Sas for window v9

Manufactured by SAS Institute

SAS for Windows v9.4 is a software application developed by SAS Institute for data analysis and statistical modeling. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, statistical analysis, and reporting. The core function of SAS for Windows v9.4 is to enable users to access, manipulate, and analyze data from various sources, as well as to create reports and visualizations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Close spelling variants of this product

SAS for Windows v9.4 SAS/STAT v9.4 for Windows SAS software v9.4 for Windows SAS Software Package for Windows V9.4 SAS for Windows SAS v9.4

2 protocols using sas for window v9

Comparing CE and LPI Effects on ACA Parameters

Cited 1 time

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The results of the prospective CE study were compared with previously published data from a prospective cohort study on ACA parameter changes before and after LPI from our group [19 (link)]. Only the 34 eyes of the 21 participants who completed the pre- and post- LPI study and had acceptable ASOCT images were included for comparison. A mixed-effect model was used to compare the treatment groups (CE vs. LPI). The fixed effect was the treatment group (CE vs. LPI), and the random effect was the study participants.
All statistical analysis was performed using SAS for Window v9.4 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC), with a P value less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Data are available at https://figshare.com/articles/Data_for_PONE-D-16-07110_LE_vs_LPI_xlsx/3753303.

Melese E., Peterson J.R., Feldman R.M., Baker L.A., Bell N.P., Chuang A.Z, & Blieden L.S. (2016). Comparing Laser Peripheral Iridotomy to Cataract Extraction in Narrow Angle Eyes Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0162283.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Comparative Analysis of Group Differences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Data were summarized by mean (±standard deviation) and compared using two-sample
t-tests for continuous variables or by frequency (%) and compared using the Fisher's exact test for discrete variables. Besides demographics and baseline characteristics, a one-tailed test was used to compare between groups. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS for Window v9.4 (SAS Inc, Cary, NC). A
p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Wotipka E.K., Wright A.J., Fan J.Z., Fuhriman D., Chuang A.Z., Lindhorst G.C., Feldman R.M, & Crowell E.L. (2023). Postoperative Complications of True Dropless Cataract Surgery versus Standard Topical Drops. Journal of Academic Ophthalmology, 15(2), e144-e153.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!