The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using sureplex dna amplification system

1

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PGT-A protocol was similar to our previous report [33 (link)]. In brief, genomic DNA was extracted and amplified using the SurePlex DNA Amplification System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The amplified DNA product was used to prepare the genomic DNA libraries according to the VeriSeq PGS workflow (Illumina, USA). BlueFuse Multi Software (Illumina, USA) was used for data analysis, and the diploid–aneuploid levels of each sample were examined by at least two technicians. Based upon diploid–aneuploid mosaic ratios measured using the hr-NGS platform for biopsied cells [36 (link),37 (link),38 (link)], blastocysts were classified into the following three groups: (i) euploid blastocysts with mosaicism levels ≤ 20%; (ii) mosaic blastocysts with mosaicism levels between 20% and 50%; and (iii) aneuploid blastocysts with mosaicism levels > 50%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Trophectoderm Biopsy and PGT-A Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Once the embryos reached the blastocyst stage, TE biopsy was performed as described by Chen et al. [11 (link)]. The biopsied TE cells were immediately placed in an RNAse–DNAse-free polymerase chain reaction tube and amplified using the SurePlex DNA Amplification System (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The amplified products were analyzed through 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, and successfully amplified DNA had lengths in the range of 100 ± 1000 bp. Extracted cells were placed in 2 μL of buffer and shipped frozen to Genesis Genetics for PGT-A using a high-resolution, next generation sequencing (hr-NGS) platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PGT-A Blastocyst Categorization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PGT-A protocol employed in this study was similar to that described in our previous report [29 (link)]. Genomic DNA was extracted and amplified using the SurePlex DNA Amplification System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The amplified DNA product was utilized to generate genomic DNA libraries following the VeriSeq PGS workflow (Illumina, USA). Data analysis was performed using the BlueFuse Multi Software (Illumina, USA), and at least two technicians assessed the diploid–aneuploid levels of each sample. Blastocysts were categorized into three groups based on diploid–aneuploid mosaic ratios determined using the high-resolution next generation sequencing (hr-NGS) platform on biopsied cells [31 (link),32 (link),33 (link)]: (i) euploid blastocysts with mosaicism levels ≤ 20%; (ii) mosaic blastocysts with mosaicism levels between >20% and <80%; and (iii) aneuploid blastocysts with mosaicism levels ≥ 80%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Whole-Genome Sequencing of Classified Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We analyzed samples that met our inclusion criteria and classified them according to the Ins/Cho ratio into high- and low-ratio groups. We prepared the diluted genomic DNA for subsequent experiments. After the whole-genome amplification using a SurePlex DNA Amplification System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), library preparation was performed using a Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina). Shallow-whole-genome sequencing analysis was conducted with a VeriSeq PGS Kit-MiSeq (Illumina), and the results were analyzed using BlueFuse Multi Software (Illumina). In all cases, the chromosomes were divided into 2500 windows of approximately 1 Mb in size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Menstrual Cycle Extracellular Vesicles Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As detailed above, EVs isolated from EF (n=21) in different menstrual cycle stages (P+2 n=7, P+5 n=7, P+8 n=7) were DNase treated to eliminate extravesical DNA contamination. MVs-derived DNA was amplified using the Sureplex DNA amplification system (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This amplification step increases the DNA yield obtained per sample to ensure a sufficient amount for qPCR analysis without altering the proportion of the different sequences. Samples were purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), and the DNA was quantified using D1000 ScreenTape in a TapeStation 4200 instrument (Agilent). Only DNA samples containing >0.1 ng/µL were used for the qPCR analysis. The mitochondrial ATP8 gene was amplified in a qPCR machine using the following primers: Forward 5'-CTAAAAATATTAAACACAAACTACCACCTACCTC-3' and Reverse 5'-GTTCATTTTGGTTCTCAGGGTTTGTTATAA-3'. Standard curves were created by qPCR amplifying serial dilutions of the ATP8 amplicon and used to calculate the copy number of mtDNA in 250 pg of DNA per reaction. Half of the MVs samples were used to calculate the concentration of MVs by NTA analysis, and the mtDNA copy number was normalized with the number of MVs (mtDNA copy number/MV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Embryo Biopsy and Genetic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryo biopsy was performed as previously described in Polim et al's17 (link) study. Briefly, a trophectoderm biopsy was performed on day 5 or 6, depending on the embryologist's assessment regarding the blastocyst quality. Of note, 3 to 5 cells of Trophectoderm (TE) were biopsied and transferred into a sterile microcentrifuge tube containing phosphate-buffered saline solution (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA), which was supplemented with 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone (Origio). The samples were stored at −20°C before further use of genetic analysis. Whole-genome amplification was performed using the SurePlex DNA Amplification System (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The Veriseq PGS-MiSeq kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was used for the Next-generation sequencing (NGS) procedure, and the MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was used for sequencing. Data interpretation used the BlueFuse Multi Software (version 4.5; Illumina, San Diego, CA; 32178). The threshold for calling mosaic was a 30% to 80% mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells (<30% was euploid, and >80% was aneuploid).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Blastocyst Embryo Culture and PGT-A

