The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using matrigel

1

In Vitro and In Vivo Angiogenesis Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An in vitro angiogenesis assay was conducted to evaluate the formation of three-dimensional tubular structures by endothelial cells cultured on Matrigel (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). HPMEC suspensions (1 × 105 cells/mL) were seeded into μ-Slide angiogenesis plates (ibidi GmbH, Lochhamer Schlag, Germany), which were precoated with Matrigel. After the corresponding interventions, the cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 6 hours, and the development of tubular structures was examined using an inverted microscope. Tube formation was quantified by measuring the lengths of tubes from each well using ImageJ (Media Cybernetics, Atlanta, GA, USA). A Matrigel plug angiogenesis assay was conducted to detect the newly formed blood vessels in the transplanted gel plugs in mice. After mixing high concentration Matrigel (Corning Incorporated Life Sciences, Tewksbury, MA, USA) with an endothelial cell suspension subjected to particular treatments, the mixture was injected into mice subcutaneously. After 14 days of inoculation, the Matrigel plug was excised, fixed with formalin, and stained with endothelial cell marker the CD31(1 : 2,000, Cell Signaling Technology) to detect blood vessels via immunohistochemistry. CD31staining-positive endothelial markers indicated the presence of newly formed capillaries in the sectioned gel plugs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Differentiation of iPSCs into Osteoblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
iPSC colonies were maintained in mTesR medium (StemCell Technologies) and cultured on Matrigel (Corning, 354277). Cells were typically passaged once a week using GCDR (StemCell Technologies). iPSCs were differentiated into NCCs with the STEMDiff Neural Crest Differentiation Kit (StemCell Technologies) according to the company instructions. Briefly, one well of iPSCs was detached with Accutase (ThermoFisher) into single cells. Cells were resuspended in provided medium containing 10 µM Y-27632 (Cell Signaling, 13624S) and plated at 8.6×104 cells/cm2 on Matrigel-coated 12-well plates. Cells were cultured with daily medium changes without Y-27632. On day 6, cells were passaged with Accutase into single cells (NCC P1) and maintained in Mesencult-ACF Plus medium (StemCell Technologies) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine until confluent. Cells were expanded for three passages before osteoblast differentiation. Briefly, cells were passaged at 5×103 cells/cm2 on uncoated 24-well plates and cultured for 4-12 days in osteogenic medium [DMEM/F-12 with GlutaMAX (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.1 µM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate and 200 µM ascorbic acid] with medium changes every other day. Cells were fixed with 4% PFA and stained with 2% Alizarin Red (pH 4.8).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Differentiation of iPSCs into NCCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient and control iPSC lines used in this study were generated by the Cincinnati Children’s Pluripotent Stem Cell Facility. iPSC colonies were maintained in mTesR medium (StemCell Technologies) and cultured on Matrigel (Corning, 354277). Cells were typically passaged once a week using GCDR (StemCell Technologies). iPSCs were differentiated into NCCs with the STEMDiff Neural Crest Differentiation Kit (StemCell Technologies) according to the company instructions. Briefly, one well of iPSCs was detached with Accutase (ThermoFisher) into single cells. Cells were resuspended in provided medium containing 10 µM Y-27632 (Cell Signaling, 13624S) and plated at 8.6 × 104 cells/cm2 on Matrigel-coated 12-well plates. Cells were cultured with daily medium changes without Y-27632. On day 6, cells were passaged with Accutase into single cells (NCC P1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Adipogenic Differentiation of hMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This experiment was performed as described in a previous report [30 ]. Briefly, hMSCs were incubated with adipogenic differentiation medium for 5 days after transfection with the lentivirus and siRNA in vitro. Cells were collected and mixed with 200 μl of Matrigel (BD Biosciences, USA); then, the mixture was injected subcutaneously into the backs of 8-week-old BALB/c-nu/nu male nude mice (Gempharmatech, China). After 6–8 weeks, the cells/Matrigel implants were harvested and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h. Then, the implants were decalcified, embedded and sliced for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, and the fat vacuoles were stained with a Perilipin-1 antibody (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9349) for immunohistochemistry. All data were calculated and analysed with ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Angiogenic Potential of HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Matrigel tube formation assays were performed to assess in vitro angiogenesis using μ-Slide Angiogenesis plate (ibidi, Martinsried, Germany) and Matrigel (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). Briefly, HUVECs (10 4 cells/well) were cultured in the μ-Slide Angiogenesis plate coated with Matrigel and incubated with 0.5% FBS CM-24 h or 0.5% FBS CM-48 h or low serum ECM with or without PI3K inhibitor (LY294002, Cell Signaling Technology) or ERK inhibitor (U0126, Cell Signaling Technology) in triplicate. Tube-like structures in each well were captured under a light microscope. The number of loops (the formed tubes), the length and the area of the formed tubes were scanned and quantitated with ImageJ software. All experiments were assayed with five copies and repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!