The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss v 22.0 program

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS v. 22.0 is a statistical software program developed by IBM. It is designed to analyze and manage data, providing users with a range of tools for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization. The program offers a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, cluster analysis, and time series analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

12 protocols using spss v 22.0 program

1

Mushroom Species Comparative Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three specimens of each mushroom species were used, and all the assays were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed as mean values and standard deviation (SD), and further analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's HSD Test with α = 0.05. This treatment was carried out using SPSS v. 22.0
program. In the case of proximate composition, free sugars, fatty acids, tocopherols and organic acids a student´s t-test was used because there were less than three groups. This treatment was carried out using SPSS v. 22.0 program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all the experiments four samples were analyzed and all the assays were carried out in triplicate. The results are expressed as mean values and standard deviation (SD). The differences between the different samples were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test with α = 0.05. This treatment was carried out using SPSS v. 22.0 program (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antioxidant and Nutritional Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each group, two samples were used and antioxidant evaluation assays, nutritional determinations and colour analysis were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) and further analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's HSD Test (α=0.05). This analysis was carryout out using SPSS v. 22.0 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Plant Growth and Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Blocks design with 10 pots per treatment and n = 3. Statistical analysis was carried out with Statgraphics 5.1.plus (Statistical Graphics Corporation). Data were evaluated by analysis of variance for the main effects (H: number of harvests; G: growing period), whereas the means of values were compared by Tukey's HSD Test at p < 0.05. Chemical composition analyses were performed in three samples for treatment, while all analyses were carried out in triplicate. The results are presented as mean values and standard deviations (SD), while statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v. 22.0 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's HSD Test at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Areal Fraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the areal fraction percentage between cases in the present series and control groups. In this exploratory study, statistical significance was set at p<0.05 and results were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. The χ 2 /Fisher's exact test, the Student t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare semiquantitative grading or demographic data using the p value of 0.05. The SPSS V.22.0 program (IBM Corporation, New York, New York, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Completely Randomized Blocks Experiment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Blocks design with 10 pots per treatment and n = 3. Statistical analysis was carried out with Statgraphics 5.1.plus (Statistical Graphics Corporation). Data were evaluated by analysis of variance, while the means of values were compared by Tukey's HSD Test at p < 0.05. For chemical composition analyses, three samples for each treatment were analysed while all the assays were carried out in triplicate. The results are expressed as mean values and standard deviations (SD), and analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's HSD Test at p < 0.05. This analysis was carried out using SPSS v. 22.0 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Triplicate Assay Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different samples were used and all the extractions and assays were performed in triplicate. The results were expressed as mean values and standard deviation (SD), being analysed using a Student's t-test, with α = 0.05 (SPSS v. 22.0 program, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Analysis of Candida tropicalis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three samples were used for each preparation and all the assays were carried out in triplicate. The results were analyzed using oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were compared using Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) multiple comparisons test, and further coupled to Welch to verify the equality of means. In the case of the graphs of Candida tropicalis, a Student's t-test was used to determine the significant difference among two different samples, with ˛ = 0.05. This treatment was carried out using SPSS v. 22.0 program (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Physical Activity Changes During COVID-19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (K-S) was used to determine the normal distribution of data. The null hypothesis was rejected for sprints > 19 km/h (%; p = 0.011) and in the high intensity running distance (p = 0.008). For parametric data, descriptive analysis was performed and computed as mean (X) and standard deviation (±SD). In contrast, non-parametric data were described as median (1st quartile – Q1; 3rd quartile – Q3). A paired t-test (parametric data) and the Wilcoxon test (non-parametric data) were conducted to compare two moments (pre- versus post-COVID-19 quarantine). The significance level was set at p < 0.05 for all analyses. Subsequently, the effect size measure for non-parametric analysis was calculated, defined as ES = Z/√N, where ES represents the effect size, Z is derived from the z-score of the Wilcoxon (W) test and N is the total number of observations. This analysis considers ES-values as small effect size (r = 0.10), medium effect size (r = 0.30), or large effect size (r = 0.50). Data were analyzed using the “Statistical Package for the Social Sciences” (SPSS v. 22.0 program, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Herbal Blend Phytochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each herbal blend, three individual samples were analyzed, and all assays were prepared in triplicate. The results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s HSD test as p = 0.05, and are expressed as mean values with standard deviation (SD). When less than three results were present in each individual analysis, Student’s t-test p-values were used to determine the significant difference, with p = 0.05. Both of these statistical treatments were carried out using the SPSS v.22.0 program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!