurch, Oak Harbor, WA, USA) packed with C-18 resin (pore size 300 Å, particle size 5 μm; Varian, Lexington, MA, USA). Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B is 100% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. The Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was operated in the data-dependent acquisition mode using Xcalibur 4.0.27.10 software. A single full-scan mass spectrum was done in the Orbitrap (300–1500 m/z, 120,000 resolution). The spray voltage was 1850 V and the Automatic Gain Control (AGC) target was 200,000. This was followed by 3-s data-dependent MS/MS scans in an ion routing multipole at 30% normalized collision energy (HCD). The charge state screening of ions was set at 1–8. The exclusion duration was set at 8 s. Mass window for precursor ion selection was set at 2 m/z. The MS/MS resolution was 15,000. The MS/MS maximum injection time was 150 ms and the AGC target was 50,000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

OLIG2 Interactome Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain lysates were pre-cleared with protein A-Sepharose beads (YEASEN Biotech, Cat#36403ES25) and then incubated with primary antibody and protein A-coated Sepharose beads for 2 hr at 4 °C. Following three washes in lysis buffer, bound proteins were eluted from the beads in SDS sample buffer. For analysis by mass spectrometry, immunoprecipitates were first resolved by SDS-PAGE, with each lane cut into four slices for in-gel digestion. Tryptic peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatog-raphy-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos). Basing on the unique peptide numbers of proteins detected, we made the scatter plot of proteins bound to OLIG2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Reversed-phase Peptide LC-MS Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The digested peptides were acidified with 0.1% formic acid and then loaded onto a reversed-phase micro-capillary column using the Thermo EASY-nLC 1200 HPLC system. The MS data were acquired using the Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The elution gradient for the analytical column was 95% mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid; 99.9% water) to 40% mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid; 89.9% acetonitrile) over 60 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LCMS with FAIMS for metabolome analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 3 µL using an MClass UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 µm trapping column (5 μl/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 µm Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 µm × 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (−40v, −60v, −80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 – 1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the ion trap in Rapid mode with a target AGC value of 1e4 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 sec between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each injection was approximately 2 hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Coomassie Gel Band Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bands from a Coomassie-stained polyacrylamide gel were excised, washed, treated with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine and iodoacetaminde to reduce and alkylate cysteines, respectively. Each band was digested overnight with trypsin and extracted peptides were injected onto a C18 column and analyzed on a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Scientific). Supplemental methods contain further details.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Proteomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 4 μL (25%) of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem spectrometer (Thermo) via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 mul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 μm Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column (Waters Corp) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5–30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nL/min (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed in a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with an r = 120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375–1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions. MS/MS scans were acquired at Rapid scan rate (Ion Trap) with an AGC target of 1e4 ions and a max injection time of 100 ms. The total cycle time for MS and MS/MS scans was 2 s. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each sample injection was approximately 2 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Proteomics with FAIMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative LC-MS/MS was performed on 3 μL using an MClass UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 μL/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 μm Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5–30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nL/min (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55°C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (−40v, −60v, −80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with an r = 120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375–1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the ion trap in Rapid mode with a target AGC value of 1e4 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 s between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each injection was approximately 2 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 2 μL (16.6% of total sample) using an MClass UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm × 180 μm trapping column (5 μl/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 μm Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 μm × 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (−40v, −60v, −80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 – 1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the ion trap in Rapid mode with a target AGC value of 1e4 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 sec between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each injection was approximately 2 hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!