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were kept in culture in a time-lapse incubator, single-step culture media (LifeGlobal®, Paramus, NJ, USA), with 5% oxygen concentration, as described previously (17 (link)). Embryos were transferred at the stage of the blastocyst. When performed, the PGT-A procedure was carried out as previously described (23 (link)). Embryos were biopsied and vitrified on days 5 and 6 of development. Genetic testing on the embryo was performed by array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) using accessible kits and software (SurePlex® DNA Amplification System, 24Sure® Microarray Pack, BlueFuseMulti®, Illumina®) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Trophectoderm biopsy and genetic analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Zona of day-3 embryos was initially drilled by laser
beam. Primary criteria for the embryo selection was the
same as described for Cleavage-stage biopsy. The embryo
culture continued and those developing to the blastocyst
stage were biopsied using laser technology as previously
described (22 (link), 24 (link)). Only well-defined inner cell mass
blastocysts with hatching trophectoderm were biopsied.
Three to eight trophectoderm cells were biopsied.
After biopsy, the embryos were washed in 1X
phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Gibco, USA) and they
were transferred to digestion buffer with minimum PBS
for further genetic analysis. The lysis and Whole Genome
Amplification step was performed by SurePlex®DNA
Amplification System (Illumina, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole Genome Amplification and NGS Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample cell preparation, cell lysing procedures, DNA extraction, and whole genome amplification (WGA) were performed using the SurePlex DNA Amplification System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s recommended conditions. The DNA concentration of the product after amplification was measured using a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific) with the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay kit (ThermoFisher Scientific).
Following WGA, the samples were treated using a VeriSeq PGS Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. NGS was performed using a MiSeq testing device (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The obtained data were analyzed using Bluefuse Multi software to obtain the karyotype information of the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Chromosomal Screening in PGD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A proportion of stimulation cycles were also designed for chromosome screening, either PCR analysis of chromosome 21 content or CCS by CGH. Embryo screening for chromosome 21 content was performed simultaneously with thalassemia screening from 2011 onwards for a small number of cycles. At least three informative STR markers on chromosome 21 were examined to ensure the presence of enough markers to aid the identification of aneuploidy. This was performed as described above for thalassemia testing. In 2014, CCS by CGH was adopted for the majority of PGD patients screened for monogenic disorders regardless of whether HLA matching was required. CGH was performed prior to thalassemia screening, and only embryos with no detectable anomalies were subsequently tested for thalassemia mutations and, if required, HLA typing. CGH was performed on embryo biopsies using the SurePlex DNA Amplification System (whole genome amplification kit) and the BlueGnome 24sure BAC array (Illumina) as per the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!